Comparative Effectiveness in the Management of Irreversible Pulpitis

NCT ID: NCT04922229

Last Updated: 2025-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

138 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-12-01

Study Completion Date

2031-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This project addresses a central question within the practice of dentistry: Is a pulpotomy procedure effective in the treatment of a tooth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and normal periapex? In addition, the project seeks to identify clinical and molecular biomarkers that are predictive of the success of pulpotomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study, patients will be randomized to two groups. All patients will have a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis with normal apical tissues. The groups will be root canal treatment and pulpotomy. The patients will be followed clinically and radiographically for 2 years following the treatment. Predictors of the outcome of pulpotomy will be clinical and laboratory-based parameters.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Irreversible Pulpitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Root canal treatment (RCT)

For cases with this diagnosis RCT is the standard of care and will be done according to clinically approved protocols

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

RCT

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This is the standard of care for this diagnosis

Pulpotomy

Pulpotomy with tricalcium silicates has shown high clinical success in these cases. However, it is not known how this success compares to RCT under similar conditions and with an intent-to-treat study design, which will be employed here.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pulpotomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

For cases with normal apical tissues, pulpotomy using tricalcium silicates has been shown to have high clinical success. Either partial or complete pulpotomy will be performed depending on the size of pulp exposure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RCT

This is the standard of care for this diagnosis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pulpotomy

For cases with normal apical tissues, pulpotomy using tricalcium silicates has been shown to have high clinical success. Either partial or complete pulpotomy will be performed depending on the size of pulp exposure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Endodontic therapy Therapeutic pulpotomy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Maxillary or mandibular first or second mature permanent molars with carious lesions or restorations (excluding crowns), with signs and symptoms of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (defined as spontaneous pulpal pain and cold hyperalgesia \>30 seconds), and normal apical tissues.
* Tooth is responsive to cold and electrical pulp testing.
* Patients aged ≥12 years for first molars and ≥16 years for second molars.

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of Pulp Necrosis or Apical Periodontitis, preoperatively or upon inspection of an exposure site
* Teeth that are badly broken down and/or are not restorable.
* Teeth with mechanical allodynia assessed by registering bite force that is at least 50N lower than the contralateral side.
* Teeth with radiographic evidence of internal, or external cervical, inflammatory or replacement root resorption, or with complete pulp canal obliteration.
* Radiographic evidence of PDL space wider than three times normal width
* Clinical evidence of swelling or sinus tract
* Periodontal pocket probing depth ≥5 mm in any site around the tooth.
* Clinical evidence of cracks connecting mesial and distal surfaces and/or extending in pulp chamber or associated with periodontal pockets ≥ 5 mm.
* History of taking centrally acting drugs (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants), which interfere with the release of pain mediators and/or modify pain experience, within the previous 6 months.
* Use of medications that affect the host response such as methotrexate, corticosteroids or cyclosporin.
* Patients on immunosuppressive agents, chronic corticosteroid use, autoimmune disease, or other immunocompromising diseases or medications.
* Patients who require IV sedation or general anesthesia for their dental treatment.
* Teeth with full coverage crowns.
* Teeth undergoing active orthodontic movement.
* Teeth that require elective RCTx to place a post for restorative purposes.
* Teeth with no contralateral molars with normal pulp and periapical tissues for bite and pulp testing controls.
* Teeth in the pulpotomy group in which, following complete pulpotomy, bleeding does not stop after 10 minutes with 3-4% hypochlorite cotton pellet. These will be considered treatment failure and treated with RCTx.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ashraf Fouad

Professor and Chair

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ashraf Fouad, DDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sheila Turner, DDS

Role: CONTACT

(205) 934-5045

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sheila Turner

Role: primary

(205) 934-5045

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB-300001234

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effect of Cryotherapy on Postoperative Pain for Pulpotomy
NCT07245004 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1
Pulpotomy vs Pulpectomy Outcome.
NCT02727088 UNKNOWN NA