Trial Outcomes & Findings for Engaging Suicidal Patients in Mental Health Treatment (NCT NCT05021224)
NCT ID: NCT05021224
Last Updated: 2025-06-08
Results Overview
A reliable and valid 4-item tool to assess perceptions of the acceptability of engagement strategies. Each item is rated using a 5-point ordinal response options, ranging from 1= "completely disagree" to 5="completely agree" and scores are averaged across the four items to yield a mean scale score. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Study phase
NA
Target enrollment
29 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
6 months
Results posted on
2025-06-08
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Caring Contacts
Non-demanding message sent from the care team
|
Reminders
Appointment reminders sent electronically
|
Informational Poster
An informational poster linking to an infographic
|
Motivational Interviewing
Motivational interviewing training for intake coordinators
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
14
|
5
|
2
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
4
|
2
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Caring Contacts
Non-demanding message sent from the care team
|
Reminders
Appointment reminders sent electronically
|
Informational Poster
An informational poster linking to an infographic
|
Motivational Interviewing
Motivational interviewing training for intake coordinators
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Did not complete all survey items
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Engaging Suicidal Patients in Mental Health Treatment
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Caring Contacts
n=14 Participants
Non-demanding message sent from the care team
|
Reminders
n=5 Participants
Appointment reminders sent electronically
|
Informational Poster
n=2 Participants
An informational poster linking to an infographic
|
Motivational Interviewing
n=8 Participants
Motivational interviewing training for intake coordinators
|
Total
n=29 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
40.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.34 • n=5 Participants
|
49.60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.53 • n=7 Participants
|
54.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.21 • n=5 Participants
|
41.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.80 • n=4 Participants
|
43.45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.49 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=4 Participants
|
29 participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsA reliable and valid 4-item tool to assess perceptions of the acceptability of engagement strategies. Each item is rated using a 5-point ordinal response options, ranging from 1= "completely disagree" to 5="completely agree" and scores are averaged across the four items to yield a mean scale score. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Caring Contacts
n=14 Participants
Non-demanding message sent from the care team
|
Reminders
n=5 Participants
Appointment reminders sent electronically
|
Informational Poster
n=2 Participants
An informational poster linking to an infographic
|
Motivational Interviewing
n=8 Participants
Motivational interviewing training for intake coordinators
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
|
3.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
4.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
3.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
3.34 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsA reliable and valid 4-item tool to assess perceptions of the appropriateness of engagement strategies to the context. Each item is rated using a 5-point ordinal response options, ranging from 1= "completely disagree" to 5="completely agree" and scores are averaged across the four items to yield a mean scale score. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Caring Contacts
n=14 Participants
Non-demanding message sent from the care team
|
Reminders
n=5 Participants
Appointment reminders sent electronically
|
Informational Poster
n=2 Participants
An informational poster linking to an infographic
|
Motivational Interviewing
n=8 Participants
Motivational interviewing training for intake coordinators
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
|
3.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
4.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
4.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
3.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsA reliable and valid 4-item tool to assess perceptions of the feasibility of engagement strategies. Each item is rated using a 5-point ordinal response options, ranging from 1= "completely disagree" to 5="completely agree" and scores are averaged across the four items to yield a mean scale score. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Caring Contacts
n=14 Participants
Non-demanding message sent from the care team
|
Reminders
n=5 Participants
Appointment reminders sent electronically
|
Informational Poster
n=2 Participants
An informational poster linking to an infographic
|
Motivational Interviewing
n=8 Participants
Motivational interviewing training for intake coordinators
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
|
3.77 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
4.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
4.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
3.16 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsDerived from the electronic health record, defined as patient did or did not attend first mental health visit following referral.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Caring Contacts
n=14 Participants
Non-demanding message sent from the care team
|
Reminders
n=5 Participants
Appointment reminders sent electronically
|
Informational Poster
n=2 Participants
An informational poster linking to an infographic
|
Motivational Interviewing
n=8 Participants
Motivational interviewing training for intake coordinators
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Attendance at First Mental Health Visit
Attended visit
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Attendance at First Mental Health Visit
Did not attend visit
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Attendance at First Mental Health Visit
Missing/could not be determined
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Caring Contacts
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Reminders
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Informational Poster
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Motivational Interviewing
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place