Apical External Root Resorption Secondary to Orthodontic Forces and Individual Radicular Stress

NCT ID: NCT04870463

Last Updated: 2025-06-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-13

Study Completion Date

2025-06-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this prospective clinical trial is to evaluate the possible superiority of a treatment compared to the gold standard of reference in Orthodontics.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Apical external root resorption is defined as the loss of dental hard tissues such as dentine, cement and alveolar bone. This is considered an irrevocable effect associated to different factors, among which dental movement during orthodontic treatment is related.

This study suggest to compare root resorption after the use of two different types of alignment and levelling arches in orthodontics. Consecutive patients randomly chosen will be analysed after going through one of the two arches sequences:

1. Gold standard group: using arches that provide the same amount of force in all sections . 3M United® nickel-titanium arches (0.012, 0.014, 0.016 x 0.016, 0.020 x 0.020, 0.018 x 0.025 y 0.019 x 0.025)
2. Intervention group: using some arches that provide individual sectional forces for each dental group (incisors, premolars and molars). 3M United® nickel-titanium 0.012 and 0.014 arches and BioForce PLUS® arches (0.016 x 0.016, 0.020 x 0.020, 0.018 x 0.025 y 0.019 x 0.025).

All patients will be treated with multi-braces fixed appliances (0.022" technique and VictoryTM brackets).

Root resorption will be compared through CBCT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) images made before the beginning of treatment (T0), after 8-9 months of the beginning of treatment (T1) and at the end of treatment (T2). Root resorption will be measured by the root volume and surface root morphology in each of the times scheduled.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Apical Root Resorption

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized clinical trial of two parallel arms, that analysed the possible superiority of one treatment compared to the gold standard of reference
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gold Standard Group

Patients treated with multi-braces fixed appliances and a conventional sequence of aligning and levelling arches (Ni-Ti arches with the same force in all sections)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Maxillary and mandibular Cone Beam Computed Tomography record

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A Cone Beam Computed Tomography image of each patient of each group at three different moments of the study (baseline/T0, 8-9 months of treatment/T1 and end of treatment/T2)

Intervention Group

Patients treated with multi-braces fixed appliances and a different sequence of aligning and levelling arches (some arches provide individual forces for each group of teeth (incisors, premolars and molars))

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Maxillary and mandibular Cone Beam Computed Tomography record

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A Cone Beam Computed Tomography image of each patient of each group at three different moments of the study (baseline/T0, 8-9 months of treatment/T1 and end of treatment/T2)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Maxillary and mandibular Cone Beam Computed Tomography record

A Cone Beam Computed Tomography image of each patient of each group at three different moments of the study (baseline/T0, 8-9 months of treatment/T1 and end of treatment/T2)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Completed permanent dentition (third molars are excluded)
2. Completed root formation
3. Need of orthodontic treatment

Exclusion Criteria

1. Tooth agenesis in the anterior region (incisors)
2. Included or ankylosed teeth in the anterior region (incisors)
3. Periodontal pocket \>3 mm in any anterior teeth (incisors)
4. Need of a combined surgical and orthodontic treatment
5. Root resorptions observed at the initial CBCT (in more than 3 teeth)
6. Delay of the treatment due to a external reason or complication during treatment
7. Systemic disease or cranio-facial malformation
8. Tooth fracture or restoration in the anterior region (incisors) at the beginning of treatment
9. Problems from roots such as lacerated root, trauma or fractures during treatment 10 Severe occlusal attrition
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alejandro Iglesias Linares

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Estrella1*

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.