Letrozole Plus Metronomic Capecitabine as First-line Treatment for Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT04942899
Last Updated: 2023-03-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-08-30
2025-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Letrozole and Metronomic Capecitabine in ER-positive HER2 Negative Advanced Breast Cancer (B-001 Study)
NCT04571437
Capecitabine in Combination With Aromatase Inhibitor Versus Aromatase Inhibitors, in Hormonal Receptor Positive Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients, Randomized Controlled Study
NCT04012918
Oral Metronomic Capecitabine Combined With Pyrotinib in ADC-treated HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT07019337
Metronomic Capecitabine Plus Aromatase Inhibitor for First Line Treatment in HR(+), Her2(-) Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT02767661
Irinotecan/Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine in Patients Treated With A/T for HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT01501669
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In 2021, an estimated 281,550 new cases of invasive breast cancer are expected to be diagnosed in women in the U.S., along with 49,290 new cases of non-invasive (in situ) breast cancer.
About 43,600 women in the U.S. are expected to die in 2021 from breast cancer. Death rates have been steady in women under 50 since 2007, but have continued to drop in women over 50. The overall death rate from breast cancer decreased by 1% per year from 2013 to 2018. These decreases are thought to be the result of treatment advances and earlier detection through screening.
According to the World Health Organization, breast cancer became the most common cancer globally as of 2021, accounting for 12% of all new annual cancer cases worldwide.
Breast cancer is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous disease exhibiting substantial differences concerning biological behavior and requiring distinct therapeutic interventions. There has been a continuous decline in mortality over recent years due to improvements in early diagnosis and the increased availability of more effective treatments. However, despite these improvements, The treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who developed disease progression on first-line hormonal treatment that included aromatase inhibitors (AI) represents a challenge as those patients ultimately develop resistant disease unresponsive to standard lines of estrogen receptors (ER) blockade. Capecitabine is an oral chemotherapy that mimics continuous infusion of 5-FU with known activity in MBC. It might be preferred because of its tolerability and relatively lower toxicity than other chemotherapeutic agents. Metronomic chemotherapy is defined as the frequent (daily, many times a week, or weekly) or continuous administration of low dose chemotherapeutic agents, without prolonged drug-free intervals. This way of administration improves the antiangiogenic activity of chemotherapy. Another important advantage of this approach is the significant reduction in toxicity. Capecitabine's pharmacokinetics and high safety profile make it a suitable drug for metronomic administration. Many studies reported that the overall response rate can be improved by (15.8-21.7%) when metronomic chemotherapy is combined with aromatase inhibitors. This combination can also decrease the level of both the Ki-67 index and VEGF-A significantly in the tumor tissue. It was reported that the patients who received letrozole plus metronomic chemotherapy achieved a higher overall response rate (ORR) than those who received letrozole alone (87.7% vs 71.9% respectively.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
letrozole
concurrent capecitabine 500 mg three times daily in combination with letrozole 2.5 mg orally once daily.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Confirmed diagnosis of hormonal receptor positive (HR+)/Her2-negative breast cancer
* If the patient is pre-/peri- menopausal, a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist will be given for at least 28 days before randomization or ovarian ablation or suppression by surgery or radiotherapy
* Measurable disease defined by RECIST version 1.1,
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2
* Adequate organ and marrow function
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients diagnosed with central nervous system metastases
* Second primary malignancy
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yosra farghaly sayed mahmoud
Principal Investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shankar A, Rath G, Roy S, Malik A, Bhandari R, Kishor K, Barnwal K, Upadyaya S, Srivastava V, Singh R. Level of awareness of cervical and breast cancer risk factors and safe practices among college teachers of different states in india: do awareness programmes have an impact on adoption of safe practices? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(3):927-32. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.3.927.
Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005 May 14-20;365(9472):1687-717. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0.
Winkfield KM, Harris JR. Effective local therapy and long-term survival in breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2009 Jul;23(8):669-75.
Schwartzberg LS, Wang G, Somer BG, Blakely LJ, Wheeler BM, Walker MS, Stepanski EJ, Houts AC. Phase II trial of fulvestrant with metronomic capecitabine for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2014 Feb;14(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J, Allman D, Bajetta E, Boyer M, Bugat R, Findlay M, Frings S, Jahn M, McKendrick J, Osterwalder B, Perez-Manga G, Rosso R, Rougier P, Schmiegel WH, Seitz JF, Thompson P, Vieitez JM, Weitzel C, Harper P; Xeloda Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Nov 1;19(21):4097-106. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.21.4097.
Seidman AD, O'Shaughnessy J, Misset JL. Single-agent capecitabine: a reference treatment for taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer? Oncologist. 2002;7 Suppl 6:20-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.7-suppl_6-20.
Walko CM, Lindley C. Capecitabine: a review. Clin Ther. 2005 Jan;27(1):23-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.01.005.
Munzone E, Di Pietro A, Goldhirsch A, Minchella I, Verri E, Cossu Rocca M, Marenghi C, Curigliano G, Radice D, Adamoli L, Nole F. Metronomic administration of pegylated liposomal-doxorubicin in extensively pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients: a mono-institutional case-series report. Breast. 2010 Feb;19(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Nov 1.
Mehta RS. Dose-dense and/or metronomic schedules of specific chemotherapies consolidate the chemosensitivity of triple-negative breast cancer: a step toward reversing triple-negative paradox. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 1;26(19):3286-8; author reply 3288. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1116. No abstract available.
Emmenegger U, Kerbel RS. Five years of clinical experience with metronomic chemotherapy: achievements and perspectives. Onkologie. 2007 Dec;30(12):606-8. doi: 10.1159/000111479. Epub 2007 Nov 30. No abstract available.
Bottini A, Generali D, Brizzi MP, Fox SB, Bersiga A, Bonardi S, Allevi G, Aguggini S, Bodini G, Milani M, Dionisio R, Bernardi C, Montruccoli A, Bruzzi P, Harris AL, Dogliotti L, Berruti A. Randomized phase II trial of letrozole and letrozole plus low-dose metronomic oral cyclophosphamide as primary systemic treatment in elderly breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 1;24(22):3623-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5773.
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AIs with chemotherapy in MBC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.