Trial Outcomes & Findings for Text Message Intervention for Alcohol Use and Sexual Violence in College Students (NCT NCT05065918)
NCT ID: NCT05065918
Last Updated: 2024-10-17
Results Overview
as measured using a 30-day timeline follow-back (TLFB)
COMPLETED
NA
183 participants
3 month follow up
2024-10-17
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
Alcohol use reduction content
alcohol use reduction content: The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).
|
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
92
|
91
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
91
|
89
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Text Message Intervention for Alcohol Use and Sexual Violence in College Students
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
n=92 Participants
Alcohol use reduction content
alcohol use reduction content: The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).
|
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
n=91 Participants
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.
|
Total
n=183 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
92 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
183 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.07 • n=5 Participants
|
21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.47 • n=7 Participants
|
20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.30 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
142 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
87 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
146 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
92 participants
n=5 Participants
|
91 participants
n=7 Participants
|
183 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 month follow upas measured using a 30-day timeline follow-back (TLFB)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
n=92 Participants
Alcohol use reduction content
alcohol use reduction content: The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).
|
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
n=91 Participants
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Drinking Days Per Month
|
6.45 drinking days in the past 30 days
Standard Deviation 4.50
|
5.91 drinking days in the past 30 days
Standard Deviation 4.97
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 month follow upas measured using a 30-day timeline follow-back (TLFB)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
n=91 Participants
Alcohol use reduction content
alcohol use reduction content: The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).
|
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
n=89 Participants
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Drinking Days Per Month
|
5.98 drinking days in the past 30 days
Standard Deviation 3.84
|
6.00 drinking days in the past 30 days
Standard Deviation 3.85
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 month follow upas measured using a 30-day timeline follow-back (TLFB)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
n=92 Participants
Alcohol use reduction content
alcohol use reduction content: The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).
|
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
n=91 Participants
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Binge Drinking Days Per Month
|
6.45 binge drinking days in the past 30 days
Standard Deviation 4.50
|
5.91 binge drinking days in the past 30 days
Standard Deviation 4.97
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 month follow upas measured using a 30-day timeline follow-back (TLFB)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
n=91 Participants
Alcohol use reduction content
alcohol use reduction content: The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).
|
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
n=89 Participants
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Binge Drinking Days Per Month
|
2.03 binge drinking days in the past 30 days
Standard Deviation 2.55
|
1.71 binge drinking days in the past 30 days
Standard Deviation 2.51
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 month follow upUse of sexual violence harm reduction strategies assessed with an 11 item scale used by the American College Health Association's National College Health Survey of Protective Behavioral Strategies. Participants report on how often when drinking/socializing in the past 3 months they used each of the specific behaviors on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from (1 = never, 5 = always; theoretical range 11-55) with higher scores indicating higher frequency use of harm reduction strategies.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
n=92 Participants
Alcohol use reduction content
alcohol use reduction content: The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).
|
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
n=91 Participants
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Use of Sexual Violence Harm Reduction Strategies
|
36.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.38
|
37.26 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.19
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 month follow upUse of sexual violence harm reduction strategies assessed with an 11 item scale used by the American College Health Association's National College Health Survey of Protective Behavioral Strategies. Participants report on how often when drinking/socializing in the past 3 months they used each of the specific behaviors on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from (1 = never, 5 = always; theoretical range 11-55) with higher scores indicating higher frequency use of harm reduction strategies.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
n=91 Participants
Alcohol use reduction content
alcohol use reduction content: The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).
|
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
n=89 Participants
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Use of Sexual Violence Harm Reduction Strategies
|
37.26 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.19
|
36.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.33
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 month follow upAlcohol and sexual consent scale. A series of questions were asked to measure recognition of what constitutes sexual violence and attitudes related to the role of alcohol in risk for sexual violence. 12 item scale, using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from ("strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"; theoretical range of 12-60), with a higher mean score indicating greater knowledge and recognition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
n=92 Participants
Alcohol use reduction content
alcohol use reduction content: The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).
|
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
n=91 Participants
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge of Sexual Violence and Alcohol Risk
|
37.35 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.95
|
36.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.72
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 month follow upAlcohol and sexual consent scale. A series of questions were asked to measure recognition of what constitutes sexual violence and attitudes related to the role of alcohol in risk for sexual violence. 12 item scale, using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from ("strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"; theoretical range of 12-60), with a higher mean score indicating greater knowledge and recognition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
n=91 Participants
Alcohol use reduction content
alcohol use reduction content: The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).
|
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
n=89 Participants
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge of Sexual Violence and Alcohol Risk
|
37.11 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.58
|
36.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.51
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 month follow upPerceived behavioral control subscale of the Sexual Consent Scale-Revised. Participants reported how efficacious they feel at obtaining consent for sexual activity of a 5-point Likert scale. 11 item scale ("strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"; theoretical range of 11-55). Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
n=92 Participants
Alcohol use reduction content
alcohol use reduction content: The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).
|
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
n=91 Participants
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Self-efficacy to Obtain Sexual Consent.
|
42.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.03
|
40.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.74
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 month follow upPerceived behavioral control subscale of the Sexual Consent Scale-Revised. Participants reported how efficacious they feel at obtaining consent for sexual activity of a 5-point Likert scale. 11 item scale ("strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"; theoretical range of 11-55). Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
n=91 Participants
Alcohol use reduction content
alcohol use reduction content: The control condition will be a previously tested TM-delivered alcohol use reduction intervention. Prior to typical drinking occasions, individuals planning a drinking event are prompted to consider committing to a drinking limit goal, i.e.: "Would you be willing to set a goal to drink less than X drinks when drinking?". Based on willingness to commit to the goal, a feedback message is provided. During typical drinking periods, individuals receive a goal reminder. Each week, the program provides goal success/failure feedback or drinking quantity feedback. For example, those occasions where an individual committed to a drinking limit goal triggers either messages to reinforce goal successes or reframe goal failures. When an individual did not commit to a drink limit goal, they are provided feedback based on alcohol quantity (e.g. high risk drinking feedback).
|
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
n=88 Participants
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction content
sexual violence and alcohol use harm reduction text message content: The multi-target sexual violence harm reduction and alcohol use intervention will use a similar model to the alcohol use reduction intervention previous developed and implemented. Students will be: 1) queried via TM prior to typical drinking days regarding both alcohol use and SV harm reduction goal setting; 2) provided with goal reminders during drinking period; and 3) assessed for goal attainment and given feedback following drinking episodes. As with the control condition, post-drinking assessment happens weekly on Sundays. Monday thru Saturday participants will randomly receive or not receive one appropriate message pathway from the message library using the pre-determined pathways for messages.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Self-efficacy to Obtain Sexual Consent.
|
42.42 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.29
|
40.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.42
|
Adverse Events
Control - Alcohol Use Reduction Content
Intervention - Sexual Violence and Alcohol Use Harm Reduction Content
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Jocelyn Anderson
The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place