Trial Outcomes & Findings for Biomechanical Reconstruction of Three Different Hip Stem Designs in Hip Dysplasia Using a 3D CT-based Planning Software (NCT NCT04904640)
NCT ID: NCT04904640
Last Updated: 2021-09-09
Results Overview
Percentage of hips correctly reconstructed using CLS stem: the correctly reconstructed hip should have combined anteversion between 25° and 50°, global offset not inferior to 12% of the native offset, leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm, sagittal and coronal tilt not superior to +/-5°, canal filling not inferior to 80% (all the 5 parameters should be present at the same time). Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 the worst
COMPLETED
150 participants
Day 0
2021-09-09
Participant Flow
Random selection of pre-operative Ct including native dysplastic hips
All the 150 patients enrolled in the study underwent a preoperative planning with a particular software, and each hip (200) was studied with three different stem design, so each of them results enrolled in each arm group which represents a different kind of hip stem.
Unit of analysis: Hips
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Simulated Hips
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.The Three stems are: CLS Zimmer, Wagner Cone Zimmer, Aptafix Adler
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
150 200
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
150 200
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
All the 150 patients enrolled in the study underwent a preoperative planning with a particular software, and each hip (200) was studied with three different stem design, so each of them results enrolled in each arm group which represents a different kind of hip stem.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Simulated Hips
n=200 Hips
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning. The three stems are: CLS Zimmer (single wedge, tapered stem), Wagner Cone Zimmer (tapered stem), Aptafix Adler (anatomical stem)
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
50.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
115 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
150 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
150 hips
n=5 Participants • All the 150 patients enrolled in the study underwent a preoperative planning with a particular software, and each hip (200) was studied with three different stem design, so each of them results enrolled in each arm group which represents a different kind of hip stem.
|
|
height
|
159.8 centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
weight
|
66.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
25.8 kg/m²
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0Percentage of hips correctly reconstructed using CLS stem: the correctly reconstructed hip should have combined anteversion between 25° and 50°, global offset not inferior to 12% of the native offset, leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm, sagittal and coronal tilt not superior to +/-5°, canal filling not inferior to 80% (all the 5 parameters should be present at the same time). Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 the worst
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CLS Stem
n=200 Hips
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|---|---|
|
Correct Reconstruction CLS
|
138 Hips
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0Percentage of hips correctly reconstructed using CLS stem: the correctly reconstructed hip should have combined anteversion between 25° and 50°, global offset not inferior to 12% of the native offset, leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm, sagittal and coronal tilt not superior to +/-5°, canal filling not inferior to 80% (all the 5 parameters should be present at the same time). Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 the worst
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CLS Stem
n=200 Hips
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|---|---|
|
Correct Reconstruction Wagner Cone
|
174 Hips
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0Percentage of hips correctly reconstructed using CLS stem: the correctly reconstructed hip should have combined anteversion between 25° and 50°, global offset not inferior to 12% of the native offset, leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm, sagittal and coronal tilt not superior to +/-5°, canal filling not inferior to 80% (all the 5 parameters should be present at the same time). Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 the worst
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CLS Stem
n=200 Hips
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|---|---|
|
Correct Reconstruction Aptafix
|
88 Hips
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0Percentage of hips with adequate combined anteversion according to Dorr (25-50°) and Widmer (\<37°) using CLS stems. Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CLS Stem
n=200 Hips
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|---|---|
|
Combined Anteversion CLS
|
153 Hips
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0Percentage of hips with adequate combined anteversion according to Dorr (25-50°) and Widmer (\<37°) using CLS stems. Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CLS Stem
n=200 Hips
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|---|---|
|
Combined Anteversion Wagner Cone
|
197 Hips
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0Percentage of hips with adequate combined anteversion according to Dorr (25-50°) and Widmer (\<37°) using CLS stems. Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CLS Stem
n=200 Hips
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|---|---|
|
Combined Anteversion Aptafix
|
121 Hips
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0Percentage of hips with acetabular+femoral offset not inferior to 12% of the native value using CLS stems. Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CLS Stem
n=200 Hips
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|---|---|
|
Offset CLS
|
192 Hips
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0Percentage of hips with acetabular+femoral offset not inferior to 12% of the native value using CLS stems. Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CLS Stem
n=200 Hips
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|---|---|
|
Offset Wagner Cone
|
186 Hips
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0Percentage of hips with acetabular+femoral offset not inferior to 12% of the native value using CLS stems. Minimum-maximum values (as percentage %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CLS Stem
n=200 Hips
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|---|---|
|
Offset Aptafix
|
164 Hips
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0Percentage of hips with leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm using CLS stems. Minimum-maximum values (as percentages %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CLS Stem
n=200 Hips
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|---|---|
|
Leg Lengthening CLS
|
188 Hips
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0Percentage of hips with leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm using CLS stems. Minimum-maximum values (as percentages %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CLS Stem
n=200 Hips
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|---|---|
|
Leg Lengthening Wagner Cone
|
194 Hips
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0Percentage of hips with leg lengthening not superior to 3 cm using CLS stems. Minimum-maximum values (as percentages %): 0-100. 100 is the best result, 0 is the worst
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CLS Stem
n=200 Hips
CLS Zimmer stem implantation (single wedge, tapered stem) using the 3D CT based software for surgical pre-operative planning
Hip stem: In every hip (with appropriate CT scan), 3 different stem designs will be positioned using a 3D Ct based software for surgical pre-operative planning.
|
|---|---|
|
Leg Lengthening Aptafix
|
183 Hips
|
Adverse Events
CLS Stem
Wagner Cone Stem
Aptafix Stem
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Francesco Castagnini, MD
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place