A Proposal for a New Classification of Secondary Cleft Lip and Nose Deformities in Repaired Unilateral Cleft Lip

NCT ID: NCT04972370

Last Updated: 2021-07-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Congenital cleft lip with or without cleft palate is one of the most common congenital malformations with an estimated incidence of about 1 every 500 to 700 live births. Cleft lip and palate are caused by a complex combination of many environmental and genetic factors sharing into the etiology. Patients with cleft lip and palate undergo multiple surgeries to reconstruct the anatomy and function to achieve symmetric, aesthetic, and functional nasolabial region. The most important goals of correction of the cleft are to achieve an acceptable facial appearance and psychological and social well-being for the patient and his or her family. Therefore, assessment of nasolabial appearance following cleft surgery remains an important parameter for evaluating the outcome of the procedure. Unfortunately, some residual deformities in the nasolabial region such as the abnormal shape of the nose, scar of the upper lip, uneven white roll, notched or excess vermilion border will remain noticeable. So, the assessment of secondary cleft nasolabial deformities needs a reliable rating scale. Although many scoring systems have been described in the literature, there is no globally accepted reliable one. A frequently used scoring system is the one proposed by Asher-McDade that uses frontal and lateral view masked prints of the nasolabial area. The use of three-dimensional (3D) imaging seems to be the most reliable in assessing cleft-related facial deformities. However, scoring based on two-dimensional (2D) photographs is easier to perform and more applicable in daily practice because all cleft patients are photographed during their treatment journey at predetermined intervals. Assessment of secondary nasolabial deformities in cleft patients in large numbers of patients helps compare the aesthetic results of the different treatment protocols and techniques.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip With or Without Cleft Palate

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip with or without Cleft Palate

Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip with or without Cleft Palate

Intervention Type OTHER

2 dimensional Photographs of patients with unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip with or without Cleft Palate

2 dimensional Photographs of patients with unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with multiple cleft lip repair surgeries.
2. If the primary cleft lip surgery was performed after the first year of life.
3. Patients with no available photographs
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sohag University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Merna Labib Ebid-Allah

Plastic Surgery Resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG, Dixon MJ, Shaw WC. Cleft lip and palate. Lancet. 2009 Nov 21;374(9703):1773-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4. Epub 2009 Sep 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19747722 (View on PubMed)

Dixon MJ, Marazita ML, Beaty TH, Murray JC. Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Mar;12(3):167-78. doi: 10.1038/nrg2933.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21331089 (View on PubMed)

Russell KA, Orthod D, Tompson B, Orthod D, Paedo D. Correlation between facial morphology and esthetics in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 May;46(3):319-25. doi: 10.1597/07-143.1. Epub 2008 Sep 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19642746 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Soh-Med-21-07-08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Congenital Heart Defects
NCT06124443 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Outcome of Fetal Spina Bifida
NCT01100697 COMPLETED