Exercise Booster Sessions in People With Multiple Sclerosis

NCT ID: NCT04913012

Last Updated: 2024-12-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-01

Study Completion Date

2024-10-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study wants to investigate whether exercise booster sessions applied in the follow-up period after an exercise intervention can increase the sustainability of exercise induced effects in persons with multiple sclerosis.

The study will be a randomized, multi-site, controlled trial. Participants will from the beginning be allocated to either aerobic training group, resistance training group or control group. After a 12 week exercise intervention, the exercise groups will be additionally randomized to receive either exercise booster sessions + standard care or just standard care in the 40 week follow up period.

It is hypothesized that exercise booster sessions can increase the sustainability of exercise induced effects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

MS is a chronic, autoimmune, and inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, exemplified through marked demyelination and axonal loss. As a result, symptoms such as fatigue, numbness, weakness, depression, walking difficulties and spasticity frequently appear.

Although there is no cure for MS, several disease-modifying therapies are available. These can potentially slow the progression of disabilities and reduce the overall disease burden. This is of great interest from both an individual perspective, where increased disability is associated with a lowered health-related quality of life, and from a societal perspective, where increased disability is associated with larger costs.

Over the past decades exercise has been shown to be safe, tolerable and beneficial in persons with MS (PwMS). Hence, it is known to be an effective way of treating symptoms such as fatigue7, muscle weakness, walking impairments and depression. As with other chronic diseases, exercise for PwMS has been proposed as "medicine". However, in order to benefit from the positive effects of any kind of treatment (i.e. most medical drugs or exercise) one has to adhere to the prescriptions of the treatment (i.e. dose and timing). Despite all the potential benefits of exercise therapy for PwMS, one of the major challenges relate to long-term maintenance of exercise efforts.

An emerging concept that may hold the potential to increase the sustainability of exercise therapy is supervised "exercise booster sessions" (i.e. training sessions provided regularly throughout the follow-up period, to sustain effects of the preceding exercise intervention). These can be placed regularly during the follow-up period, where patients attend a number of supervised high-intensity exercise sessions, hereby trying to boost the effects of the preceding exercise intervention. Furthermore, exercise booster sessions can potentially motivate the patient to keep exercising throughout the follow up period.

However, the optimal way of utilizing this concept is still not fully understood, and has not yet been tried in neurological patients.

Therefore, the main purpose of the present study is to investigate how exercise booster sessions combined with usual care performed over a period of 40 weeks affects the sustainability of effects on functional capacity induced by a 12-week exercise intervention.

It is hypothesized that participants receiving exercise booster sessions + usual care during follow up will have a better functional capacity at follow up, than the participants receiving usual care only.

The study will be a randomized, multi-site, controlled trial. Participants will from the beginning be allocated to either aerobic training group, resistance training group or control group. After a 12 week exercise intervention, the exercise groups will be additionally randomized to receive either exercise booster sessions + standard care or just standard care in the 40 week follow up period.

The 12 week exercise intervention will consist of 2-3 weekly supervised exercise sessions. The training will be planned by exercise physiologists and performed in a progressive manner. To allow handling of a large number of participants, who is also geographically spread, the exercise intervention will be locally anchored, but at the same time supervised by student employees and controlled by internet- and telephonic communication.

Participants allocated to exercise booster sessions will receive two sessions every fifth week during the follow up period.

The power calculation is based on the primary purpose of the study which is to investigate the effect of frequently applied exercise booster sessions. To set the estimated number of participants, a two-sample two-sided power calculation has been conducted. Based on previous studies, a mean difference on functional capacity between the group receiving usual care and the group receiving exercise booster sessions + usual care, regardless of exercise intervention, is expected to be 6% with a standard deviation (SD) of ±10%.

The level of significance was set as 5% and a statistical power of 80%. According to the power calculation each group shall contain 60 participants (expected drop-out rate of 30 % is included).

The results of these studies can have great clinical implications in many ways. If we find that by adding exercise booster sessions in a follow up period, one can maintain, or maybe even improve, functional capacity over a long period, this would be a novel finding making ground for new rehabilitation opportunities

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Exercise Rehabilitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aerobic training booster group

Will receive 12 weeks of aerobic training followed by booster sessions + standard care in the 40 follow up period

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Systematic aerobic training

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Two-three weekly supervised aerobic exercise sessions for 12 weeks. The training will be planned by exercise physiologists, and performed in a progressive manner.

Aerobic training booster sessions

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Supervised aerobic training booster sessions delivered in the follow up period (two sessions every fifth week).

Aerobic training control group

Will receive 12 weeks of aerobic training followed by standard care in the 40 follow up period

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Systematic aerobic training

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Two-three weekly supervised aerobic exercise sessions for 12 weeks. The training will be planned by exercise physiologists, and performed in a progressive manner.

Resistance training booster group

Will receive 12 weeks of resistance training training followed by booster sessions + standard care in the 40 follow up period

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Systematic resistance training

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Two-three weekly supervised resistance exercise sessions for 12 weeks. The training will be planned by exercise physiologists, and performed in a progressive manner.

