Percutaneous Peristyloid Glossopharyngeal Block After Tonsillectomy

NCT ID: NCT04970680

Last Updated: 2022-09-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-01

Study Completion Date

2022-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Adenotonsillectomy surgery in paediatrics is commonly managed as an ambulatory surgery. This may be attributed to the use of the electro-dissection surgical technique that decreases the incidence of immediate postoperative haemorrhage. However, the use of the electro-cautery technique increases postoperative inflammation.

This study aimed to compare the glossopharyngeal nerve block using the blind technique with the use of the ultrasound guidance Primary: FLACC score in the two groups 0,2,4,6 h after surgery at rest and with swallowing Secondary: need to analgesics, the difficulty of the technique, time consumption, recovery time, surgeon satisfaction, parents satisfaction, staff nurse satisfaction, anaesthetist self-confidence

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

INTRODUCTION Adenotonsillectomy surgery in paediatrics is commonly managed as an ambulatory surgery. This may be attributed to the use of the electro-dissection surgical technique that decreases the incidence of immediate postoperative haemorrhage. However, the use of the electro-cautery technique increases postoperative inflammation.

Sensory fibres of the glossopharyngeal nerve supply the tonsillar and peri-tonsillar areas. Thus, a bilateral glossopharyngeal nerve block may alleviate post-tonsillectomy pain and improve postoperative analgesia.

This is a Prospective randomized controlled clinical study, to compare two different technique used to block the glossopharyngeal nerve.

AIM OF WORK To improve post tonsillectomy pain control in children Anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia Paediatrics 3-7 years Tonsillectomy NOT adenotonsillectomy Postoperative control of pain OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare the glossopharyngeal nerve block using the blind technique with the use of the ultrasound guidance Primary: FLACC score in the two groups 0,2,4,6 h after surgery at rest and with swallowing Secondary: need to analgesics, the difficulty of the technique, time consumption, recovery time, surgeon satisfaction, parents satisfaction, staff nurse satisfaction, anaesthetist self-confidence METHODOLOGY 54 ASA I children allocated randomly into two groups: Group BL: Blind percutaneous peristyloid injection Group US: ultrasound-guided percutaneous peristyloid glossopharyngeal nerve block 54 children aged 3 to 7 years undergoing adenotonsillectomy without adenoidectomy were randomized to receive either local blind percutaneous peistyloid glossopharyngeal nerve block (n=27) or the use of ultrasound guidance for the same block (n=27). The pain was assessed by the FLACC scale or Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale, need for analgesics, and acceptance of diet during the postoperative period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

two groups, each will have peristyloid glossopharyngeal block, one with the help of ultrasound technology and the other blindly
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
the participant will have the block while anaesthetized, the care provider will do the block either blindly or using ultrasonic, the outcome assessor will not know which one have which technique

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

blind glossopharyngeal nerve block

patients will have the glossopharyngeal nerve block with the blind technique

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

glossopharyngeal nerve block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

glossopharyngeal nerve block either blindly or using the ultrasonic technique

ultrasonic glossopharyngeal nerve block

patients will have the glossopharyngeal nerve block using the ultrasonic technique

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

glossopharyngeal nerve block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

glossopharyngeal nerve block either blindly or using the ultrasonic technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

glossopharyngeal nerve block

glossopharyngeal nerve block either blindly or using the ultrasonic technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* children aged 3-7 years
* scheduled for tonsillectomy

Exclusion Criteria

* younger or elder children
* associated adenoidectomy
* history of allergy to local anaesthetics
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Suez Canal University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Abdelrhman Alshawadfy

Lecturer of anesthesia and intensive care

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Suez Canal University

Ismailia, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

glossopharyngeal nerve block

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.