Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of BIO89-100 in Subjects With Biopsy-confirmed Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) (NCT NCT04929483)
NCT ID: NCT04929483
Last Updated: 2026-01-06
Results Overview
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) was the sum of the scores of steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning. NAS score ranged from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating worse disease severity. Resolution of NASH was defined as the total absence of ballooning (score=0) and absent or mild inflammation (score=0 to 1). NASH clinical research system (CRN) fibrosis is staged on a 0-4 scale: 0 (none); 1 (perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis); 2 (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis); 3 (bridging fibrosis); 4 (cirrhosis). Worsening of fibrosis was defined as progression of fibrosis greater than or equal to (≥) 1 stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
222 participants
Week 24
2026-01-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
Participants received pegozafermin 15 milligrams (mg) once weekly (QW) as a subcutaneous (SC) injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Placebo (Extension) Only
Participants who received placebo QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study were re-randomized to receive placebo QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study. Participants who received placebo Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study continued on placebo Q2W for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Extension Study (24 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
19
|
53
|
42
|
0
|
38
|
19
|
|
Extension Study (24 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
3
|
8
|
0
|
4
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
STARTED
|
21
|
73
|
57
|
71
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
|
21
|
72
|
57
|
69
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
Safety Analysis Set
|
21
|
72
|
57
|
69
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Analysis Set
|
14
|
66
|
51
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
MRI-PDFF Analysis Set
|
14
|
61
|
49
|
57
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
Full Analysis Set
|
14
|
66
|
51
|
61
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
20
|
59
|
51
|
63
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
14
|
6
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
|
Extension Study (24 Weeks)
STARTED
|
20
|
56
|
50
|
0
|
42
|
19
|
|
Extension Study (24 Weeks)
Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
|
20
|
56
|
48
|
0
|
42
|
19
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
Participants received pegozafermin 15 milligrams (mg) once weekly (QW) as a subcutaneous (SC) injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Placebo (Extension) Only
Participants who received placebo QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study were re-randomized to receive placebo QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study. Participants who received placebo Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study continued on placebo Q2W for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
1
|
6
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Main Study (24 Weeks)
Randomized in error
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Extension Study (24 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Extension Study (24 Weeks)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Extension Study (24 Weeks)
Other than specified
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Extension Study (24 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of BIO89-100 in Subjects With Biopsy-confirmed Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=21 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=73 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=57 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=71 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study.
|
Total
n=222 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.45 • n=37 Participants
|
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.15 • n=56 Participants
|
55.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.23 • n=82 Participants
|
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.01 • n=31 Participants
|
55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
118 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
104 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
9 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
137 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
18 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
208 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=37 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=56 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=82 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of investigational product (IP). Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) was the sum of the scores of steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning. NAS score ranged from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating worse disease severity. Resolution of NASH was defined as the total absence of ballooning (score=0) and absent or mild inflammation (score=0 to 1). NASH clinical research system (CRN) fibrosis is staged on a 0-4 scale: 0 (none); 1 (perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis); 2 (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis); 3 (bridging fibrosis); 4 (cirrhosis). Worsening of fibrosis was defined as progression of fibrosis greater than or equal to (≥) 1 stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=14 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=53 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=43 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=54 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Number of Participants With Histological Resolution of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) Without Worsening of Fibrosis
|
5 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Worsening of NASH was defined as increase in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) for ballooning, inflammation, or steatosis. NAS was the sum of the scores of steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning. NAS score ranged from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating worse disease severity. Fibrosis improvement was defined as ≥1-stage decrease in NASH CRN fibrosis score. NASH CRN fibrosis was staged on a 0-4 scale: 0 (none); 1 (perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis); 2 (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis); 3 (bridging fibrosis); 4 (cirrhosis).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=14 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=53 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=43 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=54 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Number of Participants Who Achieved Improvement of Fibrosis ≥1 Stage Without Worsening of NASH
|
3 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
NAS was the sum of the scores of steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning. NAS score ranged from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating worse disease severity. Worsening of fibrosis was defined as progression of fibrosis ≥1 stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score. NASH CRN fibrosis is staged on a 0-4 scale: 0 (none); 1 (perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis); 2 (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis); 3 (bridging fibrosis); 4 (cirrhosis).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=14 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=53 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=43 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=54 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Number of Participants With at Least a 2-Point Improvement in NAS and no Worsening of Fibrosis
|
5 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
