Trial Outcomes & Findings for Developing Text-based Support for Parents of Adolescents After an Emergency Department Visit (NCT NCT05058664)

NCT ID: NCT05058664

Last Updated: 2024-05-16

Results Overview

Data represent participant dyads who were eligible and approached about study participation, and who agreed to take part in the study.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

240 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At the time of youth Emergency Department visit

Results posted on

2024-05-16

Participant Flow

Unless indicated otherwise, the data shown below represent youth participants, as they were the object of the study. Of 125 youth participants consented, 5 were removed due to administrative issues. 4 participants were not randomized due to a platform glitch, and 1 consented participant turned out to be ineligible. These 5 were not included in the analysis, so 120 dyads are included in the trial.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Control (Standard Care)
Standard Emergency Department services (usual care)
A-F Texting Component
The A-F texting component will include content consistent with best-practice recommendations for parents to buffer youth against suicide risk. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day.
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting Component
A-F texting plus P-F texting component arm includes the A-F component, as above, and P-F component. The P-F component includes an embedded micro-randomized trial (MRT) involving two daily randomizations to P-F message vs. no message conditions for the duration of the 6-week intervention. Participants who are randomized to this arm will be randomized twice each day (morning and evening) to either receive or not receive the P-F message at each randomization. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day. P-F texting component: Over the course of the 6 week intervention, parents will receive between 1-2 messages, depending on randomization (in addition to A-F component messages)
Overall Study
STARTED
37
42
41
Overall Study
COMPLETED
33
42
38
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
4
0
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Control (Standard Care)
Standard Emergency Department services (usual care)
A-F Texting Component
The A-F texting component will include content consistent with best-practice recommendations for parents to buffer youth against suicide risk. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day.
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting Component
A-F texting plus P-F texting component arm includes the A-F component, as above, and P-F component. The P-F component includes an embedded micro-randomized trial (MRT) involving two daily randomizations to P-F message vs. no message conditions for the duration of the 6-week intervention. Participants who are randomized to this arm will be randomized twice each day (morning and evening) to either receive or not receive the P-F message at each randomization. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day. P-F texting component: Over the course of the 6 week intervention, parents will receive between 1-2 messages, depending on randomization (in addition to A-F component messages)
Overall Study
No follow-up data provided
4
0
2
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
0
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Developing Text-based Support for Parents of Adolescents After an Emergency Department Visit

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Control (Standard Care)
n=37 Participants
Standard Emergency Department services (usual care)
A-F Texting Component
n=42 Participants
The A-F texting component will include content consistent with best-practice recommendations for parents to buffer youth against suicide risk. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day.
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting Component
n=41 Participants
A-F texting plus P-F texting component arm includes the A-F component, as above, and P-F component. The P-F component includes an embedded micro-randomized trial (MRT) involving two daily randomizations to P-F message vs. no message conditions for the duration of the 6-week intervention. Participants who are randomized to this arm will be randomized twice each day (morning and evening) to either receive or not receive the P-F message at each randomization. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day. P-F texting component: Over the course of the 6 week intervention, parents will receive between 1-2 messages, depending on randomization (in addition to A-F component messages)
Total
n=120 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
Age of adolescent members of dyads
15.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.42 • n=5 Participants
14.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.43 • n=7 Participants
14.98 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.19 • n=5 Participants
14.84 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.36 • n=4 Participants
Age, Continuous
Age of caregiver members of dyads
45.03 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.15 • n=5 Participants
43.74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.89 • n=7 Participants
45.20 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.15 • n=5 Participants
44.63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.69 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Sex of adolescent members of dyads · Female
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
79 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Sex of adolescent members of dyads · Male
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
41 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Sex of caregiver members of dyads · Female
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
38 Participants
n=7 Participants
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
106 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Sex of caregiver members of dyads · Male
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity of adolescent members of dyads · Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity of adolescent members of dyads · Not Hispanic or Latino
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
96 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity of adolescent members of dyads · Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity of caregiver members of dyads (not collected) · Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity of caregiver members of dyads (not collected) · Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity of caregiver members of dyads (not collected) · Unknown or Not Reported
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
42 Participants
n=7 Participants
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
120 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads · American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads · Asian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads · Black or African American
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads · White
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
90 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads · More than one race
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of adolescent members of dyads · Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads · American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads · Asian
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads · Black or African American
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads · White
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
38 Participants
n=7 Participants
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
107 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads · More than one race
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race of caregiver members of dyads · Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
37 dyads
n=5 Participants
42 dyads
n=7 Participants
41 dyads
n=5 Participants
120 dyads
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At the time of youth Emergency Department visit

Population: The data shown here represent potential youth participants who were eligible, as indicators of the dyad because they were the focus of the study.

