Patient-centered Nutrition Care II: An E-health Supported Symptom Based Nutrition Intervention
NCT ID: NCT04971083
Last Updated: 2021-07-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
115 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effectiveness of Patient Navigation in Cancer Care
NCT03305965
Electronic Patient Reporting of Symptoms and Unmet Needs to Connect Patients With Advanced Cancer to Palliative Care Services
NCT07195513
Behavioral Activation-Led Activity Engagement for Cancer Empowerment
NCT06796608
Electronic Psycho-oncological Adaptive Screening Program
NCT04749056
Computerized Questionnaires in Assessing Symptoms, Pain, Depression, and Physical Function in Patients With Metastatic and/or Advanced Locoregional Cancer
NCT00972634
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Nutrition care, augmented with E-Health tools containing tailored behavioural tipps enable the maintenance of overall nutrition status 12 weeks from baseline as measured with the Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. .
Secondary Endpoints will include:
* difference in the two arms in % weight loss
* difference in the number and severity of further Patient Reported nutrition relation symptoms according to Patient Reported- Common Toxicity Criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE™) developed by the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences in the National Cancer Institute Version date: 2/25/2019
* change in Quality of Life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General questionnaire
* improvement of nutrition status
* change in the % of estimated energy intake achieved
* difference of the number of discontinuations or delay in therapy
* difference of Glasgow Prognostic Score (only when C-reactive protein und Albumin are available in the routine blood draw)
* change in Distress status
Study Design:
This mono-centric prospective randomized study is designed to test the hypothesis of a causal pathway between nutritional interventions containing tailored behavioural tipps augmented with E-health tools on predefined outcomes (nutrition status, weight loss, extent and severity of nutrition related symptom burden (NRSB), distress status QoL) The study will utilize E-Health tools to ensure regular and early identification of potential nutrition related symptoms on the part of both the patient and the clinician. Within this framework, the trial will include cancer patients with tumors in the GI tract undergoing chemo and/or immune therapy who will receive therapy for a minimum of six weeks after recruitment.
Study Methods:
Control (CG): receives Usual Care (Nutrition intervention according to house standards: Nutrition Risk Score ≥ 3, or patient, or clinician request). Additionally, patients will record their energy intake, weight, general state of being, symptoms, and distress status in the Electronic Health Platform (EHIP) and have to ability to print and share this documentation with their health care providers (HCP) at their own discretion.
Intervention Group (IG): analog to the control group, patients record their energy intake, weight, general state of being, symptoms, and distress status in the Electronic Health Platform (EHIP). A built-in automated analysis will provide patient-tailored nutrition recommendations. Dependent on the severity of the NRSB recorded, they are, for example, provided with detailed written nutrition information and cooking recipes aimed at and/or asked to discuss their symptoms with their dietitian, physician, or, if necessary, to seek immediate medical care. As in the control group, patients will also have the ability to print and share this documentation with their HCP at their own discretion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual Care
Control (CG): receives Usual Care. Observational data regarding energy and fluid intake, weight, quality of life, symptoms, and distress status will be recorded in the Electronic Health Platform. They will have to ability to print and share this documentation with their HCP at their own discretion.
Inflammation status will be recorded when data from routine blood draws is available
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention Group
Intervention Group (IG): The intervention consists of a built-in automated analysis that provide patient-tailored nutrition recommendations and behavioural tipps. Described in detail this means that dependent on the severity of the nutrition related symptom burden (NRSB) recorded, the patients in the intervention group only are, for example provided with detailed written nutrition information and cooking recipes and/or asked to discuss the symptoms with their health care provider, dietitian, and/or physician, or even asked to seek immediate medical care.
Analog to the control group, observational data regarding energy and fluid intake, weight, quality of life, symptoms, and distress status will be recorded in the Electronic Health Platform. They will have to ability to print and share this documentation with their HCP at their own discretion.
Inflammation status will be recorded when data from routine blood draws is available
Intervention Group
This study is designed to provide patients a tool with which they can record the nutrition related symptom burden (NRSB) they are experiencing in real time. A pre-defined algorithm then provides them with tailored nutrition information and behavioural tipps based on the severity grade of the symptom recorded. The aim is to increase the chances that such symptoms, when clinically relevant, are addressed in a timely matter and thus the nutrition status is stabilized.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intervention Group
This study is designed to provide patients a tool with which they can record the nutrition related symptom burden (NRSB) they are experiencing in real time. A pre-defined algorithm then provides them with tailored nutrition information and behavioural tipps based on the severity grade of the symptom recorded. The aim is to increase the chances that such symptoms, when clinically relevant, are addressed in a timely matter and thus the nutrition status is stabilized.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ≥ 18 years
* Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≤ 2
* Open for, and ability to use, of E-Health platforms (own and uses one or more electronic devices with access to internet)
* Able to take 75% of foods orally
* Valid declaration of consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* ≤ 18 years
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≥3
* More than 75% of Energy intake is not taken oral but instead via enteral or parenteral route.
* Operation planned during the course of the Study (next 3 months)
* Patient who do provide not or withdraw their consent
* Not open or willing to use E-Health tools
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cankado GmbH
INDUSTRY
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
PD Dr. med. Volker Heinemann
Professor Doktor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicole Erickson, M.Sc.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CCC Ludwig Maximillian University Munich
Julian Holch, PD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CCC Ludwig Maximillian University Munich
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Comprehensive Cancer Center Ludwig Maximilian University Munich
Munich, Barvaria, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PaCC II
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.