Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Triptorelin 6-month Formulation in Paediatric Participants With Central Precocious Puberty. (NCT NCT05029622)
NCT ID: NCT05029622
Last Updated: 2025-02-19
Results Overview
LH response was defined as a peak LH \<=5 international units per liter (IU/L) after intravenous (IV) gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation. The GnRH stimulation test was performed by using an IV injection of gonadorelin (synthetic GnRH) to stimulate gonadotrophin release and blood samples were collected after the gonadorelin injection for central assessment of serum LH levels. Percentage of response was calculated by number of participants in the specified category divided by number of participants in the analysis population multiplied by 100.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
66 participants
At Month 6
2025-02-19
Participant Flow
This Phase 3, open-label, single arm, study was conducted in children with central precocious puberty (CPP) at 12 investigational sites in China from 25 August 2021 to 13 February 2023.
This study consisted of screening period (up to 28 days) and study duration of minimum 12 months and up to 13 months including screening period.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
All Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 milligrams (mg) intramuscular (IM) injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
66
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
65
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
All Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 milligrams (mg) intramuscular (IM) injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Triptorelin 6-month Formulation in Paediatric Participants With Central Precocious Puberty.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
7.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Chinese
|
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Month 6Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.
LH response was defined as a peak LH \<=5 international units per liter (IU/L) after intravenous (IV) gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation. The GnRH stimulation test was performed by using an IV injection of gonadorelin (synthetic GnRH) to stimulate gonadotrophin release and blood samples were collected after the gonadorelin injection for central assessment of serum LH levels. Percentage of response was calculated by number of participants in the specified category divided by number of participants in the analysis population multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Luteinising Hormone (LH) Suppression
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 94.6 to 100.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Months 3 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
LH response was defined as a peak LH \<=5 IU/L after IV GnRH stimulation. The GnRH stimulation test was performed by using an IV injection of gonadorelin (synthetic GnRH) to stimulate gonadotrophin release and blood samples were collected after the gonadorelin injection for central assessment of serum LH levels. Percentage of response was calculated by number of participants in the specified category divided by number of participants in the analysis population multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With LH Response to GnRH Test
Month 3
|
97.0 percentage of participants
Interval 89.5 to 99.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With LH Response to GnRH Test
Month 12
|
98.5 percentage of participants
Interval 91.8 to 100.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Months 3, 6, 9 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
Basal LH and FSH serum concentrations were analyzed centrally. Change from baseline was defined as the values for LH and FSH at indicated timepoints minus the value at baseline. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first study treatment administered.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Basal Serum LH and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
LH, Month 3
|
-1.6420 IU/L
Standard Deviation 2.4287
|
|
Change From Baseline in Basal Serum LH and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
LH, Month 6
|
-1.8015 IU/L
Standard Deviation 2.4109
|
|
Change From Baseline in Basal Serum LH and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
LH, Month 9
|
-1.6307 IU/L
Standard Deviation 2.3396
|
|
Change From Baseline in Basal Serum LH and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
LH, Month 12
|
-1.8504 IU/L
Standard Deviation 2.4524
|
|
Change From Baseline in Basal Serum LH and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
FSH, Month 3
|
-2.9938 IU/L
Standard Deviation 1.9450
|
|
Change From Baseline in Basal Serum LH and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
FSH, Month 6
|
-2.4871 IU/L
Standard Deviation 2.0414
|
|
Change From Baseline in Basal Serum LH and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
FSH, Month 9
|
-2.8586 IU/L
Standard Deviation 1.9310
|
|
Change From Baseline in Basal Serum LH and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Levels
FSH, Month 12
|
-2.5348 IU/L
Standard Deviation 1.9162
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Months 3, 6 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
Peak LH and FSH serum concentrations were analyzed centrally. Change from baseline was defined as the values for LH and FSH at indicated timepoints minus the value at baseline. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first study treatment administered. Blood samples were collected prior to gonadorelin injection (timepoint T0) and at 30 minutes (T30), 60 minutes (T60) and 90 minutes (T90) after a single IV injection of gonadorelin. A suppressed LH response to GnRH stimulation test was defined as peak serum LH \<=5 IU/L among the four timepoints (T0, T30, T60 and T90). The FSH response to GnRH stimulation was the peak serum FSH level among the four timepoints (T0, T30, T60 and T90).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Peak Serum LH and FSH Level After the GnRH Stimulation Test
LH, Month 3
|
-26.0075 IU/L
Standard Deviation 19.8863
|
|
Change From Baseline in Peak Serum LH and FSH Level After the GnRH Stimulation Test
LH, Month 6
|
-26.2867 IU/L
Standard Deviation 20.3004
|
|
Change From Baseline in Peak Serum LH and FSH Level After the GnRH Stimulation Test
LH, Month 12
|
-26.6065 IU/L
Standard Deviation 20.5680
|
|
Change From Baseline in Peak Serum LH and FSH Level After the GnRH Stimulation Test
FSH, Month 3
|
-11.7297 IU/L
Standard Deviation 5.1787
|
|
Change From Baseline in Peak Serum LH and FSH Level After the GnRH Stimulation Test
FSH, Month 6
|
-10.0656 IU/L
Standard Deviation 5.0160
|
|
Change From Baseline in Peak Serum LH and FSH Level After the GnRH Stimulation Test
FSH, Month 12
|
-10.1645 IU/L
Standard Deviation 5.2442
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6 to Month 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
Peak LH serum concentration was analyzed centrally. LH response was defined as a peak LH \<=5 IU/L after IV GnRH stimulation. The GnRH stimulation test was performed by using an IV injection of gonadorelin (synthetic GnRH) to stimulate gonadotrophin release and blood samples were collected after the gonadorelin injection for central assessment of peak LH levels. Percentage of response was calculated by number of participants in the specified category divided by number of participants in the analysis population multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=65 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With LH Response (Peak LH <=5 IU/L) From Month 6 to Month 12
|
98.5 percentage of participants
Interval 91.8 to 100.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Months 3, 6, 9 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
Prepubertal sex steroids assessment included estradiol in female participants and testosterone in male participants. Prepubertal sex steroids levels were defined as: estradiol \<=20 picogram (pg)/ milliliter (mL) in female participants and testosterone \<=30 nanogram (ng)/ deciliter (dL) in male participants. Percentage of response was calculated by number of participants in the specified category divided by number of participants in the analysis population multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Prepubertal Levels of Sex Steroids
Month 3
|
97.0 percentage of participants
Interval 89.5 to 99.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Prepubertal Levels of Sex Steroids
Month 6
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 94.6 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Prepubertal Levels of Sex Steroids
Month 9
|
86.4 percentage of participants
Interval 75.7 to 93.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Prepubertal Levels of Sex Steroids
Month 12
|
98.5 percentage of participants
Interval 91.8 to 100.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Months 6 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
Z-scores are calculated using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Growth Charts. Change from baseline was defined as the values for Z-score at indicated timepoints minus the value at baseline. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to study treatment administration. Negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Height for Age (Z-Score)
Month 6
|
0.0734 Z-score
Standard Deviation 0.1433
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mean Height for Age (Z-Score)
Month 12
|
0.0204 Z-score
Standard Deviation 0.1567
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Months 6 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
Z-scores were calculated using CDC growth charts, that contained Box-Cox transformation (L), the median (M) and the generalized coefficient of variation (S). Percentile was obtained using the following equation M (1 + LSZ) \*\* (1/L), where \*\* indicated an exponent, such that m (1+LSZ)\*\* (1/L) meant raising (1+LSZ) to the (1/L)th power and then multiplying the M. Z was the Z-score that corresponds to the percentile. Negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean. Change from baseline was defined as the values for percentile of Z-score at indicated timepoints minus the value at baseline. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first study treatment administered.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Percentile for Height for Age
Month 6
|
1.4675 percentiles of Z-score
Standard Deviation 2.8638
|
|
Change From Baseline in Percentile for Height for Age
Month 12
|
0.2810 percentiles of Z-score
Standard Deviation 3.2237
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Months 6 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
Growth velocity analysis was part of auxological parameter. Change from baseline was defined as the value for each auxological parameter at indicated timepoints minus the value at baseline. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first study treatment administered.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity
Month 6
|
-3.938 centimeter (cm)/year
Standard Deviation 6.075
|
|
Change From Baseline in Growth Velocity
Month 12
|
-4.798 centimeter (cm)/year
Standard Deviation 5.577
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Months 6 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
BA was determined using X-rays of the hand and wrist by Greulich and Pyle method. CA was calculated as (visit date -birth date + 1)/365.25. Percentage of response was calculated as n/N\*100, where n was number of participants in the specified category and N was number of participants in the analysis population.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Bone Age (BA)/Chronological Age (CA) Ratio Not Risen
Month 6
|
95.5 percentage of participants
Interval 87.3 to 99.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Bone Age (BA)/Chronological Age (CA) Ratio Not Risen
Month 12
|
92.4 percentage of participants
Interval 83.2 to 97.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
BA was determined using X-rays of the hand and wrist by Greulich and Pyle method. CA was calculated as (visit date -birth date + 1)/365.25. Change from baseline was defined as the values for BA:CA ratio at indicated timepoints minus the value at baseline. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first study treatment administered.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in BA:CA Ratio
Month 6
|
-0.04 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in BA:CA Ratio
Month 12
|
-0.06 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Months 6 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
Pubertal stage parameters were analyzed using Tanner method. Pubertal stage parameters included genital development stage (GDS) in male participants, breast development stage (BDS) in female participants and pubic hair development (PHD) stage in both sexes. Percentage of response was calculated by number of participants in the specified category divided by number of participants in the analysis population multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Stabilized Pubertal Stage
BDS for female participants, Month 6
|
98.4 percentage of participants
Interval 91.3 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Stabilized Pubertal Stage
GDS for male participants, Month 6
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 39.8 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Stabilized Pubertal Stage
PHD for female participants, Month 6
|
91.9 percentage of participants
Interval 82.2 to 97.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Stabilized Pubertal Stage
PHD for male participants, Month 6
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 39.8 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Stabilized Pubertal Stage
BDS for female participants, Month 12
|
93.5 percentage of participants
Interval 84.3 to 98.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Stabilized Pubertal Stage
GDS for male participants, Month 12
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 39.8 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Stabilized Pubertal Stage
PHD for female participants, Month 12
|
87.1 percentage of participants
Interval 76.1 to 94.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Stabilized Pubertal Stage
PHD for male participants, Month 12
|
75.0 percentage of participants
Interval 19.4 to 99.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Months 6 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the female participants analyzed were reported.
Uterine length was determined by transabdominal ultrasound. Percentage of response was calculated by number of participants in the specified category divided by number of participants in the analysis population multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=62 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Regression of Uterine Length
Month 6
|
64.5 percentage of participants
Interval 51.3 to 76.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Regression of Uterine Length
Month 12
|
64.5 percentage of participants
Interval 51.3 to 76.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Months 6 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the male participants analyzed were reported.
Testis volume was a clinical assessment with orchidometer. Percentage of response was calculated by number of participants in the specified category divided by number of participants in the analysis population multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=4 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Progression of Testis Volumes
Month 12
|
75.0 percentage of participants
Interval 19.4 to 99.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Progression of Testis Volumes
Month 6
|
75.0 percentage of participants
Interval 19.4 to 99.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Months 6 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
BMI analysis was part of auxological parameter assessment. Change from baseline was defined as the value for each auxological parameter at indicated timepoints minus the value at baseline. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first study treatment administered.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Month 6
|
0.282 kilogram (kg)/meter square
Standard Deviation 0.882
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Month 12
|
1.195 kilogram (kg)/meter square
Standard Deviation 1.196
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at Months 6 and 12Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
Weight analysis was part of auxological parameter assessment. Change from baseline was defined as the value for each auxological parameter at indicated timepoints minus the value at baseline. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first study treatment administered.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
Month 6
|
2.020 kg
Standard Deviation 1.927
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight
Month 12
|
5.146 kg
Standard Deviation 2.816
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1, 4 hours post-injection; Month 3; Month 6, predose; Month 6, 4 hours post-injection; and Month 12Population: The Pharmacokinetic (PK) set consisted of all participants who received at 1 dose of study treatment and had at least 1 valid triptorelin concentration. Only data from the participants analyzed were reported.
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 Participants
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
Plasma Concentrations of Triptorelin
Day 1, 4 hours post-injection
|
41.8 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 56.9
|
|
Plasma Concentrations of Triptorelin
Month 3
|
0.0434 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 76.8
|
|
Plasma Concentrations of Triptorelin
Month 6, predose
|
0.0251 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 648.7
|
|
Plasma Concentrations of Triptorelin
Month 6, 4 hours post-injection
|
24.7 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66.0
|
|
Plasma Concentrations of Triptorelin
Month 12
|
0.0223 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 110.3
|
Adverse Events
All Participants
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
All Participants
n=66 participants at risk
Participants received triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg IM injection on Day 1.
|
|---|---|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
13.6%
9/66 • Number of events 9 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
|
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Nocturnal emission
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
10.6%
7/66 • Number of events 7 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
4.5%
3/66 • Number of events 3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Allergic cough
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Listless
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
13.6%
9/66 • Number of events 9 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Urinary occult blood positive
|
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Eosinophil count increased
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test abnormal
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Investigations
Myoglobin blood increased
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Scratch
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Asthenopia
|
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Refraction disorder
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Xerophthalmia
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
4.5%
3/66 • Number of events 3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 6 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fissure
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic steatosis
|
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
47.0%
31/66 • Number of events 45 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
15.2%
10/66 • Number of events 10 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Suspected COVID-19
|
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 4 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 4 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
4.5%
3/66 • Number of events 3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
4.5%
3/66 • Number of events 3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 2 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acarodermatitis
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Helicobacter infection
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute sinusitis
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Overweight
|
10.6%
7/66 • Number of events 7 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Obesity
|
4.5%
3/66 • Number of events 3 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin D deficiency
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported from the first dose of study treatment (Day 1) up to a maximum of approximately 344 days.
The Safety population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and have at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER