Euploid Rate of Blastocyst Derived From PPOS VS Antagonist Protocol

NCT ID: NCT04989348

Last Updated: 2024-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

240 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-04

Study Completion Date

2024-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In-vitro fertilization (IVF) involves multiple follicular development, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer after fertilization. Despite recent advances in ovarian stimulation, the method of assisted fertilization and improved culture conditions, the implantation potential of embryos remains around 30-35% for a long time.

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists have been used in IVF to prevent the LH surge and the premature ovulation and are given in the luteal phase of the preceding cycle or in the follicular phase of the treatment cycle i.e. the long GnRH agonist. GnRH antagonists are now commonly used during IVF. In addition to the advantage of its simplicity, the use of antagonist is associated with a substantial reduction in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome without reducing the chance of achieving live birth when compared with the long agonist protocols. \[1\]

Progestin can inhibit the pituitary LH surge during ovarian stimulation and various studies show progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is effective in blocking the LH surge in IVF \[2-5\]. More and more centers in China are using PPOS because this regimen appears simpler and cheaper. Because of its negative effect on the endometrium, fresh transfer of embryos is not possible and elective freezing of all embryos is required. PPOS protocol is indicated in women who freeze all embryos because of various reasons such as undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy or the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

One prospective non-randomized study comparing the PPOS vs short GnRH agonist protocol shows similar oocytes retrieved between the two protocols, and the incidence of premature LH surge, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rates shows no significant difference. \[2\] A recent randomized trial comparing medroxyprogesterone and GnRH antagonist in an oocyte donation program showed a similar number of mature oocytes but reported lower ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate of recipients of oocyte donors who had received medroxyprogesterone in IVF \[6\]. However, the oocyte recipients in that trial were not randomized. Therefore, it is not possible to conclude the effect of progestin used in IVF on the pregnancy outcomes. It is possible that the PPOS protocol may have an adverse effect on the euploid rate of embryos, leading to a lower live birth rate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The inability to assess embryo quality and select those with the highest potential for implantation on the basis of morphology has led to the concept of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). PGT-A involves biopsy of a few cells from an embryo and assessment of the chromosome copy numbers. While PGT-A cannot create a healthy embryo or improve the health of an embryo, it provides a method of selecting embryos with a normal number of chromosomes for transfer. This in turn has the potential to increase the chance of having a healthy live birth and reduce the risk of miscarriage or an abnormal fetus caused by an abnormal number of chromosomes. Aneuploidy screening of all chromosomes is necessary to determine whether an embryo is chromosomally normal.

As the turnaround time of PGT-A with next generation sequencing is about a week, it is not possible to transfer blastocyst in the stimulated cycle. All blastocysts will be frozen post biopsy and the blastocysts with normal genetic makeup will be thawed and replaced in a subsequent menstrual cycle. Cryopreservation of blastocysts and replacing the frozen blastocysts after thawing in subsequent cycles become a common practice with vitrification as the cryopreservation method. A systematic review (7) of the clinical utility of PGT-A with comprehensive chromosome screening found that three small randomised controlled trials demonstrated benefit in young and good prognosis patients in terms of clinical pregnancy rates and the use of single embryo transfer.

This randomized trial aims to compare the euploid rate of blastocysts between PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocols in patients undergoing PGT-A.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

IVF

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Antagonist group

Women will receive antagonist (Cetrorelix 0.25mg) once subcutaneously daily from day 6 of ovarian stimulation till the day of the ovulation trigger.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Women will receive antagonist (Cetrorelix 0.25mg) once subcutaneously daily from day 6 of ovarian stimulation till the day of the ovulation trigger or

PPOS group

Women will receive oral medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily or Duphaston 10mg bd from Day 3 till the day of ovulation trigger.

Gonadotrophin (human menopausal gonadotrophin or recombinant FSH) injections will be started. Ovarian response will be monitored by transvaginal scanning with or without serum hormonal level. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG 1,000 IU) and GnRH agonist (decepepty 0.2mg) will be given for triggering of final maturation when at least 3 follicles reach \>17mm in diameter. Blood will be checked for serum estradiol and progesterone levels. Transvaginal USS-guided oocyte retrieval will be performed 36 hours after the trigger.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Women will receive oral medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily or Duphaston 10mg bd from Day 3 till the day of ovulation trigger.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol

Women will receive antagonist (Cetrorelix 0.25mg) once subcutaneously daily from day 6 of ovarian stimulation till the day of the ovulation trigger or

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol

Women will receive oral medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily or Duphaston 10mg bd from Day 3 till the day of ovulation trigger.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age of women \<43 years at the time of ovarian stimulation for IVF
2. PGT-A indicated for advanced maternal age (\>40 years), recurrent miscarriage (\>=2 or 3 consecutive miscarriage and repeated implantation failure (\>=4 embryos replaced or \>=2 blastocysts replaced without success)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Presence of a functional ovarian cyst with E2\>100 pg/mL
2. use of donor eggs/sperm,
3. Presence of hydrosalpinx or endometrial polyp which is not surgically treated
4. moderate or severe endometriosis
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

43 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

chen zhi qin

clinical doctor in chief

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shanghai first Maternity and Infant health hospital, Tong Ji University

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Al-Inany HG, Youssef MA, Aboulghar M, Broekmans F, Sterrenburg M, Smit J, Abou-Setta AM. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11;(5):CD001750. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001750.pub3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21563131 (View on PubMed)

Kuang Y, Chen Q, Fu Y, Wang Y, Hong Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Shoham Z. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):62-70.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 May 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25956370 (View on PubMed)

Dong J, Wang Y, Chai WR, Hong QQ, Wang NL, Sun LH, Long H, Wang L, Tian H, Lyu QF, Lu XF, Chen QJ, Kuang YP. The pregnancy outcome of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation using 4 versus 10 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate per day in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2017 Jun;124(7):1048-1055. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14622.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28276192 (View on PubMed)

Massin N. New stimulation regimens: endogenous and exogenous progesterone use to block the LH surge during ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):211-220. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw047.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28062551 (View on PubMed)

Yu S, Long H, Chang HY, Liu Y, Gao H, Zhu J, Quan X, Lyu Q, Kuang Y, Ai A. New application of dydrogesterone as a part of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol for IVF: a randomized controlled trial including 516 first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):229-237. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex367.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29300975 (View on PubMed)

Begueria R, Garcia D, Vassena R, Rodriguez A. Medroxyprogesterone acetate versus ganirelix in oocyte donation: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):872-880. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez034.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30927417 (View on PubMed)

Lee E, Illingworth P, Wilton L, Chambers GM. The clinical effectiveness of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in all 24 chromosomes (PGD-A): systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):473-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu303. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25432917 (View on PubMed)

Wang L, Wang JY, Zhang Y, Qian C, Wang XH, Ng EHY, Ai A, Chen ZQ. Comparison of the euploidy rate in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles following progestin-primed versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a randomized controlled study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 May 13;23(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01404-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40361159 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

shanghaiFMIH-20210729

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.