Pharmacokinetic and PHarmacodynamic Analysis and Evaluation of Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) Between Sexes
NCT ID: NCT04921124
Last Updated: 2021-08-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-24
2021-07-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Oral Doses of PTH134 in Post-menopausal Women
NCT01224717
Effect of PTH(1-34) Treatment on Fracture Healing in Vivo
NCT00741182
Study of Teriparatide in Stress Fracture Healing
NCT04196855
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect of Forsteo (Teriparatide, 1-34-rh-PTH) in Anorexia Nervosa Patients With Low Bone Mineral Density and Increased Bone Fagility (FAN-Trial)
NCT01801397
The Effects of Therapy With Teriparatide on Vascular Compliance and Osteoprotegerin/RANKL
NCT00347737
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Existing data to support the equivalence of teriparatide between sexes is limited. Citrate and calcium infusions have been used to characterise the impact of sex differences on PTH dynamics in twelve women with mean age ± SD of 26.4 ± 1.6 years and 12 men with mean age of 26.6 ± 1.3 years. They reported no between sex differences in serum PTH concentrations. It has also been reported that 2-weeks of intermittent PTH administration in mice was anabolic for cortical bone, with a greater effect observed in male compared with female animals. No studies have investigated between sex PK or PD differences or efficacy of teriparatide injection in humans. By examining this, the present study will help to further our understanding of how teriparatide can be used in men and women.
A review considering a number of trials supported the use of PTH in its licensed indications and demonstrated the efficacy of this drug in both male and female subjects. The evidence base cited in this review is primarily from post-menopausal women in line with the licensed indication.
This study compliments the RETURN trial which is investigating the efficacy of teriparatide for accelerating stress fracture healing in Army infantry recruits (EudraCT: 2018-002130-20). The study is based at the Infantry Training Centre (ITC), which currently predominantly trains men, hence men will form the majority of the RETURN study participants. Opening front line roles to women comes with a well-documented risk of musculoskeletal injury due to the nature of infantry training (HQ Army, 2016). If the results of the RETURN trial are to be extrapolated to women and inform Defence treatment policy for stress fractures, the between sex differences in PK and PD in a population matched to individuals in military training must be established. This study is required if the results of RETURN are to be extrapolated to a female population undergoing military training.
The Gedeon Richter preparation, 'Terossa' will be used in this study as this is the preparation that is being used in the RETURN study. This will control for inter-brand variation.
Nephrogenous cyclic Adenosine Mono Phosphate is a measurement of PTH 1-34 activity at the kidney and can therefore be used to estimate the early biological effects of PTH 1-34 in humans.
The research questions are;
1. Is there a difference in the PK or PD profile of teriparatide subcutaneous injection between men and women?
2. Are the PK and PD measurements reliable and reproducible? The cohort for investigation is young healthy (free from immune, cardiovascular or metabolic diseases) men and women, military or physically trained civilians, free from illness, and matched to a military population in training, based on age, body mass index (BMI) and absence of medical conditions that would be a bar to entry to the Army (Can I Join The Army \| Find Out if You Are Eligible \| British Army - British Army Jobs (mod.uk) \[Accessed 16/01/2021\]).
The intervention involves a single dose of teriparatide administered on 2 occasions.
Participants will be closely monitored for 12 hours, plus a further 12 hours urine collection followed by a 24-hour washout period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment
Teriparatide, 20 µg Subcutaneous (S/C) per day.
Two doses in total.
Teriparatide
PTH(1-34) cartridge and pen device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Teriparatide
PTH(1-34) cartridge and pen device
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Be able to comply with protocol;
* Be able to adequately understand written and spoken English;
* Be aged between 18 and 36 years;
* Have a BMI ≥18.5 and ≤28.0 kg/m2;
* Regularly perform a minimum of 3 sessions / week of 40 minutes or more of moderate or vigorous exercise;
* Be without any clinically significant illness (free from immune, cardiovascular or metabolic diseases and absence of medical conditions that would be a bar to joining the Army),
* Have baseline blood tests within reference range as per screening assessment table (table 1). Minor abnormalities will be assessed by the PI. Participants will still be eligible if these are felt to be of no clinical importance and this decision is documented by the PI;
* Be vitamin D replete (25(OH)D ≥50 nmol/L). Potential participants presenting with 25(OH)D \<50 nmol/L I will be offered supplementation and may be re-screened once their course of treatment is complete
Exclusion Criteria
* Pre-existing hypercalcaemia
* Participants with skeletal malignancies or bone metastases.
* Significant musculoskeletal injury or fracture within the last 6 months. Significance to be determined by the PI.
* Digoxin and any other concurrent therapy that, in the investigators' opinion, would interfere with the evaluation of the safety or efficacy of the study medication.
* Pregnancy, suspected pregnancy or breastfeeding. Female participants must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and be willing and able to use a medically accepted method of birth control (reliable use of oral contraceptive, hormonal intrauterine device, non-hormonal intrauterine device with condom, diaphragm with condom, or condom with spermicide) from the screening visit through to the end of the experimental testing visit or declare that they are abstaining from sexual intercourse from the screening visit through the end of the experimental testing visit or are surgically sterile (have undergone bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy).
* Less than 6 months post-partum.
* Less than 6 months post-breastfeeding.
* Severe renal impairment (eGFR \<30mLs/min/1.73m2).
* Pre-existing metabolic bone diseases including hyperparathyroidism and Paget's disease of the bone.
* Unexplained elevations of total ALP.
* Prior external beam or implant radiation therapy to the skeleton.
* Participating in a concurrent drug trial. Potential participants will be excluded if they have been in receipt of an investigational drug or biological agent within the last 4 weeks (or 5 times the half-life if this is longer) prior to study entry.
18 Years
36 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of East Anglia
OTHER
Ministry of Defence, United Kingdom
OTHER_GOV
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
William Fraser, Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UEA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals Foundation Trust
Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PHAB01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.