Data represent participant dyads who were eligible and approached about study participation, and who agreed to take part in the study.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Participants Consented
n=207 Parent-youth dyads
Eligible individuals who were approached about study participation and who agreed to take part in the study
A-F Texting Component
The A-F texting component will include content consistent with best-practice recommendations for parents to buffer youth against suicide risk. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day.
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting Component
A-F texting plus P-F texting component arm includes the A-F component, as above, and P-F component. The P-F component includes an embedded micro-randomized trial (MRT) involving two daily randomizations to P-F message vs. no message conditions for the duration of the 6-week intervention. Participants who are randomized to this arm will be randomized twice each day (morning and evening) to either receive or not receive the P-F message at each randomization. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day. P-F texting component: Over the course of the 6 week intervention, parents will receive between 1-2 messages, depending on randomization (in addition to A-F component messages)
Percentage of Eligible Youth-Parent Dyads Who Agree to Participate in the Study,
125 Parent-youth dyads

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Data was used to determine retention rate among the participant dyads. We report on follow up completion for both adolescent and caregiver members of the dyad.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Participants Consented
n=37 Responses from dyad members
Eligible individuals who were approached about study participation and who agreed to take part in the study
A-F Texting Component
n=42 Responses from dyad members
The A-F texting component will include content consistent with best-practice recommendations for parents to buffer youth against suicide risk. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day.
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting Component
n=41 Responses from dyad members
A-F texting plus P-F texting component arm includes the A-F component, as above, and P-F component. The P-F component includes an embedded micro-randomized trial (MRT) involving two daily randomizations to P-F message vs. no message conditions for the duration of the 6-week intervention. Participants who are randomized to this arm will be randomized twice each day (morning and evening) to either receive or not receive the P-F message at each randomization. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day. P-F texting component: Over the course of the 6 week intervention, parents will receive between 1-2 messages, depending on randomization (in addition to A-F component messages)
Participant Dyads Who Completed Follow-up Assessments
Count of Parent responses
33 Responses from dyad members
42 Responses from dyad members
38 Responses from dyad members
Participant Dyads Who Completed Follow-up Assessments
Count of Adolescent Responses
29 Responses from dyad members
35 Responses from dyad members
27 Responses from dyad members

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

Results represent parent participants who did not request stopping the intervention (i.e., did not request to stop receiving messages).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Participants Consented
n=42 Participants
Eligible individuals who were approached about study participation and who agreed to take part in the study
A-F Texting Component
n=41 Participants
The A-F texting component will include content consistent with best-practice recommendations for parents to buffer youth against suicide risk. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day.
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting Component
A-F texting plus P-F texting component arm includes the A-F component, as above, and P-F component. The P-F component includes an embedded micro-randomized trial (MRT) involving two daily randomizations to P-F message vs. no message conditions for the duration of the 6-week intervention. Participants who are randomized to this arm will be randomized twice each day (morning and evening) to either receive or not receive the P-F message at each randomization. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day. P-F texting component: Over the course of the 6 week intervention, parents will receive between 1-2 messages, depending on randomization (in addition to A-F component messages)
Percentage of Participants Randomized to the Intervention Who Remained Active (Texting Arms Only)
42 Participants
39 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

