Trial Outcomes & Findings for FDA Cigarette Warning Labels: Eye Tracking Study (NCT NCT04936724)

NCT ID: NCT04936724

Last Updated: 2024-07-22

Results Overview

We defined areas of interest (AOIs) encompassing the image and text portions of each PWL. For each AOI, we examined attention measures of latency (time until the first fixation in the AOI; i.e., how quickly attention is drawn to the AOI), latency duration (length of the first fixation; i.e., how long the AOI is initially viewed), and total fixation time (sum of all fixations in the AOI; i.e., overall viewing allocation, accounting for viewing the same AOI multiple times). Analyses examined the mean of each outcome across the four PWLs within each condition.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

70 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Day 1

Results posted on

2024-07-22

Participant Flow

70 adult daily cigarette users completed a single laboratory session. We recruited non-treatment-seeking adults who use cigarettes daily to complete a single session utilizing a randomized, parallel design. We recruited individuals from the greater Philadelphia area using print and digital media advertisements.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Condition A (Lesser-known Harms)
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting lesser-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Condition B (Well-known Harms)
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting the well-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Overall Study
STARTED
35
35
Overall Study
COMPLETED
35
35
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

FDA Cigarette Warning Labels: Eye Tracking Study

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Condition A (Lesser-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting lesser-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Condition B (Well-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting the well-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Total
n=70 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
≥21 and ≤ 65
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex at birth · Male
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex at birth · Female
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Black or African American
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · White or Caucasian
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Other
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
35 participants
n=5 Participants
35 participants
n=7 Participants
70 participants
n=5 Participants
Smoking History Information_Past 7-day cigarettes per day
13.6 Cigarettes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=5 Participants
15.1 Cigarettes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 • n=7 Participants
14.4 Cigarettes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 • n=5 Participants
Smoking History Information_Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND)
4.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=5 Participants
5.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=7 Participants
4.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=5 Participants
Smoking History Information_Years Smoked
33.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 • n=5 Participants
32.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=7 Participants
32.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=5 Participants
Smoking History_Type of Cigarette
Menthol
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
Smoking History_Type of Cigarette
Non-Menthol
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
21 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

We defined areas of interest (AOIs) encompassing the image and text portions of each PWL. For each AOI, we examined attention measures of latency (time until the first fixation in the AOI; i.e., how quickly attention is drawn to the AOI), latency duration (length of the first fixation; i.e., how long the AOI is initially viewed), and total fixation time (sum of all fixations in the AOI; i.e., overall viewing allocation, accounting for viewing the same AOI multiple times). Analyses examined the mean of each outcome across the four PWLs within each condition.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Condition A (Lesser-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting lesser-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Condition B (Well-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting the well-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Attention: Latency (Time Until First Fixation) for Image
2612 ms
Standard Deviation 308
978 ms
Standard Deviation 313

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

We defined areas of interest (AOIs) encompassing the image and text portions of each PWL. For each AOI, we examined attention measures of latency (time until the first fixation in the AOI; i.e., how quickly attention is drawn to the AOI), latency duration (length of the first fixation; i.e., how long the AOI is initially viewed), and total fixation time (sum of all fixations in the AOI; i.e., overall viewing allocation, accounting for viewing the same AOI multiple times). Analyses examined the mean of each outcome across the four PWLs within each condition.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Condition A (Lesser-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting lesser-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Condition B (Well-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting the well-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Attention: Latency (Time Until First Fixation) for Text
1001 ms
Standard Deviation 214
798 ms
Standard Deviation 218

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

We defined areas of interest (AOIs) encompassing the image and text portions of each PWL. For each AOI, we examined attention measures of latency (time until the first fixation in the AOI; i.e., how quickly attention is drawn to the AOI), latency duration (length of the first fixation; i.e., how long the AOI is initially viewed), and total fixation time (sum of all fixations in the AOI; i.e., overall viewing allocation, accounting for viewing the same AOI multiple times). Analyses examined the mean of each outcome across the four PWLs within each condition.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Condition A (Lesser-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting lesser-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Condition B (Well-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting the well-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Attention: Latency Duration (Time of Fixation) for Image
160 ms
Standard Deviation 11
183 ms
Standard Deviation 13

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

We defined areas of interest (AOIs) encompassing the image and text portions of each PWL. For each AOI, we examined attention measures of latency (time until the first fixation in the AOI; i.e., how quickly attention is drawn to the AOI), latency duration (length of the first fixation; i.e., how long the AOI is initially viewed), and total fixation time (sum of all fixations in the AOI; i.e., overall viewing allocation, accounting for viewing the same AOI multiple times). Analyses examined the mean of each outcome across the four PWLs within each condition.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Condition A (Lesser-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting lesser-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Condition B (Well-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting the well-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Attention: Latency Duration (Time of Fixation) for Text
150 ms
Standard Deviation 9
165 ms
Standard Deviation 9

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

We defined areas of interest (AOIs) encompassing the image and text portions of each PWL. For each AOI, we examined attention measures of latency (time until the first fixation in the AOI; i.e., how quickly attention is drawn to the AOI), latency duration (length of the first fixation; i.e., how long the AOI is initially viewed), and total fixation time (sum of all fixations in the AOI; i.e., overall viewing allocation, accounting for viewing the same AOI multiple times). Analyses examined the mean of each outcome across the four PWLs within each condition.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Condition A (Lesser-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting lesser-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Condition B (Well-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting the well-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Attention: Total Fixation Time for Image
3532 ms
Standard Deviation 524
7887 ms
Standard Deviation 532

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

We defined areas of interest (AOIs) encompassing the image and text portions of each PWL. For each AOI, we examined attention measures of latency (time until the first fixation in the AOI; i.e., how quickly attention is drawn to the AOI), latency duration (length of the first fixation; i.e., how long the AOI is initially viewed), and total fixation time (sum of all fixations in the AOI; i.e., overall viewing allocation, accounting for viewing the same AOI multiple times). Analyses examined the mean of each outcome across the four PWLs within each condition.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Condition A (Lesser-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting lesser-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Condition B (Well-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting the well-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Attention: Total Fixation Time for Text
4889 ms
Standard Deviation 436
3643 ms
Standard Deviation 443

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Participants will view 11 warning label images and would be required to identify the warning label images they saw during their eye tracking portion of the session. This outcome measure (Recall -Image) was assessed in a percentage unit of measure. The percentages are not whole numbers for these items because it's the mean % correct for the condition, or the average percent correct across the four images for the group. The results in the Outcome Measure Data table demonstrate the percentage of participants who correctly identified the images from their condition (4 of the 11 images presented to participants were from their randomized condition; A or B).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Condition A (Lesser-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting lesser-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Condition B (Well-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting the well-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Recall: Participants Ability to Recall Condition Image
98.6 percentage of correct images
Standard Error 1.0
95.7 percentage of correct images
Standard Error 1.6

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Participants will view 11 warning label text statements and would be required to identify the warning label text statements they saw during their eye tracking portion of the session. This outcome measure (Recall -Text) was assessed in a percentage unit of measure. The percentages are not whole numbers for these items because it's the mean % correct for the condition, or the average percent correct across the four images for the group. The results in the Outcome Measure Data table demonstrate the percentage of participants who correctly identified the text statements from their condition (4 of the 11 images presented to participants were from their randomized condition; A or B).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Condition A (Lesser-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting lesser-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Condition B (Well-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting the well-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Recall: Participants Ability to Recall Condition Text
82.9 percentage of correct text
Standard Error 3.9
86.5 percentage of correct text
Standard Error 3.1

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

All participants will select harms caused by tobacco from a list of health issues and diseases, before as well as after viewing the warning labels on the screen. Pre and post warning label exposure knowledge of smoking harms were assessed by using an exploratory scale that asked participants if cigarette smoking caused a list of 18 health conditions with a 5-point response scale, (1=definitely yes 2= probably yes, 3 = might or might not, 4 = probably not, 5 = definitely not).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Condition A (Lesser-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting lesser-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Condition B (Well-known Harms)
n=35 Participants
Participants randomized to this condition will view cigarette warning labels highlighting the well-known harms of tobacco use. Pictorial Warning Labels: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions and will view 4 pictorial warning labels from the assigned group for an eye-tracking task.
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Harm to Children
1.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Type II Diabetes
2.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
3.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Stunted Fetal Growth
1.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Heart Disease
1.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Stroke
1.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Macular Degeneration
2.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
3.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
COVID-19
4.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
4.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Head and Neck Cancer
1.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
3.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Hearing Loss
3.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Lung Disease
1.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Vertigo
3.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
3.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Cataracts
1.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
3.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Depression
2.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
3.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Erectile Dysfunction
3.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
3.3 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Bladder Cancer
1.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
2.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Bloody Urine
1.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
3.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Knowledge of Smoking Harms
Blindness
2.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
3.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2

Adverse Events

Condition A (Lesser-known Harms)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Condition B (Well-known Harms)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Andrew Strasser Ph.D.

University of Pennsylvania

Phone: 215-746-5788

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place