Intracranial Stenting in Non-acute Symptomatic Ischemic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT05063630

Last Updated: 2021-10-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-01

Study Completion Date

2022-05-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In non-acute symptomatic ischemic stroke, the decision-making of medical treatment plus intracranial stenting has been more and more popular, especially in patients with intracranial large severe stenosis or occlusive artery. Nonetheless, there is no evidence from randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of this treatment after the Wingspan Stent System Post Market Surveillance (WEAVE) and Wingspan One Year Vascular Imaging Events and Neurologic Outcomes (WOVEN) trial compared with medical treatment alone. This trial was to investigate whether medical treatment plus intracranial stenting would prevent the recurrent ischemic stroke in the territory of the symptomatic intracranial artery during 1-year follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In symptomatic ischemic stroke due to intracranial large severe stenosis or occlusive artery, the choice for treatment has remained controversial after results of the Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial because it demonstrated that the efficacy of medical treatment was superior to intracranial stenting in the low risk of periprocedural stroke or death. However, this conclusion has influenced the role of intracranial stenting in the ischemic stroke treatment and recovery time for a long time because of the unproper patient selection of this trial such as no evidence of medical failure, intracranial stenting earlier than 7 days after the stroke and intracranial stenting in patients with transient ischemic attacks only. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandated study about intracranial stenting, WEAVE trial, reported not only 97.4% patients with no complication at 72 hours, but also a relatively low 8.5% recurrent stroke and death rate during 1 year in the WOVEN study. In case of the symptomatic stenosis greater than 70%, the probability of recurrent stroke and transient ischemic attack in the territory of the symptomatic stenotic artery in 1 year was 23% and 14%, respectively, despite treatment with antithrombotic therapy and standard management of vascular risk. Given a lot of patients with symptomatic ischemic stroke who have some adjustable indications for intracranial stenting deployment in the world and a paucity of evidence from randomized trials, the purpose of this trial was to compare this treatment versus medical one in the intracranial large severe stenosis or occlusive artery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intracranial Arteriosclerosis Ischemic Stroke Intracranial Arterial Diseases Arterial Occlusive Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Medical treatment plus intracranial stenting (MT plus IS)

This group will be both given medical treatment (aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg per day for 90 consecutive days and clopidogrel 75 mg per day thereafter) and performed with intracranial stenting.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Medical treatment plus intracranial stenting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This group will be both given medical treatment (aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg per day for 90 consecutive days and clopidogrel 75 mg per day thereafter) and performed with intracranial stenting.

Medical treatment alone (MT)

This group will be given medical treatment including aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg per day for 90 consecutive days and clopidogrel 75 mg per day thereafter.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Medical treatment alone

Intervention Type DRUG

This group will be given medical treatment including aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg per day for 90 consecutive days and clopidogrel 75 mg per day thereafter.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medical treatment plus intracranial stenting

This group will be both given medical treatment (aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg per day for 90 consecutive days and clopidogrel 75 mg per day thereafter) and performed with intracranial stenting.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Medical treatment alone

This group will be given medical treatment including aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg per day for 90 consecutive days and clopidogrel 75 mg per day thereafter.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MT plus IS MT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Evidence of intracranial large severe stenosis or occlusive artery in angiography.
* Absence of intracranial hemorrhage.
* Premorbid mRS score is ≤ 3.
* Recurrent stroke in the target territory during the medical treatment for ischemic stroke prevention.

Exclusion Criteria

* Tandem lesion.
* Loss to follow-up after discharge.
* A severe or fatal combined illness before acute ischemic stroke.
* Progressive neurologic deficit within 7 days after acute ischemic stroke.
* Large middle cerebral artery infarct within 30 days after acute ischemic stroke.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Can Tho Stroke International Services Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Cuong Tran Chi

Director - Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cuong Tran Chi, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Can Tho SIS Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Can Tho SIS Hospital

Can Tho, , Vietnam

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Vietnam

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Cuong Tran Chi, Doctor

Role: CONTACT

+84886559911

Can Tho SIS Hospital

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Cuong Tran Chi, Doctor

Role: primary

+84886559911

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, Turan TN, Fiorella D, Lane BF, Janis LS, Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Waters MF, Hoh BL, Hourihane JM, Levy EI, Alexandrov AV, Harrigan MR, Chiu D, Klucznik RP, Clark JM, McDougall CG, Johnson MD, Pride GL Jr, Torbey MT, Zaidat OO, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):993-1003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335. Epub 2011 Sep 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21899409 (View on PubMed)

Alexander MJ, Zauner A, Chaloupka JC, Baxter B, Callison RC, Gupta R, Song SS, Yu W; WEAVE Trial Sites and Interventionalists. WEAVE Trial: Final Results in 152 On-Label Patients. Stroke. 2019 Apr;50(4):889-894. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023996.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31125298 (View on PubMed)

Alexander MJ, Zauner A, Gupta R, Alshekhlee A, Fraser JF, Toth G, Given C, Mackenzie L, Kott B, Hassan AE, Shownkeen H, Baxter BW, Callison RC, Yu W. The WOVEN trial: Wingspan One-year Vascular Events and Neurologic Outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Apr;13(4):307-310. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016208. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32561658 (View on PubMed)

Zaidat OO, Fitzsimmons BF, Woodward BK, Wang Z, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Wakhloo A, Gupta R, Kirshner H, Megerian JT, Lesko J, Pitzer P, Ramos J, Castonguay AC, Barnwell S, Smith WS, Gress DR; VISSIT Trial Investigators. Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Mar 24-31;313(12):1240-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1693.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25803346 (View on PubMed)

Markus HS, Larsson SC, Dennis J, Kuker W, Schulz UG, Ford I, Clifton A, Rothwell PM. Vertebral artery stenting to prevent recurrent stroke in symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis: the VIST RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(41):1-30. doi: 10.3310/hta23410.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31422789 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CanTho S.I.S Hospital

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.