Recovery From 50 Eccentric Biceps Curls in Young, Untrained Men and Women

NCT ID: NCT05036239

Last Updated: 2023-11-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-03

Study Completion Date

2020-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to investigate muscle stiffness in relation to muscle damaging work and to investigate how well the change in muscle stiffness correlates with the degree of muscle damage (myofibrillar disruption and necrosis). To date, the reduction in force-generating capacity is the best non-invasive marker of muscle damage. It is already established that muscle stiffness correlates well with the decline in force-generating capacity after damaging exercise. However, the correlation between degree of muscle damage and muscle stiffness has not yet been investigated. The main focus of the study is therefore to investigate the relationship between muscle stiffness and muscle damage. Further, the researchers aim to investigate how calcium cycling is affected by damaging work, and if impaired calcium cycling may partially explain the observed reduction in force-generating capacity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Regardless of whether an individual is in rehabilitation or exercise for general health or athletic performance, resistance exercise is an essential form of exercise when the goal is to increase muscle mass, strength and function. Although, resistance exercise primarily is associated with positive effects it may also result in muscle damage when the exercise is of high intensity and/or unaccustomed. This is known as exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) and is reflected by a substantial decrease in force-generating capacity and often accompanied by intracellular swelling and delayed onset muscle soreness. On a cellular level, EIMD include myofibrillar disruption, inflammatory response and in severe cases of EIMD; myofibre necrosis. While EIMD with its symptoms clearly is evident, its underlying mechanisms are still to be fully elaborated.

One interesting hypothesis regarding the molecular basis of decreased muscle strength as a result of EIMD, is related to the strain of this exercise mode causing "popped" sarcomeres. When sarcomeres are stretched beyond actin-myosin overlap, some sarcomeres may over-stretch. This results in overload of membranes, leading to opening of stretch-activated channels, and subsequently influx of Ca2+. High levels of cytoplasmic Ca2+ may cause degradation of contractile proteins or Excitation-Contraction coupling proteins mediated through increased calpain activity. However, a recent study by Cully and colleagues (2017) suggest a protective mechanism post heavy-load strength training related to Ca2+-handling. Cully et al. observed formation of vacuoles in longitudinally connecting tubules post exercise when exposing fibers to 1.3 μM \[Ca2+\] in the cytoplasma. These vacuoles provide an enclosed compartment where Ca2+ can be accumulated, preventing Ca2+ from initiating damage to the muscle. The role of Ca2+-regulation in recovery of muscle function warrants further investigation and clarification.

To the best of the investigators knowledge, the most valid method for estimating EIMD is by investigating myofibrillar disruption, and in some cases necrosis, in muscle biopsies. This requires many resources and is rather expensive. Currently, the best non-invasive marker of muscle damage is the force deficit observed at 48 hours post exercise. However, a measurement estimating muscle damage immediately post exercise is warranted because force deficit immediately post exercise will be confounded by muscle fatigue.

A novel study performed by Lacourpaille et al. (2017) showed a strong negative correlation (-0.80) between stiffness of the muscle tissue, shear modulus, measured 30 minutes post exercise and peak isometric force measured at 48 hours post exercise and therefore a strong relationship between the decline in force production capacity and increased stiffness post exercise, suggesting a possible method to predict EIMD immediately after exercise. However, direct evidence of this association is warranted, with measurements of shear modulus and EIMD biomarkers, such as the proportion of disrupted fibers and sarcoplasmic Ca2+ regulation.

The ability to predict EIMD after training is of great interest to athletes, but also patients suffering from e.g. muscular dystrophies. Being able to predict EIMD quickly and non-invasively after exercise will help employ optimal recovery.

The aim of this project is to investigate the link between exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) as changes in shear modulus by ultrasound shear wave elastography, and muscle damage as observed in the analysis of muscle biopsies. The hypothesis is that there is a strong relationship between muscle stiffness acute post exercise and degree of muscle damage observed in muscle biopsies. A secondary aim is to further the understanding of cellular mechanisms causing EIMD and the role of Ca2+ in the recovery of muscle function.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Recovery Muscle Damage Muscle Stiffness Cell Structure Alteration Calcium Cycling

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants perform one bout of eccentric exercise with one arm, while the contralateral arm serves as control. Which arm who receives eccentric exercise is randomized between dominant/non-dominant arm.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exercised

One bout of 50 eccentric biceps curls

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Eccentric biceps curls

Intervention Type OTHER

10 x 5 repetitions of eccentric biceps curls, interspaced by 30 seconds of rest.

Control

No eccentric biceps curls

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Eccentric biceps curls

10 x 5 repetitions of eccentric biceps curls, interspaced by 30 seconds of rest.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- 18 to 35 years of age

Exclusion Criteria

* Injury to the muscle-skeletal system
* Other conditions causing inability to perform heavy-load resistance exercise
* Having engaged in resistance exercise targeting the m. biceps brachii once a week or more over the past year
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Université de Nantes

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Oslo

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Syddansk Universitet, Denmark

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Copenhagen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Norwegian School of Sport Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Truls Raastad

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Truls Raastad, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Norwegian School of Sport Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Norwegian School of Sport Sciences

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EIMD19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id