Comparison of Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Under Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Without ERAS and Open Colorectal Surgery
NCT ID: NCT04997174
Last Updated: 2021-10-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
162 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-10-31
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ERAS
Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery with ERAS
Celecoxib
Patients in ERAS group received celecoxib
Non ERAS
Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery without ERAS
No interventions assigned to this group
Open
Patients undergoing open colorectal surgery
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Celecoxib
Patients in ERAS group received celecoxib
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* 2\. Those with any major intraoperative or postoperative complications.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prince of Songkla University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sasikaan Nimmaanrat
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sasikaan Nimmaanrat
Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tan SJ, Zhou F, Yui WK, Chen QY, Lin ZL, Hu RY, Gao T, Li N. Fast track programmes vs. traditional care in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Jan-Feb;61(129):79-84.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC.64-290-8-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id