Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of CAZ-AVI in the Treatment of Infections Due to Carbapenem-resistant G- Pathogens in Chinese Adults (NCT NCT04882085)
NCT ID: NCT04882085
Last Updated: 2024-10-21
Results Overview
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e, complicated intra-abdominal infection \[cIAI\], complicated urinary-tract infection \[cUTI\], hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia \[HAP/VAP\] or bloodstream infection \[BSI\]) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
60 participants
At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)
2024-10-21
Participant Flow
A total of 64 participants were screened of which 3 participants failed screening and 1 participant was not randomized in the study. A total of 60 participants were enrolled and randomized in the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) 2.5 grams (g) (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered intravenously (IV) as 2-hour infusion every 8 hours (q8h) for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received best available treatment (BAT) based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
31
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
|
30
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
24
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) 2.5 grams (g) (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered intravenously (IV) as 2-hour infusion every 8 hours (q8h) for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received best available treatment (BAT) based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
6
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized not treated
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=30 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=29 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
Total
n=59 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
18-44 years
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=59 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
45-64 years
|
8 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=59 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Greater than equal to (>=) 65 years
|
21 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=59 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=59 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
22 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=29 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=59 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)Population: mMITT analysis set (subset of ITT analysis set) included all participants who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens (monomicrobial infections due to any Acinetobacter species) were excluded from mMITT analysis set.
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e, complicated intra-abdominal infection \[cIAI\], complicated urinary-tract infection \[cUTI\], hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia \[HAP/VAP\] or bloodstream infection \[BSI\]) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=27 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=27 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at Test of Cure (TOC) Visit - Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set
|
59.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 40.6 to 76.1
|
25.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.4 to 44.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)Population: ME analysis set was evaluated.
Clinical cure: improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for index infection (i.e. cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since initial procedure. 95% CI based on Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set (sub-set of mMITT): participants who received 3 days of study intervention, or received study intervention for \>=48 hours with \>= 80% compliance, or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms genetically confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at end of treatment (EOT) or TOC visits, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=14 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=19 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at TOC Visit - Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set
|
78.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 53.1 to 93.6
|
26.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.8 to 48.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)Population: mMITT analysis set (subset of ITT analysis set) included all participants who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens (monomicrobial infections due to any Acinetobacter species) were excluded from the mMITT analysis set.
Clinical cure was defined as improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for the index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since the initial procedure. The clinical response was assessed by the independent adjudication committee. 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=27 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=27 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit -mMITT Analysis Set
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 47.9 to 82.1
|
29.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.1 to 48.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At EOT visit (up to 24 hours after the last infusion on Day 14)Population: ME analysis set was evaluated.
Clinical cure: improvement in baseline signs and symptoms such that no further antimicrobial treatment was required for index infection (i.e., cIAI, cUTI, HAP/VAP or BSI) after study treatment. Also, for cIAI participants, no unplanned drainage or surgical intervention was necessary since initial procedure. 95% CI based on Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set (sub-set of mMITT): participants who received 3 days of study intervention, or received study intervention for \>=48 hours with \>= 80% compliance, or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms genetically confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT or TOC visits, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=14 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=19 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Cure at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set
|
78.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 53.1 to 93.6
|
31.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.4 to 53.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)Population: mMITT analysis set (subset of ITT analysis set) included all participants who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens (monomicrobial infections due to any Acinetobacter species) were excluded from the mMITT analysis set.
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 colony forming units per milliliter \[CFU/mL\] for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/ clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=27 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=27 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
|
59.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 40.6 to 76.1
|
25.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.4 to 44.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)Population: ME analysis set was evaluated.
Favorable microbiological response=eradication: absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from appropriately obtained specimen at site of infection or presumed eradication: repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in participant who had clinical cure (specific to cIAI,HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set: participants received 3 days of study intervention,or received study intervention for \>= 48 hours with \>=80% compliance or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT/TOC, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=14 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=19 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - ME Analysis Set
|
71.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 45.5 to 89.5
|
31.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.4 to 53.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)Population: mMITT analysis set (subset of ITT analysis set) included all participants who met minimum disease requirements and received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens (monomicrobial infections due to any Acinetobacter species) were excluded from the mMITT analysis set.