NAS was the sum of the scores of steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning. NAS score ranged from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating worse disease severity. Resolution of NASH was defined as the total absence of ballooning (score=0) and absent or mild inflammation (score=0 to 1). Fibrosis improvement was defined as ≥1-stage decrease in NASH CRN fibrosis score. NASH CRN fibrosis was staged on a 0-4 scale: 0 (none); 1 (perisinusoidal or periportal fibrosis); 2 (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis); 3 (bridging fibrosis); 4 (cirrhosis).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=14 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=53 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=43 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=54 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Number of Participants With NASH Resolution and Fibrosis Improvement ≥1 Stage
|
2 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
A responder was defined as achieving ≥2 point improvement in NAS score and are MRI-PDFF responders and ALT responders at Week 24. NAS was the sum of the scores of steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning. NAS score ranged from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating worse disease severity. MRI-PDFF responder was defined as ≥30% reduction from baseline in liver fat by MRI-PDFF. ALT responder was defined as ≥17 units/liter (U/L) or ≥30% reduction from baseline in ALT.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=14 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=53 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=43 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=54 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Number of Participants With at Least a 2-point Improvement in NAS Score and Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) Responders and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Responders
|
4 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=12 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=57 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=45 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=57 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Triglycerides
|
-5.79 Percent change
Standard Deviation 19.473
|
-14.87 Percent change
Standard Deviation 54.765
|
-7.79 Percent change
Standard Deviation 29.612
|
1.02 Percent change
Standard Deviation 31.425
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=11 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=55 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=44 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=56 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-c)
|
20.28 Percent change
Standard Deviation 74.840
|
-0.42 Percent change
Standard Deviation 35.290
|
-5.64 Percent change
Standard Deviation 31.944
|
0.32 Percent change
Standard Deviation 30.811
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=12 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=57 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=45 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=57 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-c)
|
-3.04 Percent change
Standard Deviation 18.421
|
-6.94 Percent change
Standard Deviation 21.260
|
-6.95 Percent change
Standard Deviation 24.120
|
-0.46 Percent change
Standard Deviation 24.081
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=12 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=57 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=45 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=57 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-c)
|
4.69 Percent change
Standard Deviation 13.441
|
15.82 Percent change
Standard Deviation 20.376
|
7.31 Percent change
Standard Deviation 18.690
|
-2.01 Percent change
Standard Deviation 13.592
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=13 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=56 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=46 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=57 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Adiponectin
|
22.73 Percent change
Standard Deviation 44.045
|
31.36 Percent change
Standard Deviation 49.215
|
26.60 Percent change
Standard Deviation 46.353
|
-6.28 Percent change
Standard Deviation 23.770
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=14 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=57 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=45 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=56 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycated Hemoglobin)
|
-2.24 Percent change
Standard Deviation 13.039
|
-3.74 Percent change
Standard Deviation 11.216
|
-2.00 Percent change
Standard Deviation 11.742
|
-0.52 Percent change
Standard Deviation 9.012
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and 24Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for specified time points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=14 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=61 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=47 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=57 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase
Change at Week 12
|
-39.68 Percent change
Standard Deviation 33.615
|
-42.04 Percent change
Standard Deviation 23.044
|
-35.42 Percent change
Standard Deviation 28.874
|
-8.62 Percent change
Standard Deviation 35.051
|
—
|
|
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase
Change at Week 24
|
-39.28 Percent change
Standard Deviation 31.478
|
-42.73 Percent change
Standard Deviation 25.218
|
-31.33 Percent change
Standard Deviation 43.053
|
-0.41 Percent change
Standard Deviation 48.798
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and 24Population: MRI-PDFF analysis set included all participants in the FAS who had a baseline and at least one follow-up MRI-PDFF assessment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for specified time points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=14 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=61 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=49 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=57 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction By Magnetic Resonance Imaging - (MRI-PDFF)
Change at Week 12
|
-45.05 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 25.857
|
-57.07 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 19.563
|
-50.63 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 21.225
|
-0.53 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 42.062
|
—
|
|
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction By Magnetic Resonance Imaging - (MRI-PDFF)
Change at Week 24
|
-27.92 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 35.209
|
-51.05 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 24.065
|
-42.90 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 40.257
|
-5.80 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 47.605
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12 and 24Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for specified time points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=13 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=62 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=49 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=55 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Type III Collagen Propeptide (Pro-C3)
Change at Week 12
|
-35.34 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 26.673
|
-9.51 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 37.151
|
-13.84 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 25.420
|
10.57 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 33.392
|
—
|
|
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Type III Collagen Propeptide (Pro-C3)
Change at Week 24
|
-17.10 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 34.345
|
-17.76 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 28.250
|
-15.22 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 27.429
|
9.46 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 45.403
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose at Week 12 and 24Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set included all participants in the FAS who had sufficient data to adequately characterize the trough serum pegozafermin concentrations and had no other events or protocol violations that would adversely affect results, such as not completing the full dose. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for specified time points.
