STIMULUS MDS-US : Sabatolimab Added to HMA in Higher Risk MDS
NCT ID: NCT04878432
Last Updated: 2025-10-16
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
39 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-17
2024-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Efficacy and Safety of MBG453 in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects With Intermediate, High or Very High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) as Per IPSS-R, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia-2 (CMML-2)
NCT04266301
Sabatolimab as a Treatment for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Presence of Measurable Residual Disease After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.
NCT04623216
Phase Ib Study of Select Drug Combinations in Patients With Lower Risk MDS
NCT04810611
MBG453 in Lower Risk MDS
NCT04823624
Magrolimab + Azacitidine Versus Azacitidine + Placebo in Untreated Participants With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
NCT04313881
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There were 4 separate periods of this study:
1. Screening period (signing of written informed consent through day of enrollment),
2. Core phase for up to 12 months,
3. Extension phase for efficacy and/or survival status (up to 12 months after the core phase),
4. Post-treatment safety follow-up period monitoring for AEs for 30 days following the last dose of azacitidine or decitabine or INQOVI (oral decitabine), or 150 days following the last dose of sabatolimab, whichever was later.
During the conduct of the study there were 2 updates to the Novartis development strategy for sabatolimab. Based on the results from the Phase II STIMULUS MDS-1 study, recruitment was halted for CMBG453B1US01 (STIMULUS MDS-US) on 30-Sep-2022. Novartis confirmed the decision to halt recruitment was not based on any safety findings or safety concerns. Patients who were on study treatment or in follow-up were continued as per the protocol. Furthermore, on 11-Jan-2024, all sabatolimab investigators were notified by Novartis that, based on decision taken in Dec-2023, that the sabatolimab development program (which included study CMBG453B1US01) would be terminated. After the decision was made to discontinue the sabatolimab development program, participants already enrolled in the CMBG453B1US01 study were prepared for closure; these close out activities took approximately 9 months. The actual last patient last visit date was 1 Sep 2024.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MBG453 (sabatolimab) + HMA
MBG453 (sabatolimab) + HMA of investigator's choice (IV Decitabine or Azacitidine /SC Azacitidine /Oral Decitabine (cedazuridine combination (INQOVI)))
MBG453
Solution for intravenous infusion
Azacitidine
Solution for subcutaneous injection or intravenous administration
Decitabine
Solution for intravenous administration
INQOVI (oral decitabine)
Tablet for oral administration
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MBG453
Solution for intravenous infusion
Azacitidine
Solution for subcutaneous injection or intravenous administration
Decitabine
Solution for intravenous administration
INQOVI (oral decitabine)
Tablet for oral administration
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age ≥ 18 years at the date of signing the informed consent form (ICF).
3. Morphologically confirmed diagnosis of a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) primary or secondary based on 2016 WHO classification by Investigator assessment with one of the following prognostic risk categories, based on the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R).. Note: MDS diagnosis history were recorded in the CRF:
* Very high (\> 6 points)
* High (\> 4.5 to ≤ 6 points)
* Intermediate (\> 3 to ≤ 4.5 points)
4. Not suitable at the time of Screening for immediate myeloablative/chemotherapy or HSCT based on Investigator assessment of age, comorbidities, local guidelines, institutional practice (any or all of these).
5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2.
6. AST and ALT ≤ 3 × upper limit of normal (ULN).
7. Total bilirubin ≤ 2 × ULN (except in the setting of isolated Gilbert syndrome).
8. Estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (estimation based on modification of diet in renal disease formula, by local laboratory).
9. Patient was able to communicate with the Investigator and had the ability to comply with the requirements of the study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Previous treatment for intermediate, high or very high risk MDS (based on IPSS-R) with chemotherapy or other antineoplastic agents including lenalidomide and hypomethylating agent (HMAs) such as decitabine or INQOVI (oral decitabine) or azacitidine (patients who had up to 1 cycle of HMAs were included). However, previous treatment with hydroxyurea was permitted.
3. Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) including acute promyelocytic leukemia and extra-medullary acute myeloid leukemia based on WHO 2016 classification.
4. Diagnosis of Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or primary or secondary myelofibrosis based on 2016 WHO classification.
5. History of organ transplant or allogenic HSCT.
6. Patients with prior malignancy, except:
1. Patients with history of lower risk Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) treated by supportive care (e.g., growth factors, transforming growth factor- beta agents) or untreated were eligible.
2. Patients with history of lower risk MDS who were treated adequately with lenalidomide and then failed were eligible.
3. Patients with history of adequately treated malignancy for which no anticancer systemic therapy (namely chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery) was ongoing or required during the course of the study. Patients who were receiving adjuvant therapy such as hormone therapy were eligible.
7. Patients with MDS based on 2016 WHO classification with revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) ≤ 3.
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Arizona Oncology Associates
Tucson, Arizona, United States
SCRI-Colorado Blood Cancer Institute
Denver, Colorado, United States
Yale University School Of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Advent Health Orlando
Orlando, Florida, United States
Uni of Massachusetts Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
University Of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Tisch Hospital NYU Langone
New York, New York, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Duke Cancer Institute
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University Hospitals Of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Uni Of TX MD Anderson Cancer Cntr
Houston, Texas, United States
Texas Oncology San Antonio USO
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on www.novctrd.com
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CMBG453B1US01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.