Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effect of Clear Aligner Attachment Design on Extrusion of Maxillary Lateral Incisors (NCT NCT04968353)
NCT ID: NCT04968353
Last Updated: 2023-06-28
Results Overview
Percent achieved of the vertical (inciso-gingival) tooth movement will be assessed by comparing the initial ClinCheck software estimate tooth movement required to the amount of tooth movement observed
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
6 months
2023-06-28
Participant Flow
Recruitment began August, 2021 and final data collection was completed in June, 2022. Patients were recruited from 3 orthodontic practices. Units enrolled are counted as numbers of teeth. Potentially, 2 maxillary lateral incisors from each patient could have been enrolled.
Unit of analysis: Teeth
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Horizontal
Use of horizontal (unbeveled) attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Horizontal attachment: Horizontal attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Incisally-beveled
Use of incisally-beveled attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Incisally-beveled attachment: Incisally-beveled attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Gingivally-beveled
Use of gingivally-beveled attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Gingivally-beveled attachment: Gingivally-beveled attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Optimized
Use of optimized attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Optimized attachment: Optimized attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20 20
|
15 15
|
16 16
|
22 23
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
19 19
|
15 15
|
14 14
|
22 23
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1 1
|
0 0
|
2 2
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Horizontal
Use of horizontal (unbeveled) attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Horizontal attachment: Horizontal attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Incisally-beveled
Use of incisally-beveled attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Incisally-beveled attachment: Incisally-beveled attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Gingivally-beveled
Use of gingivally-beveled attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Gingivally-beveled attachment: Gingivally-beveled attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Optimized
Use of optimized attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Optimized attachment: Optimized attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Non-compliance
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Effect of Clear Aligner Attachment Design on Extrusion of Maxillary Lateral Incisors
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Incisally-beveled
n=15 Participants
Use of incisally-beveled attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Incisally-beveled attachment: Incisally-beveled attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Gingivally-beveled
n=14 Participants
Use of gingivally-beveled attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Gingivally-beveled attachment: Gingivally-beveled attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Optimized
n=22 Participants
Use of optimized attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Optimized attachment: Optimized attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Horizontal
n=19 Participants
Use of horizontal (unbeveled) attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Horizontal attachment: Horizontal attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Total
n=70 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
31.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3 • n=5 Participants
|
31.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 • n=7 Participants
|
32.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.26 • n=5 Participants
|
30.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.16 • n=4 Participants
|
31.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.01 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
15 participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=4 Participants
|
73 participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPercent achieved of the vertical (inciso-gingival) tooth movement will be assessed by comparing the initial ClinCheck software estimate tooth movement required to the amount of tooth movement observed
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Horizontal
n=19 Teeth
Use of horizontal (unbeveled) attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Horizontal attachment: Horizontal attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Incisally-beveled
n=15 Teeth
Use of incisally-beveled attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Incisally-beveled attachment: Incisally-beveled attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Gingivally-beveled
n=14 Teeth
Use of gingivally-beveled attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Gingivally-beveled attachment: Gingivally-beveled attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
Optimized
n=23 Teeth
Use of optimized attachment to extrude lateral incisor
Optimized attachment: Optimized attachments will be bonded to teeth before or during orthodontal treatment with clear aligners
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Vertical Tooth Movement
|
79 percentage of predicted
Interval 58.0 to 100.0
|
78 percentage of predicted
Interval 58.0 to 98.0
|
78 percentage of predicted
Interval 63.0 to 93.0
|
62 percentage of predicted
Interval 40.0 to 84.0
|
Adverse Events
Horizontal
Incisally-beveled
Gingivally-beveled
Optimized
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Steven J Lindauer
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry, Orthodontics
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place