Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Public Health Intervention Program to Improve the Initial Management of Soft Tissue Sarcomas. (NCT NCT05007639)
NCT ID: NCT05007639
Last Updated: 2022-01-11
Results Overview
Imaging criterion for patients with a deep tumor was considered "compliant" if patients received magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or scan of the tumor zone before surgery. Adherence rate was calculated as the number of patients with "compliant imaging criterion" among patients with a deep tumor.
COMPLETED
274 participants
Assessed at surgery
2022-01-11
Participant Flow
All adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed between 1 November 2006 and 31 December 2007 in the Aquitaine and Midi-Pyrénées administrative districts in South-West France (6 million inhabitants, 10% of the French population) with primary STS of any stage were included.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Patients Diagnosed BEFORE Implementation of the Public Health Intervention Program
All adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed between 1 November 2006 and 31 December 2007 in the Aquitaine and Midi-Pyrénées administrative districts in South-West France (6 million inhabitants, 10% of the French population) with primary STS of any stage were included. Patients with visceral, bone, uterus or Kaposi's sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, or mesotheliomas were not included. Patients being treated for recurrence, and patients diagnosed outside of the administrative districts were not eligible. STS diagnoses were made in public or private pathology laboratories. Data were collected from all relevant sources: pathology reports, medical records from private and public centers,
Public Health intervention programme: The public health intervention programme combined 3 actions : a simple dissemination of information via the regional Unions of private practice physicians and the local correspondents of the regional networks (action 1), an action in the form of oral communication during regional meetings of professionals (action 2) and an action focused on each surgeon for whom the pathologist has diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma (action 3).
No public Health intervention programme
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
274
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
274
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Public Health Intervention Program to Improve the Initial Management of Soft Tissue Sarcomas.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Patients Diagnosed BEFORE Implementation of the Public Health Intervention Program
n=274 Participants
All adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed between 1 November 2006 and 31 December 2007 in the Aquitaine and Midi-Pyrénées administrative districts in South-West France (6 million inhabitants, 10% of the French population) with primary STS of any stage were included. Patients with visceral, bone, uterus or Kaposi's sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, or mesotheliomas were not included. Patients being treated for recurrence, and patients diagnosed outside of the administrative districts were not eligible. STS diagnoses were made in public or private pathology laboratories. Data were collected from all relevant sources: pathology reports, medical records from private and public centers,
Public Health intervention programme: The public health intervention programme combined 3 actions : a simple dissemination of information via the regional Unions of private practice physicians and the local correspondents of the regional networks (action 1), an action in the form of oral communication during regional meetings of professionals (action 2) and an action focused on each surgeon for whom the pathologist has diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma (action 3).
No public Health intervention programme
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.8 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
116 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
158 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
274 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed at surgeryPopulation: Participants analyzed : patients with a deep tumor
Imaging criterion for patients with a deep tumor was considered "compliant" if patients received magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or scan of the tumor zone before surgery. Adherence rate was calculated as the number of patients with "compliant imaging criterion" among patients with a deep tumor.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Diagnosed BEFORE Implementation of the Public Health Intervention Program
n=178 Participants
All adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed between 1 November 2006 and 31 December 2007 in the Aquitaine and Midi-Pyrénées administrative districts in South-West France (6 million inhabitants, 10% of the French population) with primary STS of any stage were included. Patients with visceral, bone, uterus or Kaposi's sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, or mesotheliomas were not included. Patients being treated for recurrence, and patients diagnosed outside of the administrative districts were not eligible. STS diagnoses were made in public or private pathology laboratories. Data were collected from all relevant sources: pathology reports, medical records from private and public centers,
Public Health intervention programme: The public health intervention programme combined 3 actions : a simple dissemination of information via the regional Unions of private practice physicians and the local correspondents of the regional networks (action 1), an action in the form of oral communication during regional meetings of professionals (action 2) and an action focused on each surgeon for whom the pathologist has diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma (action 3).
