Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
246 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-02
2025-10-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Treatment options for LS include topical steroids such as clobetasol, immunomodulators such as tacrolimus, and non-ablative laser treatment. Although both treatments are well documented and used in clinical practice, direct comparative studies of the efficacy of topical corticosteroids versus laser treatment in women with LS are rare. For example, a PubMed literature search (search date 2021-03-14; search terms: lichen sclerosus, laser, corticosteroids, steroids, clobetasol, randomized) identified only a single randomized trial with limited power.
Given the available evidence, further high-quality studies are needed to define the superiority/inferiority of the different available treatment options such as nonablative lasers and topical corticosteroids.
Therefore, in this prospective, randomized, open-label, comparative study, treatment success after 3 courses of non-ablative treatment with CO2 laser every 14 days will be compared with treatment success after topical application of clobetasol 0.05% over 3 months (daily in the first month, every other day in month 2, and 3 times/week during month 3) at the time point 3 months after treatment initiation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fractionated CO2 Laser With and Without Clobetasol for Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
NCT04951206
To Compare Inflammatory Biomarkers Before and After Treatment With Clobetasol or Fractional CO2 Laser, in Women With Histologically Confirmed Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus, Without Prior Corticosteroid Treatment.
NCT07240519
Clobetasol Propionate Versus Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser for the Treatment of Lichen Sclerosus
NCT02573883
Clinical Trial to Demonstrate That the Dual Laser Therapy is Effective for the Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
NCT03926299
Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Comparison Between Clobetasol Propionate, Photodynamic Therapy and Low-Intensity Laser
NCT02416531
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Treatment options of LS include topical steroids such as clobetasol, topical immunomodulators such as tacrolimus, and non-ablative laser treatment. In a systematic review of the literature with 7 studies and 249 participants, clobetasol achieved improvement rates and remission rates of 70% to 89% and 20% to 35%, respectively. In comparison, non-ablative laser treatment leads to significant improvements in vulvar itching, dryness, pain, and dyspareunia in 50% to 85% of women with remission rates of up to 80% after 14 years of follow-up. Although both treatments are well documented and used in clinical practice, direct comparative studies assessing the efficacy of topical corticosteroids versus laser treatment in women with LS are rare. For example, in a PubMed literature search (search date 2021-03-14; search terms: lichen sclerosus, laser, corticosteroids, steroids, clobetasol, randomized) only one randomized trial was identified. In this study, the authors included 40 women with LS and compared 3 applications of non-ablative laser 2 weeks apart with 4 weeks of twice daily (2 weeks), once daily (1 week), and every other day (1 week) of topical clobetasol 0.05% cream. After 3 months of treatment laser-treated women had a significantly higher sum score (including burning, itching, and pain) measured on an 11-step visual analogue scale (VAS). Both treatments demonstrated histological improvement with reductions of inflammatory hallmarks in skin biopsies.
Given this body of evidence, more high-quality studies are needed to define the superiority/inferiority of the different available treatment options such as non-ablative laser and topical corticosteroids. Therefore, a prospective, randomized trial comparing non-ablative CO2 laser treatment and topical clobetasol 0.05% will be conducted. The aim of this prospective, randomized, open-label, comparative trial is to establish or refute the superiority of 3 courses of non-ablative treatment by CO2 laser every 14 days compared to topical clobetasol 0.05% (daily in month 1, every other day in month 2, and 3 times/week in month 3) for 3 months. The primary endpoint of this study is a sum score including the pathognomonic symptoms of LS, namely vulvar burning, itching, and pain, each measured on an 11-step VAS. Secondary endpoints will include the physician-scored rate of visual improvement (measured on an 11-item VAS), side effects, and patient-reported outcomes such as subjective overall improvement, general satisfaction, and quality of life (measured by a validated questionnaire for vulval disorders; i.e. the VDQI (Vulval Disease Quality of Life Index).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Clobetasol Group
Treatment with clobetasol-0,05% over 3 months (month 1: daily, month 2: every other day, month 3: 3x per week)
Clobetasol 0.05% Emollient Top Cream
Topical corticosteroid treatment of affected vulvar skin areas.
Laser Group
3 applications every 14 days of a non-ablative CO2 laser treatment
Non-ablative CO2 Laser
Superficial non-ablative laser treatment of affected vulvar skin areas.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clobetasol 0.05% Emollient Top Cream
Topical corticosteroid treatment of affected vulvar skin areas.
Non-ablative CO2 Laser
Superficial non-ablative laser treatment of affected vulvar skin areas.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Established diagnosis of LS (vulva and/or perineum and/or perianal region)
* Willingness to comply with study requirements
* No significant language barrier
Exclusion Criteria
* A history of vulvar cancer and/or vulvar dysplasia
* A history of vulvar surgery
* A contraindication against clobetasol treatment
* A known sun light allergy
* A known skin condition interfering with local ablative treatment such as neurodermatitis or bullous pemphigoid
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ruhr University of Bochum
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Clemens Tempfer
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clemens B Tempfer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ruhr-Universität Bochum / Marien Hospital Herne
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Marien Hospital Herne
Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bizjak Ogrinc U, Sencar S, Luzar B, Lukanovic A. Efficacy of Non-ablative Laser Therapy for Lichen Sclerosus: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Dec;41(12):1717-1725. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.01.023. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
Felmingham C, Chan L, Doyle LW, Veysey E. The Vulval Disease Quality of Life Index in women with vulval lichen sclerosus correlates with clinician and symptom scores. Australas J Dermatol. 2020 May;61(2):110-118. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13197. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
Murphy R. Lichen sclerosus. Dermatol Clin. 2010 Oct;28(4):707-15. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2010.07.006.
Renaud-Vilmer C, Cavelier-Balloy B, Porcher R, Dubertret L. Vulvar lichen sclerosus: effect of long-term topical application of a potent steroid on the course of the disease. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Jun;140(6):709-12. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.6.709.
Chi CC, Kirtschig G, Baldo M, Lewis F, Wang SH, Wojnarowska F. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on topical interventions for genital lichen sclerosus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Aug;67(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.044. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
Pagano T, Conforti A, Buonfantino C, Schettini F, Vallone R, Gallo A, Avino L, Alviggi C, De Placido G, Sopracordevole F. Effect of rescue fractional microablative CO2 laser on symptoms and sexual dysfunction in women affected by vulvar lichen sclerosus resistant to long-term use of topic corticosteroid: a prospective longitudinal study. Menopause. 2020 Apr;27(4):418-422. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001482.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LASER-LICH1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.