Trial Outcomes & Findings for Robotic Cardiac Surgery Wet Lab Simulation Study (NCT NCT05043064)
NCT ID: NCT05043064
Last Updated: 2025-02-26
Results Overview
The time-based score (TBS) was calculated as follows: TBS = maximal total training time per task - actual completion time - errors. Units of measure - seconds. Minimum score 0, Maximum score 1222. TBS was calculated in seconds, where 0 was the lowest score and a higher number indicated a faster time to perform the task. The score range
COMPLETED
NA
19 participants
6 months
2025-02-26
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Experienced Robotic Cardiac Surgeons
Wet lab tasks: Robotic-assisted internal thoracic artery harvesting, mitral annulus sutures placement and atrial closure in porcine model
|
Cardiac Surgeons With Limited Robotic Experience
Wet lab tasks: Robotic-assisted internal thoracic artery harvesting, mitral annulus sutures placement and atrial closure in porcine model
|
Non-cardiac Surgeons With Limited Robotic Experience
Wet lab tasks: Robotic-assisted internal thoracic artery harvesting, mitral annulus sutures placement and atrial closure in porcine model
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
4
|
7
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
4
|
7
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Experienced Robotic Cardiac Surgeons
n=4 Participants
Wet lab tasks: Robotic-assisted internal thoracic artery harvesting, mitral annulus sutures placement and atrial closure in porcine model
|
Cardiac Surgeons With Limited Robotic Experience
n=7 Participants
Wet lab tasks: Robotic-assisted internal thoracic artery harvesting, mitral annulus sutures placement and atrial closure in porcine model
|
Non-cardiac Surgeons With Limited Robotic Experience
n=8 Participants
Wet lab tasks: Robotic-assisted internal thoracic artery harvesting, mitral annulus sutures placement and atrial closure in porcine model
|
Total
n=19 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44 years
n=4 Participants
|
55 years
n=7 Participants
|
42 years
n=8 Participants
|
45 years
n=19 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsThe time-based score (TBS) was calculated as follows: TBS = maximal total training time per task - actual completion time - errors. Units of measure - seconds. Minimum score 0, Maximum score 1222. TBS was calculated in seconds, where 0 was the lowest score and a higher number indicated a faster time to perform the task. The score range
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Experienced Robotic Cardiac Surgeons
n=4 Participants
Wet lab tasks: Robotic-assisted internal thoracic artery harvesting, mitral annulus sutures placement and atrial closure in porcine model
|
Cardiac Surgeons With Limited Robotic Experience
n=7 Participants
Wet lab tasks: Robotic-assisted internal thoracic artery harvesting, mitral annulus sutures placement and atrial closure in porcine model
|
Non-cardiac Surgeons With Limited Robotic Experience
n=8 Participants
Wet lab tasks: Robotic-assisted internal thoracic artery harvesting, mitral annulus sutures placement and atrial closure in porcine model
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time-based Score
|
553 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 47
|
127 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 171
|
143 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 181
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsIn modified Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (mGEARS) the tasks were not rated on autonomy domain as autonomy could not be evaluated from recordings. The mGEARS score was used to evaluate the overall robotic proficiency by 5 domains: depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, force sensitivity, and robotic control. The score ranged from 5 to 25, where 5 and 25 indicated the least and most proficient performance, respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Experienced Robotic Cardiac Surgeons
n=4 Participants
Wet lab tasks: Robotic-assisted internal thoracic artery harvesting, mitral annulus sutures placement and atrial closure in porcine model
|
Cardiac Surgeons With Limited Robotic Experience
n=7 Participants
Wet lab tasks: Robotic-assisted internal thoracic artery harvesting, mitral annulus sutures placement and atrial closure in porcine model
|
Non-cardiac Surgeons With Limited Robotic Experience
n=8 Participants
Wet lab tasks: Robotic-assisted internal thoracic artery harvesting, mitral annulus sutures placement and atrial closure in porcine model
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modified Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (mGEARS)
|
20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5
|
13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2
|
11 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3
|
Adverse Events
Experienced Robotic Cardiac Surgeons
Cardiac Surgeons With Limited Robotic Experience
Non-cardiac Surgeons With Limited Robotic Experience
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place