Measured using the Modified Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), which was a 2-question survey. Each question had a range of 1-4. Adult participants were asked to rate both their overall satisfaction (1 meaning not satisfied to 4 meaning highly satisfied), and the likelihood that they would recommend their particular assigned intervention to a friend (1 meaning highly unlikely to 4 meaning highly likely).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Participants Consented
n=39 Participants
Eligible individuals who were approached about study participation and who agreed to take part in the study
A-F Texting Component
n=35 Participants
The A-F texting component will include content consistent with best-practice recommendations for parents to buffer youth against suicide risk. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day.
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting Component
A-F texting plus P-F texting component arm includes the A-F component, as above, and P-F component. The P-F component includes an embedded micro-randomized trial (MRT) involving two daily randomizations to P-F message vs. no message conditions for the duration of the 6-week intervention. Participants who are randomized to this arm will be randomized twice each day (morning and evening) to either receive or not receive the P-F message at each randomization. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day. P-F texting component: Over the course of the 6 week intervention, parents will receive between 1-2 messages, depending on randomization (in addition to A-F component messages)
Participating Parents' Satisfaction With the Intervention (Texting Arms Only)
Recommend to a friend
3.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
3.43 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
Participating Parents' Satisfaction With the Intervention (Texting Arms Only)
Overall satisfaction
3.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
3.37 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Parent participant request to withdraw from the study. Study intention was to collect the number of and reasons for withdrawals, but the sole withdrawal did not provide a reason.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Participants Consented
n=37 Participants
Eligible individuals who were approached about study participation and who agreed to take part in the study
A-F Texting Component
n=39 Participants
The A-F texting component will include content consistent with best-practice recommendations for parents to buffer youth against suicide risk. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day.
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting Component
n=35 Participants
A-F texting plus P-F texting component arm includes the A-F component, as above, and P-F component. The P-F component includes an embedded micro-randomized trial (MRT) involving two daily randomizations to P-F message vs. no message conditions for the duration of the 6-week intervention. Participants who are randomized to this arm will be randomized twice each day (morning and evening) to either receive or not receive the P-F message at each randomization. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day. P-F texting component: Over the course of the 6 week intervention, parents will receive between 1-2 messages, depending on randomization (in addition to A-F component messages)
Number of and Reasons for Active Withdrawals
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants

Adverse Events

Control

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

A-F Texting Component

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting Component

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Control
n=21 participants at risk
Standard care
A-F Texting Component
n=26 participants at risk
The A-F texting component will include content consistent with best-practice recommendations for parents to buffer youth against suicide risk. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day.
A-F Texting Plus P-F Texting Component
n=23 participants at risk
A-F texting plus P-F texting component arm includes the A-F component, as above, and P-F component. The P-F component includes an embedded micro-randomized trial (MRT) involving two daily randomizations to P-F message vs. no message conditions for the duration of the 6-week intervention. Participants who are randomized to this arm will be randomized twice each day (morning and evening) to either receive or not receive the P-F message at each randomization. A-F texting component: Over the course of the 6-week intervention parents in the A-F condition will receive 1 message each day. P-F texting component: Over the course of the 6 week intervention, parents will receive between 1-2 messages, depending on randomization (in addition to A-F component messages)
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
23.8%
5/21 • Up to 12 weeks
Since all youth participants were enrolled because of emergency dept. visit for suicide risk (ideation or attempts), those who were unreachable at follow-up were not included in denominators of suicide attempts, as they could not be presumed to have or not to have attempted suicide. Thus it is most accurate to report only known data that is based on collected AEs. Non-serious Adverse Events were not collected. Deaths and Adverse Events were not assessed/monitored in Parents.
7.7%
2/26 • Up to 12 weeks
Since all youth participants were enrolled because of emergency dept. visit for suicide risk (ideation or attempts), those who were unreachable at follow-up were not included in denominators of suicide attempts, as they could not be presumed to have or not to have attempted suicide. Thus it is most accurate to report only known data that is based on collected AEs. Non-serious Adverse Events were not collected. Deaths and Adverse Events were not assessed/monitored in Parents.
4.3%
1/23 • Up to 12 weeks
Since all youth participants were enrolled because of emergency dept. visit for suicide risk (ideation or attempts), those who were unreachable at follow-up were not included in denominators of suicide attempts, as they could not be presumed to have or not to have attempted suicide. Thus it is most accurate to report only known data that is based on collected AEs. Non-serious Adverse Events were not collected. Deaths and Adverse Events were not assessed/monitored in Parents.

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Ewa Czyz

University of Michigan

Phone: 734 764-9466

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place