No public Health intervention programme
|
|---|---|
|
Adherence Rate to Diagnosis Imaging Guidelines for Patients With a Deep Sarcoma Tumor (Before Implementation of the Public Health Intervention Programme.
|
145 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed at surgeryPopulation: Participants Analyzed: patients with a superficial tumor
Imaging criterion for patients with a superficial tumor was considered "compliant" if patients received an MRI, scan, or ultrasound before surgery. Adherence rate was calculated as the number of patients with "compliant imaging criterion" among patients with a superficial tumor.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Diagnosed BEFORE Implementation of the Public Health Intervention Program
n=89 Participants
All adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed between 1 November 2006 and 31 December 2007 in the Aquitaine and Midi-Pyrénées administrative districts in South-West France (6 million inhabitants, 10% of the French population) with primary STS of any stage were included. Patients with visceral, bone, uterus or Kaposi's sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, or mesotheliomas were not included. Patients being treated for recurrence, and patients diagnosed outside of the administrative districts were not eligible. STS diagnoses were made in public or private pathology laboratories. Data were collected from all relevant sources: pathology reports, medical records from private and public centers,
Public Health intervention programme: The public health intervention programme combined 3 actions : a simple dissemination of information via the regional Unions of private practice physicians and the local correspondents of the regional networks (action 1), an action in the form of oral communication during regional meetings of professionals (action 2) and an action focused on each surgeon for whom the pathologist has diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma (action 3).
No public Health intervention programme
|
|---|---|
|
Adherence Rate to Diagnosis Imaging Guidelines for Patients With a Superficial Sarcoma Tumor (Before Implementation of the Public Health Intervention Programme)
|
33 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed up to 2 months following diagnosisPopulation: Participants Analyzed: patients with a deep tumor over 5 cm in size or tumors \<5 cm increasing in size
Diagnosis technique (biopsy) was considered "compliant" for deep tumors over 5 cm in size or tumors \<5 cm increasing in size if the diagnosis was made from a percutaneous or surgical biopsy. Adherence rate was calculated as the number of patients with "compliant diagnosis technique" among patients with deep tumors over 5 cm in size or tumors \<5 cm increasing in size.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Diagnosed BEFORE Implementation of the Public Health Intervention Program
n=232 Participants
All adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed between 1 November 2006 and 31 December 2007 in the Aquitaine and Midi-Pyrénées administrative districts in South-West France (6 million inhabitants, 10% of the French population) with primary STS of any stage were included. Patients with visceral, bone, uterus or Kaposi's sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, or mesotheliomas were not included. Patients being treated for recurrence, and patients diagnosed outside of the administrative districts were not eligible. STS diagnoses were made in public or private pathology laboratories. Data were collected from all relevant sources: pathology reports, medical records from private and public centers,
Public Health intervention programme: The public health intervention programme combined 3 actions : a simple dissemination of information via the regional Unions of private practice physicians and the local correspondents of the regional networks (action 1), an action in the form of oral communication during regional meetings of professionals (action 2) and an action focused on each surgeon for whom the pathologist has diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma (action 3).
No public Health intervention programme
|
|---|---|
|
Adherence Rate to Diagnosis Technique (Biopsy) Guidelines for Patients With Deep Tumors Over 5 cm in Size or Tumors <5 cm Increasing in Size (Before Implementation of the Public Health Intervention Programme)
|
120 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed up to 2 months prior to biopsyPopulation: Participants Analyzed: patients with a biopsy
Discussion in multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting was considered "compliant" if the patient record was discussed in MTD meeting before biopsy. Adherence rate was calculated as the number of patients with "compliant MDT meeting" among sarcoma patients with a biopsy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients Diagnosed BEFORE Implementation of the Public Health Intervention Program
n=157 Participants
All adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed between 1 November 2006 and 31 December 2007 in the Aquitaine and Midi-Pyrénées administrative districts in South-West France (6 million inhabitants, 10% of the French population) with primary STS of any stage were included. Patients with visceral, bone, uterus or Kaposi's sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, or mesotheliomas were not included. Patients being treated for recurrence, and patients diagnosed outside of the administrative districts were not eligible. STS diagnoses were made in public or private pathology laboratories. Data were collected from all relevant sources: pathology reports, medical records from private and public centers,
Public Health intervention programme: The public health intervention programme combined 3 actions : a simple dissemination of information via the regional Unions of private practice physicians and the local correspondents of the regional networks (action 1), an action in the form of oral communication during regional meetings of professionals (action 2) and an action focused on each surgeon for whom the pathologist has diagnosed soft tissue sarcoma (action 3).
No public Health intervention programme
|
|---|---|
|
Adherence Rate to Discussion in Multidisciplinary Team Meeting (Before Implementation of the Public Health Intervention Programme)
|
10 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Patients Diagnosed BEFORE Implementation of the Public Health Intervention Program
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Pr Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier
Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bordeaux, FR
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place