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=27 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=27 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
|
81.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 64.1 to 92.6
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.9 to 52.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)Population: ME analysis set was evaluated.
Favorable microbiological response=eradication: absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from appropriately obtained specimen at site of infection or presumed eradication: repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in participant who had clinical cure (specific to cIAI,HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method. ME analysis set: participants received 3 days of study intervention,or received study intervention for \>= 48 hours with \>=80% compliance or for \<48 hours before discontinuation due to adverse event, no concomitant antibiotics against baseline carbapenem-resistant gram negative pathogens between first dose and TOC (excluding participants with failed study therapy requiring additional antibiotics), had baseline organisms confirmed by central microbiological testing, no indeterminate clinical outcome at EOT/TOC, no important protocol deviations that affect assessment of efficacy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=14 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=19 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Participant Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - ME Analysis Set
|
78.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 53.1 to 93.6
|
42.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 22.3 to 64.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At TOC visit (From Day 21 up to Day 24)Population: mMITT analysis set: all participants who met minimum disease requirements, received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens were excluded. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. 'Number Analyzed' =number of participants evaluable for the specified rows.
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=27 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=27 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Escherichia Coli
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.7 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Enterococcus Faecium
|
—
|
0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 85.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
63.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 40.9 to 81.8
|
30.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.8 to 50.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
|
37.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.9 to 70.5
|
0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 44.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Staphylococcus Aureus
|
0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 85.3
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Staphylococcus Capitis Subspecies
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.7 to 100.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At EOT visit (Up to 24 hours after last infusion on Day 14)Population: mMITT analysis set: all participants who met minimum disease requirements, received any amount of study therapy, had at least 1 carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen in an adequate initial/pre-study culture. Participants with inherently resistant pathogens were excluded. All participants reported under 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. 'Number Analyzed' =number of participants evaluable for the specified rows.
Favorable microbiological response was defined as eradication or presumed eradication. Eradication was defined as absence (or urine quantification \<10\^3 CFU/mL for cUTI participants) of causative pathogen from an appropriately obtained specimen at the site of infection. Presumed eradication was defined as repeat culture of specimens were not performed/clinically indicated in a participant who had a clinical response of cure (specific to cIAI and HAP/VAP participants). 95% CI was calculated using Jeffrey's method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=27 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=27 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Enterococcus Faecium
|
—
|
0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 85.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Escherichia Coli
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.7 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Klebsiella Pneumoniae
|
89.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 70.3 to 97.7
|
39.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.4 to 59.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
|
75.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 40.8 to 94.4
|
0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 44.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Staphylococcus Aureus
|
0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 85.3
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Per-Pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT Visit - mMITT Analysis Set
Staphylococcus Capitis Subspecies
|
100.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.7 to 100.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to Day 28Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least one dose of study intervention.
Percentage of participants who died due to any cause up to Day 28 was reported in this outcome measure. The 95% CI was calculated using the Jeffrey's method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=30 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=29 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause Until Day 28
|
13.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.7 to 28.7
|
13.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.8 to 29.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who took any study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was any AE that started after the study intervention start date and time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=30 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=29 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
|
24 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of study treatment on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (Up to 46 days)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who took any study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received.