Resistance training booster sessions

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Supervised resistance training booster sessions in the follow up period (two sessions every fifth week).

Resistance training control group

Will receive 12 weeks of resistance training followed by standard care in the 40 follow up period

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Systematic resistance training

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Two-three weekly supervised resistance exercise sessions for 12 weeks. The training will be planned by exercise physiologists, and performed in a progressive manner.

Control group

Will receive standard care throughout the study

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Systematic aerobic training

Two-three weekly supervised aerobic exercise sessions for 12 weeks. The training will be planned by exercise physiologists, and performed in a progressive manner.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Systematic resistance training

Two-three weekly supervised resistance exercise sessions for 12 weeks. The training will be planned by exercise physiologists, and performed in a progressive manner.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Aerobic training booster sessions

Supervised aerobic training booster sessions delivered in the follow up period (two sessions every fifth week).

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Resistance training booster sessions

Supervised resistance training booster sessions in the follow up period (two sessions every fifth week).

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A definite diagnosis of MS, according to the McDonald criteria
* Walking \<650m on 6MWT.
* Exercising ≤ two sessions per week of moderate-to-high intensity during the past six months.

Exclusion Criteria

* Comprise comorbidities (cardiovascular-, respiratory-, orthopedic- or other neurological diseases.)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oxford Brookes University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Laurits Taul-Madsen, MSc.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Aarhus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aarhus University

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2008 Oct 25;372(9648):1502-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61620-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18970977 (View on PubMed)

Calabresi PA. Diagnosis and management of multiple sclerosis. Am Fam Physician. 2004 Nov 15;70(10):1935-44.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15571060 (View on PubMed)

Pilutti LA, Platta ME, Motl RW, Latimer-Cheung AE. The safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. J Neurol Sci. 2014 Aug 15;343(1-2):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.05.016. Epub 2014 May 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24880538 (View on PubMed)

Latimer-Cheung AE, Pilutti LA, Hicks AL, Martin Ginis KA, Fenuta AM, MacKibbon KA, Motl RW. Effects of exercise training on fitness, mobility, fatigue, and health-related quality of life among adults with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review to inform guideline development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1800-1828.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.020. Epub 2013 May 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23669008 (View on PubMed)

Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine - evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25 Suppl 3:1-72. doi: 10.1111/sms.12581.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26606383 (View on PubMed)

Heesen C, Bruce J, Gearing R, Moss-Morris R, Weinmann J, Hamalainen P, Motl R, Dalgas U, Kos D, Visioli F, Feys P, Solari A, Finlayson M, Eliasson L, Matthews V, Bogossian A, Liethmann K, Kopke S, Bissell P. Adherence to behavioural interventions in multiple sclerosis: Follow-up meeting report (AD@MS-2). Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2015 May 12;1:2055217315585333. doi: 10.1177/2055217315585333. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28607693 (View on PubMed)

Dalgas U, Stenager E, Jakobsen J, Petersen T, Hansen HJ, Knudsen C, Overgaard K, Ingemann-Hansen T. Resistance training improves muscle strength and functional capacity in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2009 Nov 3;73(18):1478-84. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bf98b4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19884575 (View on PubMed)

Collett J, Dawes H, Meaney A, Sackley C, Barker K, Wade D, Izardi H, Bateman J, Duda J, Buckingham E. Exercise for multiple sclerosis: a single-blind randomized trial comparing three exercise intensities. Mult Scler. 2011 May;17(5):594-603. doi: 10.1177/1352458510391836. Epub 2011 Jan 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21247971 (View on PubMed)

Kjolhede T, Vissing K, de Place L, Pedersen BG, Ringgaard S, Stenager E, Petersen T, Dalgas U. Neuromuscular adaptations to long-term progressive resistance training translates to improved functional capacity for people with multiple sclerosis and is maintained at follow-up. Mult Scler. 2015 Apr;21(5):599-611. doi: 10.1177/1352458514549402. Epub 2014 Sep 25.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25257612 (View on PubMed)

Taul-Madsen L, Hvid LG, Riis H, Brolos MK, Lundbye-Jensen J, Dalgas U. A head-to-head comparison of the effects of aerobic versus resistance training on physical capacity and physical function in people with multiple sclerosis: Results from the MSBOOST trial. Mult Scler. 2025 Feb;31(2):174-183. doi: 10.1177/13524585241305496. Epub 2024 Dec 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39891566 (View on PubMed)

Taul-Madsen L, Hvid LG, Sellebjerg F, Christensen JR, Ratzer R, Sejbaek T, Svendsen KB, Papp V, Hojsgaard Chow H, Lundbye-Jensen J, Dawes H, Dalgas U. Study protocol: effects of exercise booster sessions on preservation of exercise-induced adaptations in persons with multiple sclerosis, a multicentre randomised controlled trial-the MS BOOSTER trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):e085241. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085241.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39153792 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Laurits_Madsen_PhD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id