Recovery From 50 Eccentric Biceps Curls in Young, Untrained Men and Women
NCT ID: NCT05036239
Last Updated: 2023-11-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-03
2020-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
One interesting hypothesis regarding the molecular basis of decreased muscle strength as a result of EIMD, is related to the strain of this exercise mode causing "popped" sarcomeres. When sarcomeres are stretched beyond actin-myosin overlap, some sarcomeres may over-stretch. This results in overload of membranes, leading to opening of stretch-activated channels, and subsequently influx of Ca2+. High levels of cytoplasmic Ca2+ may cause degradation of contractile proteins or Excitation-Contraction coupling proteins mediated through increased calpain activity. However, a recent study by Cully and colleagues (2017) suggest a protective mechanism post heavy-load strength training related to Ca2+-handling. Cully et al. observed formation of vacuoles in longitudinally connecting tubules post exercise when exposing fibers to 1.3 μM \[Ca2+\] in the cytoplasma. These vacuoles provide an enclosed compartment where Ca2+ can be accumulated, preventing Ca2+ from initiating damage to the muscle. The role of Ca2+-regulation in recovery of muscle function warrants further investigation and clarification.
To the best of the investigators knowledge, the most valid method for estimating EIMD is by investigating myofibrillar disruption, and in some cases necrosis, in muscle biopsies. This requires many resources and is rather expensive. Currently, the best non-invasive marker of muscle damage is the force deficit observed at 48 hours post exercise. However, a measurement estimating muscle damage immediately post exercise is warranted because force deficit immediately post exercise will be confounded by muscle fatigue.
A novel study performed by Lacourpaille et al. (2017) showed a strong negative correlation (-0.80) between stiffness of the muscle tissue, shear modulus, measured 30 minutes post exercise and peak isometric force measured at 48 hours post exercise and therefore a strong relationship between the decline in force production capacity and increased stiffness post exercise, suggesting a possible method to predict EIMD immediately after exercise. However, direct evidence of this association is warranted, with measurements of shear modulus and EIMD biomarkers, such as the proportion of disrupted fibers and sarcoplasmic Ca2+ regulation.
The ability to predict EIMD after training is of great interest to athletes, but also patients suffering from e.g. muscular dystrophies. Being able to predict EIMD quickly and non-invasively after exercise will help employ optimal recovery.
The aim of this project is to investigate the link between exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) as changes in shear modulus by ultrasound shear wave elastography, and muscle damage as observed in the analysis of muscle biopsies. The hypothesis is that there is a strong relationship between muscle stiffness acute post exercise and degree of muscle damage observed in muscle biopsies. A secondary aim is to further the understanding of cellular mechanisms causing EIMD and the role of Ca2+ in the recovery of muscle function.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Exercised
One bout of 50 eccentric biceps curls
Eccentric biceps curls
10 x 5 repetitions of eccentric biceps curls, interspaced by 30 seconds of rest.
Control
No eccentric biceps curls
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Eccentric biceps curls
10 x 5 repetitions of eccentric biceps curls, interspaced by 30 seconds of rest.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Other conditions causing inability to perform heavy-load resistance exercise
* Having engaged in resistance exercise targeting the m. biceps brachii once a week or more over the past year
18 Years
35 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Université de Nantes
OTHER
Oslo University Hospital
OTHER
University of Oslo
OTHER
Syddansk Universitet, Denmark
UNKNOWN
University of Copenhagen
OTHER
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Truls Raastad
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Truls Raastad, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Oslo, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EIMD19
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id