Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
27 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-03-27
2006-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Of the 3 non-completers, 1 had a re-occurrence of a previous illness, another relocated, and data from the 3rd was omitted following baseline samples that showed high triglyceride concentrations (.5 mmol/L). A 2-period, randomized cross-over design was used. Each participant completed two 5-wk diet interventions in a randomly assigned order with a 4-wk washout period between the test diet interventions. The men consumed 5 ground beef patties per week for 5 wk during each dietary intervention (25 patties of each type for each ground beef intervention). The 2 interventions were low-monounsaturated fat ground beef and high-monounsaturated fat ground beef. To facilitate product distribution and blood sampling, participants were assigned to 1 of 2 groups, which were balanced with regard to age, body weight, and total cholesterol concentration at the initial screening. Group 1 began the study 2 wk before group 2. Both groups rotated through both test diets, but the pattern in which they crossed over differed between groups. Therefore, crossovers included all possible rotation sequences. Body weights were recorded weekly.
Collection and analysis of blood samples Prior to the initiation of the dietary treatments and at the end of each diet phase and after 5 minutes of seated rest, blood was collected from the participants into vacutainers from a vein in the antecubital fossa using standard phlebotomy procedures. Plasma was harvested from the blood collected with EDTA and lipoproteins preserved in plasma prior to lipoprotein separation using density gradient ultracentrifugation employing human density intervals. Determination of LDL lipoprotein diameters was by non-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Particle diameters were determined by comparison with migration distances of standard proteins of known hydrated diameter. Plasma total lipoproteins isolated as the d \< 1.2 kg/L fraction of plasma were separated on the basis of diameter with a gel-filtration chromatographic system to determine the relative distribution of plasma total cholesterol among very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), LDL, and HDL lipoprotein classes. Concentrations of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose in plasma were determined by separate enzymatic assays. Concentrations of serum insulin and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were assayed using commercially available ELISA kits according to the manufacturers' instructions.
Statistical analysis We compared nutrient and dietary exchange data and final plasma glucose, lipids, insulin, CRP, and lipoprotein particle diameters to their corresponding baseline values by paired t test. Data were tested for unequal variance by the Breusch- Pagan/Cook-Weisberg test for heteroscedasticity to test the null hypothesis that the error variances were all equal. Values for changes from baseline for the low- and high-MUFA treatment groups were compared by 1-way analysis of variance, with ground beef type as the treatment effect. Associations among plasma analytes were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. P-values were considered significant at P \< 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Low-MUFA ground beef
Participants consumed ground beef low in monounsaturated fatty acids.
Ground beef
Ground beef naturally low in monounsaturated fatty acids or naturally high in monounsaturated fatty acids
High-MUFA ground beef
Participants consumed ground beef high in monounsaturated fatty acids.
Ground beef
Ground beef naturally low in monounsaturated fatty acids or naturally high in monounsaturated fatty acids
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ground beef
Ground beef naturally low in monounsaturated fatty acids or naturally high in monounsaturated fatty acids
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
23 Years
60 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Texas A&M University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen Smith, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Texas A&M University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gilmore LA, Walzem RL, Crouse SF, Smith DR, Adams TH, Vaidyanathan V, Cao X, Smith SB. Consumption of high-oleic acid ground beef increases HDL-cholesterol concentration but both high- and low-oleic acid ground beef decrease HDL particle diameter in normocholesterolemic men. J Nutr. 2011 Jun;141(6):1188-94. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.136085. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB2005-0435
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id