Trial Outcomes & Findings for LYR-220 for Adult Subjects With Chronic Rhinosinusitis (BEACON Study) (NCT NCT05035654)
NCT ID: NCT05035654
Last Updated: 2024-12-17
Results Overview
Product-related unexpected serious adverse events
COMPLETED
PHASE2
48 participants
Through Week 28
2024-12-17
Participant Flow
2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product and are not included in the total count
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
LYR-220 Design 1: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
|
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
LYR-220 Design 2: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
|
Part 2:Bilateral Sham Procedure
Bilateral sham procedure control
Bilateral sham procedure control: Bilateral sham procedure control
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
3
|
24
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
2
|
22
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
LYR-220 Design 1: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
|
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
LYR-220 Design 2: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
|
Part 2:Bilateral Sham Procedure
Bilateral sham procedure control
Bilateral sham procedure control: Bilateral sham procedure control
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Bilateral Dislodgement
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
n=3 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1 LYR-220 Design 1: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
|
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
n=24 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2 LYR-220 Design 2: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
|
Part 2: Bilateral Sham Procedure
n=21 Participants
Bilateral sham procedure control Bilateral sham procedure control: Bilateral sham procedure control
|
Total
n=48 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
2 Participants
n=3 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
23 Participants
n=24 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
18 Participants
n=21 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
43 Participants
n=48 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
1 Participants
n=3 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
1 Participants
n=24 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
5 Participants
n=48 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.98 • n=3 Participants
|
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.91 • n=24 Participants
|
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29 • n=21 Participants
|
51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.49 • n=48 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=3 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
16 Participants
n=24 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
11 Participants
n=21 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
28 Participants
n=48 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=3 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
8 Participants
n=24 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
10 Participants
n=21 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
20 Participants
n=48 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
1 Participants
n=24 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
1 Participants
n=48 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
1 Participants
n=24 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
3 Participants
n=48 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
3 Participants
n=3 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
22 Participants
n=24 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
18 Participants
n=21 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
43 Participants
n=48 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
1 Participants
n=48 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants • 2 subjects were randomized but did not receive the investigational product
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
3 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=48 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=48 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
35.35 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.69 • n=2 Participants • Subjects with non-missing height and/or weight.
|
30.65 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.68 • n=21 Participants • Subjects with non-missing height and/or weight.
|
33.71 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.63 • n=19 Participants • Subjects with non-missing height and/or weight.
|
32.26 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.23 • n=42 Participants • Subjects with non-missing height and/or weight.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 28Population: Safety Analysis Set
Product-related unexpected serious adverse events
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
n=3 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1 LYR-220 Design 1: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
|
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
n=24 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2 LYR-220 Design 2: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
|
Part 2: Bilateral Sham Procedure
n=21 Participants
Bilateral sham procedure control Bilateral sham procedure control: Bilateral sham procedure control
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Product-related Unexpected Serious Adverse Events
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 25Population: PK Analysis Set Design 1- Part 1, PK Analysis Set Design 2 - Part 1; PK Analysis Set Design 2 - Part 2
Plasma MF concentrations at 1 hour post study treatment administration and at Days 2 or 3, days 5 or 8, and Weeks 4,12,16 or 20, 24 and 25. The PK analysis will be performed based on subjects with available plasma MF concentration data post Day 1 administration procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
n=3 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1 LYR-220 Design 1: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
|
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
n=3 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2 LYR-220 Design 2: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
|
Part 2: Bilateral Sham Procedure
n=21 Participants
Bilateral sham procedure control Bilateral sham procedure control: Bilateral sham procedure control
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasma MF Concentrations
1-Hour Post
|
11.04 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
—
|
18.11 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 13.09
|
|
Plasma MF Concentrations
Day 2
|
40.86 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.98
|
135.83 pg/mL
|
61.02 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 23.98
|
|
Plasma MF Concentrations
Day 3
|
97.77 pg/mL
|
55.86 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 28.70
|
46.00 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 26.05
|
|
Plasma MF Concentrations
Day 5
|
—
|
—
|
44.16 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 19.60
|
|
Plasma MF Concentrations
Day 8
|
68.34 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 38.67
|
72.31 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 19.15
|
58.87 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 21.36
|
|
Plasma MF Concentrations
Week 4
|
40.41 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 25.99
|
68.90 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.19
|
61.31 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 34.97
|
|
Plasma MF Concentrations
Week 12
|
15.14 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.26
|
68.00 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 20.96
|
50.17 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 17.79
|
|
Plasma MF Concentrations
Week 16
|
—
|
70.940 pg/mL
|
31.26 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 17.06
|
|
Plasma MF Concentrations
Week 20
|
7.58 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.31
|
22.6 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1
|
20.17 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 8.49
|
|
Plasma MF Concentrations
Week 24
|
2.08 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.14
|
11.52 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 8.77
|
11.18 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 12.96
|
|
Plasma MF Concentrations
Week 25
|
—
|
—
|
NA pg/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Statistics at any individual timepoint were calculated if at least half of the subjects have valid values (ie not missing, quantifialble and not outside collection window). Actual sampling times that were outside the sampling time windows were excluded from concentration summary.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 28Population: Safety Analysis Set