Number of participants who discontinued the study due to adverse events were reported in this outcome measure. Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs included all participants with an AE record indicating that the AE caused permanent discontinuation from the study. Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs included participants with an AE record indicating that action taken with study treatment was drug withdrawn but AE did not cause the participant to be discontinued from study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=30 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=29 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events
Discontinuations from study due to TEAEs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events
Permanent discontinuations from any study intervention due to TEAEs
|
1 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who took any study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Potentially clinically significant hematology parameters included Hemoglobin (gram/deciliter), Hematocrit (%), Erythrocytes (10\^12/Liter \[L\]): value \< 0.8\*lower limit of normal (LLN) and change (Chg) \> 20% decrease, value \> 1.3\*upper limit of normal (ULN) and Chg \> 30% increase. Platelets (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 50% decrease, Value \> 1.5\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Leukocytes (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 60% decrease, Value \> 1.6\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Lymphocytes (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.25\*LLN and Chg \> 75% decrease, Value \> 1.5\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Neutrophils (10\^9/L): Value \< 0.65\*LLN and Chg \> 75% decrease, Value \> 1.6\*ULN and Chg \> 100% increase. Basophils (10\^9/L), Eosinophils (10\^9/L), Monocytes (10\^9/L): Value \> 4.0\*ULN and Chg \> 300% increase. Number of participants with potentially clinically significant values for any hematology parameters were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=29 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=28 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Hematology Values
|
7 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment (Day 1) until TOC (Up to Day 24)Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who took any study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the product they actually received. Here, 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Potentially clinically significant criteria included Bilirubin(mg/dL): \>2.0\*ULN and Chg \>150% increase (inc).Aspartate Aminotransferase,Alanine Aminotransferase(Units/Liter\[U/L\]):\>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Alkaline Phosphatase(U/L):\<0.5\*LLN and Chg \>80% decrease (dec),\> 2.0\*ULN and Chg \>100% inc.Protein,Albumin(g/dL):\<0.5\*LLN and Chg \>50% dec,\>1.5\*ULN and Chg \>50% inc.Blood Urea Nitrogen(mg/dL):\<0.2\*LLN and Chg \>100% dec, \>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Creatinine(mg/dL):\>2.0\*ULN and Chg \>100% inc.Sodium(milliequivalent\[mEq\]/L):\<0.85\*LLN and Chg \>10% dec, \>1.1\*ULN and Chg \>10% inc.Potassium,Chloride(mEq/L):\<0.8\*LLN and Chg \>20% dec, \>1.2\*ULN and Chg \>20% inc.Calcium(mg/dL):\<0.7\*LLN and Chg \>30% dec,\> 1.3\*ULN and Chg \>30% inc.Bicarbonate(mEq/L):\<0.7\*LLN and Chg \>40% dec, \>1.3\*ULN and Chg \>40% inc.Glucose(mg/dL):\<0.6\*LLN and Chg \>40% dec, \>3.0\*ULN and Chg \>200% inc.Number of participants with potentially clinically significant values for any clinical chemistry parameters were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=30 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=28 Participants
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Post-baseline Clinical Chemistry Values
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
Best Available Treatment
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=30 participants at risk
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=29 participants at risk
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
3.3%
1/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Acute hepatic failure
|
3.3%
1/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
3.3%
1/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
3.3%
1/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection bacterial
|
3.3%
1/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemothorax
|
3.3%
1/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
10.3%
3/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Circulatory collapse
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Shock
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ceftazidime-Avibactam
n=30 participants at risk
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received CAZ-AVI 2.5 g (2 g ceftazidime + 0.5 g avibactam) administered IV as 2-hour infusion q8h for 14 days.
|
Best Available Treatment
n=29 participants at risk
Participants with confirmed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens infection received BAT based on investigative site practice and local epidemiology and guideline for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Coagulopathy
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
10.3%
3/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
10.3%
3/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
10.3%
3/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
3.3%
1/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
20.7%
6/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
10.3%
3/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
10.0%
3/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Investigations
Acid base balance abnormal
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium decreased
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
3.3%
1/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
10.0%
3/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoproteinaemia
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Malnutrition
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
3.4%
1/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic acidosis
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic alkalosis
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
3.3%
1/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
0.00%
0/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory alkalosis
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
|
6.7%
2/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
0.00%
0/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
3.3%
1/30 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
6.9%
2/29 • From start of study intervention on Day 1 up to 32 days after the last dose of study intervention (up to 46 days)
Same event may appear as both non-SAE and SAE but what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and non-serious in other, or participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event. All-cause mortality was assessed in ITT analysis set and SAEs and non-SAEs were assessed in safety population.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publication until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER