Trial Outcomes & Findings for PREvention of Intrauterine Adhesion After Adhesiolysis With Novel Tri-block deGradable Polymer Film. (NCT NCT04963179)
NCT ID: NCT04963179
Last Updated: 2025-03-27
Results Overview
Change of AFS score between pre-adhesiolysis and second-look hysteroscopy (AFS) score The scale used to assess the severity of intrauterine adhesions is the American Fertility Society score. It is a 12 points composite score that adds-up 3 subcomponents: - Extend of adhesions (1 = less than 1/3 of the uterine cavity involved with adhesions to 4 = more than 2/3 of the uterine cavity involved with adhesions), * Type of adhesions (1 = Filmy adhesions to 4 = dense adhesions) * Menstrual pattern (0= normal to 4 = amenorrhea). The final score allows the following prognostic classification: 1-4 = mild disease, 5-8 = moderate disease 9-12 = severe disease
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
160 participants
At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeks
2025-03-27
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Womed Leaf
IUA prevention: The novel intrauterine barrier film (Womed Leaf) is inserted immediately after completion of the hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
Womed Leaf: Womed Leaf™ device is composed of a uterine anti-adhesion film pre-loaded inside a flexible inserter.
Womed Leaf™ is inserted in the uterine cavity by the gynecologist surgeon as a film folded into a 5 mm diameter flexible inserter. Once released, the film will unfold and swell into the uterine cavity to keep uterus walls separated during approximately 5 days. It is degraded and discharged naturally through the cervix and vagina in less than 30 days.
|
Control
No IUA prevention - no placebo after adhesiolysis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
75
|
85
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
71
|
82
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
PREvention of Intrauterine Adhesion After Adhesiolysis With Novel Tri-block deGradable Polymer Film.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Womed Leaf
n=75 Participants
IUA prevention: The novel intrauterine barrier film (Womed Leaf) is inserted immediately after completion of the hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
Womed Leaf: Womed Leaf™ device is composed of a uterine anti-adhesion film pre-loaded inside a flexible inserter.
Womed Leaf™ is inserted in the uterine cavity by the gynecologist surgeon as a film folded into a 5 mm diameter flexible inserter. Once released, the film will unfold and swell into the uterine cavity to keep uterus walls separated during approximately 5 days. It is degraded and discharged naturally through the cervix and vagina in less than 30 days.
|
Control
n=85 Participants
No IUA barrier - No placebo
|
Total
n=160 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
35.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=5 Participants
|
35.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 • n=7 Participants
|
35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
160 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
151 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
|
13 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
China
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
37 participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 participants
n=7 Participants
|
79 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksPopulation: The modified ITT (mITT) included all randomized patients, apart from 3, who were incorrectly randomized prior to, rather than after, their baseline hysteroscopy and were then excluded for not fulfilling the preset operative criteria without contributing any effectiveness data to the study. There were 163 patients randomized in total. The mITT population includes 163-3= 160 patients; 75 in the Womed Leaf group and 85 in the Control group.
Change of AFS score between pre-adhesiolysis and second-look hysteroscopy (AFS) score The scale used to assess the severity of intrauterine adhesions is the American Fertility Society score. It is a 12 points composite score that adds-up 3 subcomponents: - Extend of adhesions (1 = less than 1/3 of the uterine cavity involved with adhesions to 4 = more than 2/3 of the uterine cavity involved with adhesions), * Type of adhesions (1 = Filmy adhesions to 4 = dense adhesions) * Menstrual pattern (0= normal to 4 = amenorrhea). The final score allows the following prognostic classification: 1-4 = mild disease, 5-8 = moderate disease 9-12 = severe disease
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Womed Leaf
n=75 Participants
Womed Leaf resorbable barrier is inserted right after adhesiolysis.
|
Control
n=85 Participants
No IUA barrier
|
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy - IUA Severity
|
5.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksAdverse events up to second look hysteroscopy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Womed Leaf
n=77 Participants
Womed Leaf resorbable barrier is inserted right after adhesiolysis.
|
Control
n=86 Participants
No IUA barrier
|
|---|---|---|
|
Safety - Adverse Events
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksPercentage of patients who have improved from severe to mild adhesions or from severe to no adhesions or from moderate to no adhesions
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksAverage of AFS score component "extent of cavity involved"
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksAverage of AFS score component "extent of cavity involved"
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksAverage of AFS score
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksAverage of the change of the AFS score component "Extent of IUA"
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksAverage of the change of the AFS score component "type of IUA"
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksAverage of the change of the AFS score component "Menstrual Pattern"
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksPercentage of patients who have AFS \< 5
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksRate of patients who don't have adhesion
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksRate of ECGE stage
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksLevel of post-operative pain on a numeric rating scale, with 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksLevel of discomfort related to vaginal discharge on a numeric rating scale, with 0 = no discomfort and 10 = extremely disturbing
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksTiming of vaginal discharge as recalled by the patient
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksDuration of the vaginal discharge as recalled by the patient
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksQualitative description of the vaginal discharge as recalled by the patient
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeks, 1 year, 2 yearsChange of menstrual pattern
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy or scheduled later up to one yearReintervention rate, during second look hysteroscopy or scheduled later up to one year
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: After second look to one yearNumber of adhesiolysis procedures after second look to one year
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 year, 2 years, 3 yearsPregnancy rate defined as presence of foetal sac or heartbeat by ultrasound at 1 year and 2 years, whether spontaneous or IVF
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 year 2 years, 3 yearsLive birth rate at 1 year and 2 years
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPregnancy complication rate
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsTime to pregnancy (i.e. time between the second look hysteroscopy and pregnancy start)
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksIUA severity according to Chinese scoring system (for patients enrolled in China only)
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At second look hysteroscopy between 4 and 8 weeksPercentage of patients with an improvement of one clinical category i.e from Severe to Moderate or from Moderate to Mild
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Womed Leaf
Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Womed Leaf
n=77 participants at risk
IUA prevention: The novel intrauterine barrier film (Womed Leaf) is inserted immediately after completion of the hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
|
Control
n=86 participants at risk
No IUA prevention - no placebo after adhesiolysis
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/77 • 8 weeks
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/77 • 8 weeks
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuralgia
|
0.00%
0/77 • 8 weeks
|
1.2%
1/86 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Uterine perforation
|
1.3%
1/77 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
0.00%
0/86 • 8 weeks
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test abnormal
|
1.3%
1/77 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
0.00%
0/86 • 8 weeks
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral pain
|
1.3%
1/77 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
0.00%
0/86 • 8 weeks
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal pruritus
|
1.3%
1/77 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
0.00%
0/86 • 8 weeks
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Cervix disorder
|
1.3%
1/77 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
0.00%
0/86 • 8 weeks
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
1.3%
1/77 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
0.00%
0/86 • 8 weeks
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place