Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Effectiveness of Poly-l-lactic Acid (PLLA) for the Improvement in Appearance of Cellulite (NCT NCT05064761)

NCT ID: NCT05064761

Last Updated: 2024-09-26

Results Overview

Aesthetic improvement was assessed by comparing a photograph taken before the first treatment at the baseline visit to current visit. On a 7-graded GAIS from "very much worse" to "very much improved" as follows; very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse and very much worse. Responder was defined as a participant with a rating of at least improved as assessed by the treating investigator (assessed as very much improved, much improved or improved) compared to pre-treatment. Number of aesthetic improved thighs of responders based on treating investigator assessment using GAIS at Month 9 were reported.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

29 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At Month 9

Results posted on

2024-09-26

Participant Flow

This study was conducted at Canada from 19 November 2021 to 27 February 2023.

A total of 29 participants were enrolled in the study. All enrolled participants were treated and completed the study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Treatment Group (Sculptra)
Participants with intent to undergo treatment to improve appearance of cellulite were enrolled and treated with Sculptra in three sessions spaced one month (+2 weeks) apart. Participants were treated at baseline, Month 1 and Month 2.
Overall Study
STARTED
29
Overall Study
COMPLETED
29
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Safety and Effectiveness of Poly-l-lactic Acid (PLLA) for the Improvement in Appearance of Cellulite

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Treatment Group (Sculptra)
n=29 Participants
Participants with intent to undergo treatment to improve appearance of cellulite were enrolled and treated with Sculptra in three sessions spaced one month (+2 weeks) apart. Participants were treated at baseline, Month 1 and Month 2.
Age, Continuous
41.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.01 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At Month 9

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) Included all participants who were injected in both thighs.

Aesthetic improvement was assessed by comparing a photograph taken before the first treatment at the baseline visit to current visit. On a 7-graded GAIS from "very much worse" to "very much improved" as follows; very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse and very much worse. Responder was defined as a participant with a rating of at least improved as assessed by the treating investigator (assessed as very much improved, much improved or improved) compared to pre-treatment. Number of aesthetic improved thighs of responders based on treating investigator assessment using GAIS at Month 9 were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Treatment Group (Sculptra)
n=58 Thighs
Participants with intent to undergo treatment to improve appearance of cellulite were enrolled and treated with Sculptra in three sessions spaced one month (+2 weeks) apart. Participants were treated at baseline, Month 1 and Month 2.
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 9
Right thigh · No change
1 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 9
Left thigh · Very much improved
23 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 9
Left thigh · Much improved
4 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 9
Left thigh · Improved
1 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 9
Left thigh · No change
1 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 9
Right thigh · Very much improved
24 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 9
Right thigh · Much improved
3 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 9
Right thigh · Improved
1 Thighs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At month 1, 2, 6 and 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) Included all participants who were injected in both thighs.

Aesthetic improvement was assessed by comparing a photograph taken before the first treatment at the baseline visit to a photograph from the current visit. on a 7-graded GAIS from "very much worse" to "very much improved" as follows; very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse and very much worse. Responder was defined as a participant with a rating of at least improved as assessed by the treating investigator (assessed as very much improved, much improved or improved) compared to pre-treatment. Number of aesthetic improved thighs of responders based on treating investigator assessment using GAIS at Month 1,2,6 and 12 were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Treatment Group (Sculptra)
n=58 Thighs
Participants with intent to undergo treatment to improve appearance of cellulite were enrolled and treated with Sculptra in three sessions spaced one month (+2 weeks) apart. Participants were treated at baseline, Month 1 and Month 2.
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 1, Left thigh · Much improved
8 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 12, Left thigh · Improved
1 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 12, Left thigh · No change
0 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 12, Right thigh · Very much improved
19 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 12, Right thigh · Much improved
8 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 12, Right thigh · Improved
2 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 12, Right thigh · No change
0 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 1, Left thigh · Very much improved
0 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 1, Left thigh · Improved
16 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 1, Left thigh · No change
5 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 1, Right thigh · Very much improved
1 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 1, Right thigh · Much improved
6 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 1, Right thigh · Improved
17 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 1, Right thigh · No change
5 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 2, Left thigh · Very much improved
2 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 2, Left thigh · Much improved
8 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 2, Left thigh · Improved
19 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 2, Left thigh · No change
0 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 2, Right thigh · Very much improved
2 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 2, Right thigh · Much improved
8 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 2, Right thigh · Improved
19 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 2, Right thigh · No change
0 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 6, Left thigh · Very much improved
16 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 6, Left thigh · Much improved
7 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 6, Left thigh · Improved
6 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 6, Left thigh · No change
0 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 6, Right thigh · Very much improved
16 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 6, Right thigh · Much improved
6 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 6, Right thigh · Improved
7 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 6, Right thigh · No change
0 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 12, Left thigh · Very much improved
18 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed Live by Treating Investigator at Month 1, 2, 6 and 12
Month 12, Left thigh · Much improved
10 Thighs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At Months 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) Included all participants who were injected in both thighs. Here, "Number analyzed" signifies those units (thighs) which were evaluable at the specified timeframe.

