Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Clinical Trial to Assess Subjects With Dry Eye Disease. (NCT NCT04971031)

NCT ID: NCT04971031

Last Updated: 2025-02-24

Results Overview

Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for conjunctival redness on a 0 to 4 scale ( 0 = normal, 4 = prominent), where a high score means a worse outcome. The intervention was administered bilaterally. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measure for change from baseline included baseline, treatment group, and nominal time point as fixed effects.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

158 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

The efficacy assessment period was assessed during the 90-minute dry eye chamber at Day 2; baseline was Pre-Dose #1 at Day 1.

Results posted on

2025-02-24

Participant Flow

One hundred fifty-eight subjects were randomized in the trial.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Reproxalap (0.25%)
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days
Vehicle
Vehicle ophthalmic solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days
Overall Study
STARTED
80
78
Overall Study
COMPLETED
79
75
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

A Clinical Trial to Assess Subjects With Dry Eye Disease.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Reproxalap (0.25%)
n=80 Participants
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days
Vehicle
n=78 Participants
Vehicle ophthalmic solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days
Total
n=158 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
48 Participants
n=7 Participants
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
55 Participants
n=7 Participants
114 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
67 Participants
n=7 Participants
142 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
68 Participants
n=7 Participants
135 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
80 participants
n=5 Participants
78 participants
n=7 Participants
158 participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Black
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Blue
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Brown
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Hazel
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Green
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Gray
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Right Eye)
Other
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Black
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Blue
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Brown
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Hazel
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Green
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Gray
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Iris Color (Left Eye)
Other
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: The efficacy assessment period was assessed during the 90-minute dry eye chamber at Day 2; baseline was Pre-Dose #1 at Day 1.

Population: Intent-to-Treat Population with observed data only

Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for conjunctival redness on a 0 to 4 scale ( 0 = normal, 4 = prominent), where a high score means a worse outcome. The intervention was administered bilaterally. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measure for change from baseline included baseline, treatment group, and nominal time point as fixed effects.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Reproxalap (0.25%)
n=80 Participants
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days
Vehicle
n=78 Participants
Vehicle ophthalmic solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days
Conjunctival Redness Assessed Via Digital Photography Over 90 Minutes in the Dry Eye Chamber
0.066 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0346
0.183 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0353

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: The efficacy assessment period was assessed during the 90-minute dry eye chamber at Day 2; baseline was Pre-Dose #1 at Day 1.

Population: Intent-to-Treat Population with observed data only

Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for subject-reported ocular dryness score VAS (0 = no discomfort, 100 = maximal discomfort), where a high score means a worse outcome. The intervention was administered bilaterally. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measure for change from baseline included baseline, treatment group, and nominal time point as fixed effects.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Reproxalap (0.25%)
n=80 Participants
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days
Vehicle
n=78 Participants
Vehicle ophthalmic solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days
Subject-reported Ocular Dryness Score (0 - 100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS))
-5.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.44
-3.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.51

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: The efficacy assessment period was before and after the final dose on Day 1; baseline was Pre-Dose #1 at Day 1.

Population: Intent-to-Treat Population with observed data only

Change from baseline comparison of reproxalap to vehicle for Schirmer test on a millimeter line (0 = none, 35 = maximum), where a shorter length indicates a worse outcome. The intervention was administered bilaterally. The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from mixed model repeated measure for change from baseline included baseline and treatment group as fixed effects.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Reproxalap (0.25%)
n=80 Participants
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days
Vehicle
n=78 Participants
Vehicle ophthalmic solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days
Schirmer Test Change From Baseline After the First Dose on Day 1
4.2 length in millimeters
Standard Error 0.83
2.1 length in millimeters
Standard Error 0.84

Adverse Events

Reproxalap (0.25%)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 52 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Vehicle

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Reproxalap (0.25%)
n=79 participants at risk
Reproxalap ophthalmic solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days
Vehicle
n=77 participants at risk
Vehicle ophthalmic solution administered 7 times over two consecutive days
General disorders
General disorders and administration site conditions
65.8%
52/79 • The period of time over which adverse events were collected for each subject in the clinical trial was approximately one week.
There were 158 subjects randomized in the trial (Intent-to-treat population). There were 156 subjects exposed to study drug (Safety population). Collection of adverse events is based on the Safety population.
3.9%
3/77 • The period of time over which adverse events were collected for each subject in the clinical trial was approximately one week.
There were 158 subjects randomized in the trial (Intent-to-treat population). There were 156 subjects exposed to study drug (Safety population). Collection of adverse events is based on the Safety population.

Additional Information

Sr. Director, Clinical Operations

Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.

Phone: 781-257-3063

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place