Percentage of subjects reporting treatment-emergent adverse events
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
n=3 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1 LYR-220 Design 1: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
|
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
n=24 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2 LYR-220 Design 2: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
|
Part 2: Bilateral Sham Procedure
n=21 Participants
Bilateral sham procedure control Bilateral sham procedure control: Bilateral sham procedure control
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Adverse Events
|
1 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 25Population: Safety Analysis Set
Percentage of subjects with newly identified or worsened endoscopic findings in the ethmoid cavity (mild, moderate, or severe)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
n=3 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1 LYR-220 Design 1: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
|
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
n=24 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2 LYR-220 Design 2: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
|
Part 2: Bilateral Sham Procedure
n=21 Participants
Bilateral sham procedure control Bilateral sham procedure control: Bilateral sham procedure control
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Endoscopic Findings
|
0 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 25Population: Safety Analysis Set
Percentage of subjects with clinically significant increase in IOP
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
n=3 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1 LYR-220 Design 1: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
|
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
n=24 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2 LYR-220 Design 2: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
|
Part 2: Bilateral Sham Procedure
n=21 Participants
Bilateral sham procedure control Bilateral sham procedure control: Bilateral sham procedure control
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ophthalmic Assessment: Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
IOP in 1 or both eyes >23 mm Hg at Post Baseline
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Ophthalmic Assessment: Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
An increase of IOP from Baseline in 1 or both eyes >=10 mm Hg
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 25Population: Safety Analysis Set
Percentage of subjects with newly identified or worsened cataract in one or both eyes
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
n=3 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1 LYR-220 Design 1: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
|
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
n=24 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2 LYR-220 Design 2: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
|
Part 2: Bilateral Sham Procedure
n=21 Participants
Bilateral sham procedure control Bilateral sham procedure control: Bilateral sham procedure control
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ophthalmic Assessment: Cataract
Newly Identified Cataract
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Ophthalmic Assessment: Cataract
Worsened Cataract
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 28Population: Efficacy Analysis Set - Part 2
The 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) questionnaire is a 22-item disease-specific quality of life instrument validated for use in CRS. Each symptom is scored as it has been over the past 2 weeks on a 6-point scale as follows: 0 = no problem, 1 = very mild problem, 2 = mild or slight problem, 3 = moderate problem, 4 = severe problem, 5 = problem as bad as it can be. The outcome measure is change from baseline in total patient-reported outcome score. The SNOT-22 total score is the sum of individual scores and ranges from 0 to 110. Higher scores indicate higher severity of symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
n=13 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1 LYR-220 Design 1: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
|
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
n=9 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2 LYR-220 Design 2: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
|
Part 2: Bilateral Sham Procedure
Bilateral sham procedure control Bilateral sham procedure control: Bilateral sham procedure control
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Improving Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Specific Quality of Life as Per the 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Questionnaire
|
-30.1 Change from Baseline in SNOT-22 score
Interval -74.0 to -2.0
|
-4.0 Change from Baseline in SNOT-22 score
Interval -34.0 to 32.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 28Population: Efficacy Analysis Set - Part 2
Change from baseline in the average composite score over the preceeding 7 days of the 3 Cardinal Symptoms (3CS).The 3CS include: nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion, facial pain/ pressure, and anterior/posterior nasal discharge. The diary is completed daily by study participants throughout the study. Each symptom/each question is scored daily on a 0-3 scale as follows: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The 3CS total score ranges from 0-9, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
n=21 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1 LYR-220 Design 1: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
|
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
n=21 Participants
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2 LYR-220 Design 2: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
|
Part 2: Bilateral Sham Procedure
Bilateral sham procedure control Bilateral sham procedure control: Bilateral sham procedure control
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Average Composite Score Over the Preceeding 7 Days of the 3 Cardinal Symptoms (3CS)
|
-1.68 Change from Baseline in 3CS Score
Standard Deviation 2.33
|
-0.48 Change from Baseline in 3CS Score
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
Part 2: Bilateral Sham Procedure
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Part 1: LYR-220 Design 1
n=3 participants at risk
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1 LYR-220 Design 1: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 1
|
Part 1 and Part 2: LYR-220 Design 2
n=24 participants at risk
Bilateral insertion of LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2 LYR-220 Design 2: LYR-220 drug matrix (mometasone furoate 7500 µg) Design 2
|
Part 2: Bilateral Sham Procedure
n=21 participants at risk
Bilateral sham procedure control Bilateral sham procedure control: Bilateral sham procedure control
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
33.3%
8/24 • Number of events 11 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
19.0%
4/21 • Number of events 4 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute Sinusitis
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
25.0%
6/24 • Number of events 9 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 4 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
16.7%
4/24 • Number of events 4 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
16.7%
4/24 • Number of events 4 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chronic Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
12.5%
3/24 • Number of events 3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal Odour
|
0.00%
0/3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported from Day 1 through Week 28 (~ 7 months).
Standard definition of adverse events and serious adverse events was used in the trial. All events were assesed for relationship to the study product and study procedure.
|
Additional Information
Senior Vice President, Clinical Affairs
Lyra Therapeutics
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Except as approved by Sponsor, single center data will not be published before multicenter data, unless \>1 year has elapsed since completion of the Study. PI may publish single center data provided that PI shall: i) provide a copy of the publication to Sponsor at least 60 days in advance of submission for publication; ii) delete Sponsor Confidential Information and make other reasonable changes; and iii) delay submission by up to 90 additional days to permit intellectual property filings.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER