Trial Outcomes & Findings for Suicide Prevention Intervention for Vulnerable Emerging Adult Sexual Minorities (NCT NCT05018143)

NCT ID: NCT05018143

Last Updated: 2025-02-17

Results Overview

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale is an interview-rated measure that will be completed by a blind independent evaluator. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale includes a measure of suicidal ideation (range 0-5: higher scores indicate more severe ideation). The measure has strong psychometric properties, including inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. The suicidal behavior and the suicidal ideation subscales have been shown to predict future suicidal behavior.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

64 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Change from baseline to 6 months

Results posted on

2025-02-17

Participant Flow

Recruitment occurred through a targeted social media campaign.

Participants complete the safety planning intervention prior to randomization.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
STARS
The investigators will deliver an online intervention focused on safety planning (STARS). The intervention content includes life skills interactive modules across 14 domains, a goal tracker, referral to community resources, and scheduling of peer mentoring sessions. STARS: This intervention will use an online mobile application for teach life skills, coupled with peer mentoring to support the use of safety planning.
Control Condition
The investigators will deliver an in-person therapeutic session where participants can develop an individualized safety plan for use during a suicidal crisis, focusing on adaptive coping, addressing barriers or ambivalence, and strengthening their self-efficacy. Control condition: In this intervention, participants will receive the safety planning intervention.
Overall Study
STARTED
32
32
Overall Study
COMPLETED
27
27
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
5
5

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
STARS
The investigators will deliver an online intervention focused on safety planning (STARS). The intervention content includes life skills interactive modules across 14 domains, a goal tracker, referral to community resources, and scheduling of peer mentoring sessions. STARS: This intervention will use an online mobile application for teach life skills, coupled with peer mentoring to support the use of safety planning.
Control Condition
The investigators will deliver an in-person therapeutic session where participants can develop an individualized safety plan for use during a suicidal crisis, focusing on adaptive coping, addressing barriers or ambivalence, and strengthening their self-efficacy. Control condition: In this intervention, participants will receive the safety planning intervention.
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
5
4
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

One participant in the intervention arm identified as third-gender. Two participants did not report their sex assigned at birth.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
STARS
n=32 Participants
The investigators will deliver an online intervention focused on safety planning (STARS). The intervention content includes life skills interactive modules across 14 domains, a goal tracker, referral to community resources, and scheduling of peer mentoring sessions. STARS: This intervention will use an online mobile application for teach life skills, coupled with peer mentoring to support the use of safety planning.
Control Condition
n=32 Participants
The investigators will deliver an in-person therapeutic session where participants can develop an individualized safety plan for use during a suicidal crisis, focusing on adaptive coping, addressing barriers or ambivalence, and strengthening their self-efficacy. Control condition: In this intervention, participants will receive the safety planning intervention.
Total
n=64 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
32 Participants
n=32 Participants
32 Participants
n=32 Participants
64 Participants
n=64 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
Age, Continuous
21 Mean
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.983 • n=32 Participants
21.8125 Mean
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.595 • n=32 Participants
21.40 Mean
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.83 • n=64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants
n=29 Participants • One participant in the intervention arm identified as third-gender. Two participants did not report their sex assigned at birth.
27 Participants
n=32 Participants • One participant in the intervention arm identified as third-gender. Two participants did not report their sex assigned at birth.
48 Participants
n=61 Participants • One participant in the intervention arm identified as third-gender. Two participants did not report their sex assigned at birth.
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants
n=29 Participants • One participant in the intervention arm identified as third-gender. Two participants did not report their sex assigned at birth.
5 Participants
n=32 Participants • One participant in the intervention arm identified as third-gender. Two participants did not report their sex assigned at birth.
13 Participants
n=61 Participants • One participant in the intervention arm identified as third-gender. Two participants did not report their sex assigned at birth.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
n=32 Participants
5 Participants
n=32 Participants
7 Participants
n=64 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
29 Participants
n=32 Participants
26 Participants
n=32 Participants
55 Participants
n=64 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=32 Participants
1 Participants
n=32 Participants
2 Participants
n=64 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=32 Participants
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
1 Participants
n=64 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
9 Participants
n=32 Participants
11 Participants
n=32 Participants
20 Participants
n=64 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
n=32 Participants
4 Participants
n=32 Participants
7 Participants
n=64 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants
n=32 Participants
15 Participants
n=32 Participants
33 Participants
n=64 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=32 Participants
2 Participants
n=32 Participants
3 Participants
n=64 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
0 Participants
n=32 Participants
0 Participants
n=64 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
32 participants
n=32 Participants
32 participants
n=32 Participants
64 participants
n=64 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from baseline to 6 months