Serum trough concentration (ng/mL) of pegozafermin taken from pre-dose samples.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=13 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=50 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=36 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Study: Trough Serum Concentration of Pegozafermin
Week 12
|
197.833 nanograms/milliliter
Standard Deviation 110.097
|
534.289 nanograms/milliliter
Standard Deviation 375.149
|
81.699 nanograms/milliliter
Standard Deviation 77.099
|
—
|
—
|
|
Main Study: Trough Serum Concentration of Pegozafermin
Week 24
|
168.127 nanograms/milliliter
Standard Deviation 158.749
|
691.424 nanograms/milliliter
Standard Deviation 718.495
|
84.033 nanograms/milliliter
Standard Deviation 77.896
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Baseline was prior to dosing on Day 1 of the main study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=14 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=48 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=38 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=32 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
n=19 Participants
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main and Extension Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase
|
-28.51 Percent change
Standard Deviation 37.164
|
-45.08 Percent change
Standard Deviation 25.068
|
-38.05 Percent change
Standard Deviation 28.256
|
-5.03 Percent change
Standard Deviation 43.918
|
-31.71 Percent change
Standard Deviation 46.868
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48Population: FAS included all enrolled participants with confirmed fibrosis stage F2 or F3 and NAS ≥4 at baseline per independent review by a 3-pathologist panel who were eligible and assigned a randomization number in the study and received at least 1 dose of IP. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Baseline was prior to dosing on Day 1 of the main study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=13 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=47 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=37 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=32 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
n=18 Participants
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main and Extension Study: Percent Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Type III Collagen Propeptide (Pro-C3)
|
-7.89 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 21.069
|
-16.82 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 23.675
|
-14.96 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 21.342
|
1.64 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 33.082
|
-17.22 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 23.053
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48Population: MRI-PDFF analysis set included all participants in the FAS who had a baseline and at least one follow-up MRI-PDFF assessment. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Baseline was prior to dosing on Day 1 of the main study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=13 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=48 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=40 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=32 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
n=19 Participants
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main and Extension Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction By Magnetic Resonance Imaging - (MRI-PDFF)
|
-23.93 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 33.557
|
-48.75 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 29.717
|
-25.93 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 50.980
|
-3.15 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 47.992
|
-59.14 Percent Change
Standard Deviation 25.807
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose at Week 48Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set included all participants in the FAS who had sufficient data to adequately characterize the trough serum pegozafermin concentrations and had no other events or protocol violations that would adversely affect results, such as not completing the full dose. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Serum trough concentration (ng/mL) of pegozafermin taken from pre-dose samples.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=10 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=35 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=25 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=10 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main and Extension Study: Trough Serum Concentration of Pegozafermin
|
206.54 nanograms/milliliter
Standard Deviation 93.104
|
471.28 nanograms/milliliter
Standard Deviation 397.691
|
111.00 nanograms/milliliter
Standard Deviation 88.644
|
553.45 nanograms/milliliter
Standard Deviation 651.882
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 51Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of IP, whether or not considered related to the IP. TEAEs were defined as AEs that started or worsened on or after the first dose of study IP up to Week 51. An SAE was an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for the AE, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event or reaction. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Main Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=21 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=72 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=57 Participants
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main Study: Placebo Pooled
n=50 Participants
Participants received placebo matched to pegozafermin QW or Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
n=19 Participants
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
TEAEs
|
21 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
46 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Placebo (Extension) Only
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=21 participants at risk
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=72 participants at risk
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=57 participants at risk
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Placebo (Extension) Only
n=50 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study were re-randomized to receive placebo QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study. Participants who received placebo Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study continued on placebo Q2W for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
n=19 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Liver injury
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal bacteraemia
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain stem haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lumbar radiculopathy
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Spinal claudication
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Diastolic dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Blepharitis
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tibia fracture
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mental disorder
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Post-traumatic stress disorder
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis superficial
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 15 mg QW
n=21 participants at risk
Participants received pegozafermin 15 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 30 mg QW
n=72 participants at risk
Participants received pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W
n=57 participants at risk
Participants received pegozafermin 44 mg Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study and for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Placebo (Extension) Only
n=50 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study were re-randomized to receive placebo QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study. Participants who received placebo Q2W as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the main study continued on placebo Q2W for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
Main and Extension Study: Placebo (Main) and Pegozafermin 30 mg QW (Extension)
n=19 participants at risk
Participants who received placebo QW in the main study were re-randomized to receive pegozafermin 30 mg QW as a SC injection for 24 weeks in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Cerumen impaction
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hypochromic anaemia
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hypogonadism
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.0%
5/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
11.1%
8/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
8.0%
4/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.0%
5/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
23.8%
5/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
25.0%
18/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
15.8%
9/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.0%
5/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Frequent bowel movements
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
23.8%
5/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
36.1%
26/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
19.3%
11/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.0%
5/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
26.3%
5/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
18.1%
13/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site bruising
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.0%
5/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
15.3%
11/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
8.3%
6/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
21.1%
4/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site rash
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
9.7%
7/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
General disorders
Vaccination site joint pain
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
19.4%
14/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
14.0%
8/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
18.0%
9/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
15.8%
3/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
14.0%
8/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
13.9%
10/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
8.0%
4/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incisional hernia
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Investigations
Cortisol increased
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Investigations
SARS-CoV-2 test positive
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Increased appetite
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
15.3%
11/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
7.0%
4/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin D deficiency
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
14.3%
3/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
8.0%
4/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
9.7%
7/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteopenia
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
8.3%
6/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.5%
6/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
6.0%
3/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
21.1%
4/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tension headache
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
9.5%
2/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.0%
2/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
4.8%
1/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
3/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.0%
1/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
19.0%
4/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive urgency
|
0.00%
0/21 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
0.00%
0/50 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Baseline up to Week 51
Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IP. As pre-specified, data for the placebo arm was combined for the main and extension study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place