Dutch National Randomized Study: PSMA-PET/CT As a Triage Tool for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostatectomy Patients
NCT ID: NCT05000827
Last Updated: 2025-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
706 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-28
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Accuracy of Lymph Node Imaging in Prostate Cancer: PSMA PET-CT and Nano-MRI
NCT03223064
MR-Lymphography and Lymph Node Staging in Prostate Cancer
NCT00185029
Combined PSMA PET/MRI for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT04790968
Early Prostate Cancer Recurrence With PSMA PET Positive Unilateral Pelvic Lesion(s)
NCT04271579
Diagnostic Performance of PSMA PET/CT for Pre-operative Lymph Node Assessment in Intermediate and High-risk Non-metastasic Prostate Cancer (PREOP-PSMA ).
NCT04745871
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: To assess whether PSMA PET/CT can be safely used as a triage test for selecting primary prostate cancer patients for ePLND. We will additionally assess cost-effectiveness of the PSMA PET/ CT triage strategy.
Design, setting and Participants: THE PSMA-SELECT trial includes patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer, without evidence of distant metastasis (M0) on PSMA PET/CT, opting for treatment with radical prostatectomy (RP), with a nomogram-calculated risk of LNI \>5%. Patients will be randomized 1:1. In the intervention arm patients will only undergo ePLND in addition to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in case of suspected LNI on PSMA PET/CT (miN1), whereas ePLND will be omitted in those without PSMA positive lymph nodes (miN0). In the control arm, all patients will undergo ePLND in addition to RARP.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint of this study is biochemical recurrence rate at two years post-surgery. Secondary outcome measures are number of ePLNDs indicated and performed, treatment-related adverse events, initiation of salvage treatment, metastasis-free survival, patient-reported outcome measures and individual and cumulative healthcare costs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PSMA PET/CT based indication for ePLND:
1. Node-negative PSMA PET/CT \[N0\] and M0: do not perform ePLND
2. Node-positive PSMA PET/CT \[N1\] and M0: perform ePLND
Comparator Nomogram-based indication for ePLND (conform current EAU guidelines)
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PSMA PET/CT based indication for ePLND:
1. Node-negative PSMA PET/CT \[N0\] and M0: do not perform ePLND
2. Node-positive PSMA PET/CT \[N1\] and M0: perform ePLND
PSMA-PET/CT
In the intervention arm patients will only undergo ePLND in addition to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in case of suspected LNI on PSMA PET/CT (miN1), whereas ePLND will be omitted in those without PSMA positive lymph nodes (miN0).
Nomogram-based indication for ePLND (standard of care)
Nomogram-based indication for ePLND (conform current EAU guidelines)
Nomogram
Current standard of care includes performing extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in all patients with primary prostate cancer and a nomogram-based risk of LNI \>5%
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PSMA-PET/CT
In the intervention arm patients will only undergo ePLND in addition to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in case of suspected LNI on PSMA PET/CT (miN1), whereas ePLND will be omitted in those without PSMA positive lymph nodes (miN0).
Nomogram
Current standard of care includes performing extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in all patients with primary prostate cancer and a nomogram-based risk of LNI \>5%
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Indication for ePLND combined with robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) (MSKCC nomogram \>5%, if not applicable when only MRI targeted biopsies are positive, the Briganti nomogram will be used)
* Suitable for robot-assisted ePLND and RARP
* Mentally competent and understanding of benefits and potential burden of the study
* Written informed consent
* No known allergies for PSMA tracer.
Exclusion Criteria
* Known concomitant malignancies (except Basal Cell Carcinoma of the skin)
* Unwillingness or inability to undergo PSMA PET/CT and/or ePLND and RARP
* PSMA non-avid PCa (local tumor activity)
* Presence of distant metastasis (M1)
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
OTHER
Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jean-Paul A. van Basten
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-8189
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NL76042.091.21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.