Aesthetic improvement was assessed by comparing a photograph taken before the first treatment at the baseline visit to a photograph from the current visit. on a 7-graded GAIS from "very much worse" to "very much improved" as follows; very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse, much worse and very much worse. Responder was defined as a participant with a rating of at least improved as assessed by themselves (assessed as very much improved, much improved or improved) compared to pre-treatment. Number of aesthetic improved thighs of responders based on participant photography assessment using GAIS at Month 1,2,6 and 12 were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Treatment Group (Sculptra)
n=58 Thighs
Participants with intent to undergo treatment to improve appearance of cellulite were enrolled and treated with Sculptra in three sessions spaced one month (+2 weeks) apart. Participants were treated at baseline, Month 1 and Month 2.
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 1, Left thigh · Very much improved
2 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 1, Left thigh · Much improved
3 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 1, Left thigh · Improved
19 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 1, Left thigh · No change
5 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 1, Right thigh · Very much improved
2 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 1, Right thigh · Much improved
2 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 1, Right thigh · Improved
20 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 1, Right thigh · No change
5 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 2, Left thigh · Very much improved
5 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 2, Left thigh · Much improved
8 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 2, Left thigh · Improved
14 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 2, Left thigh · No change
2 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 2, Right thigh · Very much improved
4 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 2, Right thigh · Much improved
9 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 2, Right thigh · Improved
14 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 2, Right thigh · No change
2 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 6, Left thigh · Very much improved
6 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 6, Left thigh · Much improved
9 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 6, Left thigh · Improved
11 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 6, Left thigh · No change
2 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 6, Right thigh · Very much improved
6 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 6, Right thigh · Much improved
8 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 6, Right thigh · Improved
13 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 6, Right thigh · No change
1 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 9, Left thigh · Very much improved
11 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 9, Left thigh · Much improved
5 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 9, Left thigh · Improved
11 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 9, Left thigh · No change
2 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 9, Right thigh · Very much improved
11 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 9, Right thigh · Much improved
5 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 9, Right thigh · Improved
12 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 9, Right thigh · No change
1 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 12, Left thigh · Very much improved
12 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 12, Left thigh · Much improved
5 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 12, Left thigh · Improved
10 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 12, Left thigh · No change
2 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 12, Right thigh · Very much improved
11 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 12, Right thigh · Much improved
6 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 12, Right thigh · No change
2 Thighs
Number of Aesthetic Improved Thighs of Responders According to Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) as Assessed by Participant Photography at Month 1, 2, 6, 9 and 12
Month 12, Right thigh · Improved
10 Thighs

Adverse Events

Treatment Group (Sculptra)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 10 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Treatment Group (Sculptra)
n=29 participants at risk
Participants with intent to undergo treatment to improve appearance of cellulite were enrolled and treated with Sculptra in three sessions spaced one month (+2 weeks) apart. Participants were treated at baseline, Month 1 and Month 2.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 12 months
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
6.9%
2/29 • Up to 12 months
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
10.3%
3/29 • Up to 12 months
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 12 months
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 12 months
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 12 months
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral prolapse
3.4%
1/29 • Up to 12 months

Additional Information

Clinical Project Manager

Galderma Research and Development, LLC (GLLC)

Phone: +1 817-961-5000

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place