Trial Outcomes & Findings for The TRANQUILITY 2 Trial: A Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease (NCT NCT05062330)
NCT ID: NCT05062330
Last Updated: 2025-03-18
Results Overview
Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for Schirmer test (0 to 35 mm). Higher scores represent greater tear production. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from a mixed model repeated measures analysis of change from baseline, with baseline as a covariate, and time point and treatment group as factors.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
361 participants
The efficacy assessment period was before and after the final dose on Day 1 (Dose 4). Baseline was approximately two weeks before dosing at Screening.
2025-03-18
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Reproxalap
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution (0.25%) was administered 7 times over two consecutive days.
|
Vehicle
Vehicle ophthalmic solution was administered 7 times over two consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
181
|
180
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
168
|
168
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
The TRANQUILITY 2 Trial: A Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Reproxalap
n=181 Participants
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution (0.25%) was administered 7 times over two consecutive days.
|
Vehicle
n=180 Participants
Vehicle ophthalmic solution was administered 7 times over two consecutive days.
|
Total
n=361 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
181 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
180 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=5 Participants
|
61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=7 Participants
|
63.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
123 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
249 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
112 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
171 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
177 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
348 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
147 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
132 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
279 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: The efficacy assessment period was before and after the final dose on Day 1 (Dose 4). Baseline was approximately two weeks before dosing at Screening.Population: Intent-to-treat population with observed data only
Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for Schirmer test (0 to 35 mm). Higher scores represent greater tear production. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from a mixed model repeated measures analysis of change from baseline, with baseline as a covariate, and time point and treatment group as factors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=180 Participants
Vehicle ophthalmic solution was administered 7 times over two consecutive days.
|
Reproxalap
n=181 Participants
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution (0.25%) was administered 7 times over two consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Schirmer Test Mean Change From Baseline
|
-0.5 length in millimeters
Standard Error 0.4
|
1.8 length in millimeters
Standard Error 0.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: The efficacy assessment period was before and after the final dose on Day 1 (Dose 4). Baseline was approximately two weeks before dosing at Screening.Population: Intent-to-treat population with observed data only
Comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for number of subject eyes that are Schirmer test responders (10 millimeters or more increase from baseline). A generalized estimating equation analysis was performed with baseline as a covariate, and time point and treatment group as factors.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vehicle
n=180 Participants
Vehicle ophthalmic solution was administered 7 times over two consecutive days.
|
Reproxalap
n=181 Participants
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution (0.25%) was administered 7 times over two consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subject Eyes That Are Schirmer Test Responders
|
54 eyes
|
116 eyes
|
Adverse Events
Reproxalap
Vehicle
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Reproxalap
n=181 participants at risk
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution (0.25%) was administered 7 times over two consecutive days.
|
Vehicle
n=180 participants at risk
Vehicle ophthalmic solution was administered 7 times over two consecutive days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
General disorders and administration site conditions
|
80.1%
145/181 • Number of events 145 • The safety assessment period was two days.
|
3.3%
6/180 • Number of events 6 • The safety assessment period was two days.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place