Social Media-Delivered Patient Education in Enhancing Type 2 Diabetics Self-Management and Attitudes During the COVID-19 Pandemic

NCT ID: NCT04876274

Last Updated: 2022-03-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

181 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-14

Study Completion Date

2020-12-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current study was to develop a software "Line@" based health education program, providing video-based health information and communication between diabetes patients and health-care professionals. This study also evaluated its effectiveness on improving glycemic control, attitude towards diabetes, knowledge about diabetes and self-care for type 2 diabetes patients in Taiwan.

The followings were the hypotheses of the study:

1. Compared to the control group, intervention group receiving "Line" based video education has a greater improvement on glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C).
2. Compared to the control group, intervention group receiving "Line" based video education has a greater positive effect on attitude towards diabetes.
3. Compared to the control group, intervention group receiving "Line" based video education has a better understanding on diabetic knowledge.
4. Compared to the control group, intervention group receiving "Line" based video education has a greater positive effect on self-care activity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study was conducted in the Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinic in Taipei Medical University Wang-Fang Hospital. Patients were referred from physicians if they met the inclusion criteria and consent to join. Written consent and questionnaires were then provided to the participants after researcher had clearly explained the study purpose.

Based on the seven key points in managing diabetes developed by the association of diabetes care and education specialist (ADCES), including healthy coping, healthy eating, being active, monitoring, taking medication, problem solving and reducing risks, the research team had developed 51 diabetes related health educational videos (available at website of School of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University http://pharmschool.tmu.edu.tw/activity/index.php?type=20). Each video lasted for about 2-3 minutes. According to the content of the videos, it was categorized into 5 domains, including understanding diabetes, daily care, nutrition care, diabetes drug and diabetes knowledge related quizzes.

Patients in intervention group could attend the video through the line platform. Researcher would also send 2-3 videos per week with care massage every 2 weeks to the patients. The general schedule of video was shown in table x. According to various condition, researcher developed specific video schedule for each patients. For example, patient who was prescribed with A drug, we would only send the video regarding A drug to this patient but not all of the video regarding drugs. Schedule for the part of understanding diabetes, daily care, nutrition care and quizzes was the same among all participants. Due to the quizzes that were put in week 3, 6, 9 and 12, videos related to general knowledge about diabetes would be send to patients first to make sure all the quizzes related content had already taught to patients before the quizzes. Moreover, patients could communicate with the research team and ask questions through the platform, researcher would provide answers verified by pharmacists or physicians in one or two days after.

The sample size of this study was estimated using G-power (version 3.1). Assuming a power of 80% with two-sided alpha level for detecting the difference between the intervention group and the control group, at least 64 patients were needed for each group. Considering 20% dropout rate, the study was designed to have at least 80 patients for each group, 160 patients in total.

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio according to the random allocation sequence generated prior to the study. Patients with odd number were allocated into control group while even numbers were allocated into intervention group. The trial was non-blinded because of its feasibility.

Researcher would not provide any inductive explanation to the patient during filling the questionnaire. If patient had questions about the items, a detailed explanation and health education were provided only after finishing the post-test. The returned questionnaires were collected by the researcher and kept in the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University for three years.

All the data were analyzed using SPSS (SPSS Inc. Released 2009. Predictive Analytics Suite Workstation (PASW) Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.). A two-tailed p value of 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant in the analysis. For personal characteristics, descriptive analysis was performed. According to the characteristic of data, Chi-square test and t-test was used for detecting the differences between groups. a Wilcoxon signed rank test or paired t-tests was performed for the differences in A1C and the scores between pre and post-test about knowledge, self-care activity and attitude towards diabetes. A Mann-Whitney test or unpaired t-tests was performed for the mean differences between control and intervention group. Logistics regression was performed for the correlation between variables.

Patients who had finished both pre- and post-assessment would be included for analysis, those without post-test would be excluded. Missing values were processed by multiple imputation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

Patients in the intervention group received Taipei Medical University (TMU) line-oriented video education and care in addition to usual care

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TMU-LOVE

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients in intervention group could attend diabetes-related health educational video through the TMU-LOVE platform. Researcher would also send 2-3 videos per week with care massage every 2 weeks to the patients.

Control group

Patients in the control group received usual care

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TMU-LOVE

Patients in intervention group could attend diabetes-related health educational video through the TMU-LOVE platform. Researcher would also send 2-3 videos per week with care massage every 2 weeks to the patients.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM)
* Age 20 or older
* Had at least 1 A1C data in the past 6 months
* Possessed a smart-cellphone
* A1C ≥ 6%

Exclusion Criteria

* Gestational diabetes
* Cognitive impairment
* No medication treatment but dietary control alone
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Taipei Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

LEONG CHENG MAN

Master student, School of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chen Hsiang-Yin, Pharm.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor and Associate Dean, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

School of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leong CM, Lee TI, Chien YM, Kuo LN, Kuo YF, Chen HY. Social Media-Delivered Patient Education to Enhance Self-management and Attitudes of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 23;24(3):e31449. doi: 10.2196/31449.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35319478 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TMU-LOVE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.