Population: Participants with past month suicidal ideation

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale is an interview-rated measure that will be completed by a blind independent evaluator. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale includes a measure of suicidal ideation (range 0-5: higher scores indicate more severe ideation). The measure has strong psychometric properties, including inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. The suicidal behavior and the suicidal ideation subscales have been shown to predict future suicidal behavior.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
STARS
n=32 Participants
The investigators will deliver an online intervention focused on safety planning (STARS). The intervention content includes life skills interactive modules across 14 domains, a goal tracker, referral to community resources, and scheduling of peer mentoring sessions. STARS: This intervention will use an online mobile application for teach life skills, coupled with peer mentoring to support the use of safety planning.
Control Condition
n=32 Participants
The investigators will deliver an in-person therapeutic session where participants can develop an individualized safety plan for use during a suicidal crisis, focusing on adaptive coping, addressing barriers or ambivalence, and strengthening their self-efficacy. Control condition: In this intervention, participants will receive the safety planning intervention.
Suicidal Ideation and Behavior
6 months
1.000 Mean Units on the CSSRS SI scale
Standard Deviation 1.101946
1.103448 Mean Units on the CSSRS SI scale
Standard Deviation 1.31868
Suicidal Ideation and Behavior
Baseline
2.625 Mean Units on the CSSRS SI scale
Standard Deviation .870669
2.34375 Mean Units on the CSSRS SI scale
Standard Deviation 1.180743
Suicidal Ideation and Behavior
2 months
1.37931 Mean Units on the CSSRS SI scale
Standard Deviation 1.115277
1.064516 Mean Units on the CSSRS SI scale
Standard Deviation .9286364
Suicidal Ideation and Behavior
4 months
1.37931 Mean Units on the CSSRS SI scale
Standard Deviation 1.2653
.8333333 Mean Units on the CSSRS SI scale
Standard Deviation 1.147211

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from baseline to 6 months

Population: Participants with past month suicidal ideation

Support from family respectively, will be measured through the Procidano and Heller Perceived Social Support from Family Scale. This five-item emotional support scale is rated on a 5-point scale (1=Not True; 5=Very True), where higher scores indicate greater social support. The measure has strong convergent and divergent validity, as well a strong test-retest reliability and internal consistency.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
STARS
n=32 Participants
The investigators will deliver an online intervention focused on safety planning (STARS). The intervention content includes life skills interactive modules across 14 domains, a goal tracker, referral to community resources, and scheduling of peer mentoring sessions. STARS: This intervention will use an online mobile application for teach life skills, coupled with peer mentoring to support the use of safety planning.
Control Condition
n=32 Participants
The investigators will deliver an in-person therapeutic session where participants can develop an individualized safety plan for use during a suicidal crisis, focusing on adaptive coping, addressing barriers or ambivalence, and strengthening their self-efficacy. Control condition: In this intervention, participants will receive the safety planning intervention.
Social Support
Baseline
3.42 Mean score on family support
Standard Deviation 1.14
3.36 Mean score on family support
Standard Deviation 1.27
Social Support
2 months
3.61 Mean score on family support
Standard Deviation 0.96
3.43 Mean score on family support
Standard Deviation 1.20
Social Support
4 months
3.34 Mean score on family support
Standard Deviation 0.86
3.2 Mean score on family support
Standard Deviation 0.92
Social Support
6 months
3.45 Mean score on family support
Standard Deviation 0.96
3.23 Mean score on family support
Standard Deviation 1.19

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every 2 months until 6 months

Population: Participants with past month suicidal ideation

Self-reported use of their safety plan

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
STARS
n=32 Participants
The investigators will deliver an online intervention focused on safety planning (STARS). The intervention content includes life skills interactive modules across 14 domains, a goal tracker, referral to community resources, and scheduling of peer mentoring sessions. STARS: This intervention will use an online mobile application for teach life skills, coupled with peer mentoring to support the use of safety planning.
Control Condition
n=32 Participants
The investigators will deliver an in-person therapeutic session where participants can develop an individualized safety plan for use during a suicidal crisis, focusing on adaptive coping, addressing barriers or ambivalence, and strengthening their self-efficacy. Control condition: In this intervention, participants will receive the safety planning intervention.
Number of Participants Who Used Their Safety Plant at Least 1 Time
2 months
22 Participants
18 Participants
Number of Participants Who Used Their Safety Plant at Least 1 Time
4 months
20 Participants
18 Participants
Number of Participants Who Used Their Safety Plant at Least 1 Time
6 months
14 Participants
11 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from baseline to 6 months

Population: Participants with past month suicidal ideation

Sum of self-reported suicide ideation, with a possible range from 0 - 38, with higher values reflecting greater severity of suicidal ideation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
STARS
n=32 Participants
The investigators will deliver an online intervention focused on safety planning (STARS). The intervention content includes life skills interactive modules across 14 domains, a goal tracker, referral to community resources, and scheduling of peer mentoring sessions. STARS: This intervention will use an online mobile application for teach life skills, coupled with peer mentoring to support the use of safety planning.
Control Condition
n=32 Participants
The investigators will deliver an in-person therapeutic session where participants can develop an individualized safety plan for use during a suicidal crisis, focusing on adaptive coping, addressing barriers or ambivalence, and strengthening their self-efficacy. Control condition: In this intervention, participants will receive the safety planning intervention.
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
4 months
5.48 Score on the scale
Standard Deviation 5.70
5.15 Score on the scale
Standard Deviation 5.68
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
6 months
4.15 Score on the scale
Standard Deviation 5.48
5.88 Score on the scale
Standard Deviation 7.20
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Baseline
7.41 Score on the scale
Standard Deviation 6.30
7.56 Score on the scale
Standard Deviation 7.41
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
2 months
5.79 Score on the scale
Standard Deviation 5.79
6.10 Score on the scale
Standard Deviation 6.96

Adverse Events

STARS

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control Condition

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. José A. Bauermeister

University of Pennsylvania

Phone: 215-898-3242

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place