Human Versus Computer-based Predictions of Long Allograft Survival

NCT ID: NCT04918199

Last Updated: 2023-03-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The clinical decision-making after kidney transplantation is mainly driven by patient individual assessment. However, this task remains difficult and uncertain due to the integration of complex and numerous parameters. We aim to evaluate and compare the ability of transplant physicians to predict long term allograft survival compared with a computer-based survival prediction algorithm (iBox system).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

400 kidney transplant recipients among the cohort of 4,000 patients from the Paris Transplant Group prospective kidney transplant cohort (NCT03474003) were randomly selected. We generated an anonymized electronic health record for each included patient including a total of 60 classical kidney transplant prognostic parameters comprising baseline transplant and recipient characteristics, together with post-transplant parameters including allograft function, proteinuria, histology, diagnoses, and immunological profile collected during the first-year post-transplant. The time of risk evaluation for the human and the iBox system were at 1-year post transplant and the death censored allograft survival predictions made at 7 years after risk assessment. We enrolled transplant physicians at various stages of their careers (residents, fellows and seniors) to assign death censored graft survival probabilities at 7 years post risk assessment. The physicians were blinded to the actual patient outcome (allograft failure) and the iBox predictions. The physicians-based predictions will then be compared with the iBox system, a validated computer-based kidney survival prediction system.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Kidney Transplant Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Paris Transplant Group cohort

400 (10%) of the patients were randomly selected from 4,000 consecutive patients over 18 years of age prospectively enrolled at the time of kidney transplantation from a living or deceased donor at Necker Hospital, Saint-Louis Hospital, Foch Hospital, and Toulouse Hospital between January 1, 2005, and January 1, 2014, in France.

Computer based assessment (iBox)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Individual allograft survival probabilities of death censored allograft survival seven years after the time of risk evaluation, computed using the iBox (NCT03474003), a qualified prognostication system designed to predict long term allograft survival up to seven years after evaluation.

Physician assessement

Intervention Type OTHER

Based on anonymized electronic health records, physicians have to determine a percentage of death censored allograft survival seven years after the time of risk evaluation,

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computer based assessment (iBox)

Individual allograft survival probabilities of death censored allograft survival seven years after the time of risk evaluation, computed using the iBox (NCT03474003), a qualified prognostication system designed to predict long term allograft survival up to seven years after evaluation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Physician assessement

Based on anonymized electronic health records, physicians have to determine a percentage of death censored allograft survival seven years after the time of risk evaluation,

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* transplant evaluation available at one year post-transplant

Exclusion Criteria

* no
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Paris Translational Centre for Organ Transplantation

Paris, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Loupy A, Aubert O, Orandi BJ, Naesens M, Bouatou Y, Raynaud M, Divard G, Jackson AM, Viglietti D, Giral M, Kamar N, Thaunat O, Morelon E, Delahousse M, Kuypers D, Hertig A, Rondeau E, Bailly E, Eskandary F, Bohmig G, Gupta G, Glotz D, Legendre C, Montgomery RA, Stegall MD, Empana JP, Jouven X, Segev DL, Lefaucheur C. Prediction system for risk of allograft loss in patients receiving kidney transplants: international derivation and validation study. BMJ. 2019 Sep 17;366:l4923. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4923.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31530561 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

iBoxvsHuman

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Predicting Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients
NCT06531967 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION