Real-world Data Analysis of REN Treatment in Migraine Patients
NCT ID: NCT04992897
Last Updated: 2024-11-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
12151 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-06-15
2021-08-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Real World Data Analysis: Impact of High-Frequency REN Treatments As Migraine Preventive Therapy in Adolescence
NCT05769322
Real-world Data Analysis of REN Treatment in Adolescence With Migraine
NCT05443659
Migraine With and Without Aura Characteristics and Response to Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) Treatment
NCT06023953
Real-World Evidence (RWE) Data Analysis of 1-year Consecutive Use of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN)
NCT05760638
Acute Treatment of Migraine in Pre-Adolescents: Real-World Analysis of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN)
NCT06138756
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Data collection As part of the sign-up process to the Nerivio app, all patients accept the terms of use which specify that providing personal information is done of their own free will, and that their de-identified data may be used for research purposes. Users were not obligated to provide personal information and could treat without providing any feedback. The app includes a secured, personal migraine diary, which enables patients to record and track their migraines and other headaches. At the beginning of each treatment, and again 2 hours after the start of treatment, patients are prompted to record their symptoms, including pain level (none, mild, moderate, severe), functional disability ('No limitation, 'Some limitation', 'Moderate limitation, 'Severe limitation), and indication of which medications, if any, were taken within that 2-hour time window.
Dataset Real-world data of REN treatments collected from patients across the United States who used the REN device.
'Treatment' defined as a REN treatment of at least 20 minutes (the nominal duration is 45 minutes).
'Evaluable treatment' defined as a treatment in which pain levels were reported at baseline and post 2 hours.
Inclusion criteria for each of the different metrics:
A. REN-medication combinations: all evaluable treatments. B. Consistent efficacy: all users that performed at least 2 evaluable treatments. In order to isolate the effect of REN treatments, this dataset considered only treatments where REN was used as a standalone treatment.
C. Intensity stability: all treatments. D. Safety: all reported adverse events (AEs) within the time period.
Outcome measures
Respectively, outcome measures:
A. REN-Medication combinations (prevalence \& efficacy):
Medication intake outcomes calculated based on the 2h post-treatment report and comprised of the percentage of treatments in which no rescue medications were used, treatments in which OTC medications were taken, treatments in which triptans were taken, treatments in which other prescription medications were taken, and treatments in which medication intake status was not reported. OTC included acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and combinations of the two, with or without caffeine.
Efficacy outcomes calculated based on the baseline and post-2h reports and comprised of:
(i) consistency of pain relief (decrease in headache from moderate or severe at baseline to mild or no pain); (ii) consistency of pain-freedom (decrease in headache from mild, moderate, or severe at baseline to no pain); (iii) Consistency of improvement in function (improvement in at least one grade between baseline and 2 hours); and (iv) consistency of return to normal function (no functional disability at 2 hours).
B. Consistent efficacy:
Consistency defined as a response of a patient to the treatment in at least 50% of their treated attacks, and calculated for the four efficacy outcomes: (i) consistency of pain relief (ii) consistency of pain-freedom (iii) consistency of improvement in function; and (iv) consistency of return to normal function.
C. Treatment intensity:
The mean intensity of the stimulation collected for all treatments that were 20 minutes or longer, which were performed within the study's time window.
D. Safety:
All adverse events that were reported within the study's period, the following information provided: number of device-related AEs, percentage of the device-related AEs that were mild, moderate, and severe, and percentage of AEs that were serious vs. not serious.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
REN-Medication combinations
all evaluable treatments.
'Treatment' defined as a REN treatment of at least 20 minutes (the nominal duration is 45 minutes).
'Evaluable treatment' defined as a treatment in which pain levels were reported at baseline and post 2 hours.
Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN)
Acute migraine treament
Consistent efficacy
all users that performed at least 2 evaluable treatments. In order to isolate the effect of REN treatments, this dataset considered only treatments where REN was used as a standalone treatment.
'Treatment' defined as a REN treatment of at least 20 minutes (the nominal duration is 45 minutes).
'Evaluable treatment' defined as a treatment in which pain levels were reported at baseline and post 2 hours.
Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN)
Acute migraine treament
Treatment intensity distribution
all treatments.
'Treatment' defined as a REN treatment of at least 20 minutes (the nominal duration is 45 minutes).
Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN)
Acute migraine treament
Safety
all reported treatment/device-related adverse events (AEs) within the time period.
Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN)
Acute migraine treament
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN)
Acute migraine treament
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Cohort 2 Treatments in which medications were taken within 2 hours from REN treatment. Users that had less than 2 REN treatments.
Cohort 3 REN treatments that were shorter than 20 minutes
Cohort 4 All REN sessions, regardless of duration or medication intake.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Georgetown University
OTHER
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Theranica
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Theranica USA Inc
Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States
Theranica Bio-Electronics
Netanya, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yarnitsky D, Dodick DW, Grosberg BM, Burstein R, Ironi A, Harris D, Lin T, Silberstein SD. Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) Relieves Acute Migraine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial. Headache. 2019 Sep;59(8):1240-1252. doi: 10.1111/head.13551. Epub 2019 May 9.
Tepper SJ, Lin T, Montal T, Ironi A, Dougherty C. Real-world Experience with Remote Electrical Neuromodulation in the Acute Treatment of Migraine. Pain Med. 2020 Dec 25;21(12):3522-3529. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa299.
Hershey AD, Lin T, Gruper Y, Harris D, Ironi A, Berk T, Szperka CL, Berenson F. Remote electrical neuromodulation for acute treatment of migraine in adolescents. Headache. 2021 Feb;61(2):310-317. doi: 10.1111/head.14042. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
Nierenburg H, Vieira JR, Lev N, Lin T, Harris D, Vizel M, Ironi A, Lewis B, Wright P. Remote Electrical Neuromodulation for the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Patients with Chronic Migraine: An Open-Label Pilot Study. Pain Ther. 2020 Dec;9(2):531-543. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00185-1. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
Rapoport AM, Lin T. Device profile of the Nerivio for acute migraine treatment: overview of its efficacy and safety. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 Dec;16(12):1017-1023. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1695599. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
Marmura MJ, Lin T, Harris D, Ironi A, Rosen NL. Incorporating Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) Into Usual Care Reduces Acute Migraine Medication Use: An Open-Label Extension Study. Front Neurol. 2020 Apr 7;11:226. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00226. eCollection 2020.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RW002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.