Trial Outcomes & Findings for HepaSphere™ Microspheres Prospective Registry (NCT NCT04866290)

NCT ID: NCT04866290

Last Updated: 2023-04-03

Results Overview

Median overall survival of subjects treated with HepaSphere Microspheres loaded with irinotecan. Analysis will be performed when all subjects enrolled have been followed for survival for two years (24 months), are considered lost to follow up, or have died, whichever comes first

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

105 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

24 months

Results posted on

2023-04-03

Participant Flow

Study enrollment began in September 2016 and ended in May 2019.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver
This was a non-randomized, single arm, prospective study that included all enrolled study participants that met the inclusion criteria, did not meet the exclusion criteria, and provided written informed consent.
Enrolled and Completion of TACE Cycle 1
STARTED
105
Enrolled and Completion of TACE Cycle 1
COMPLETED
105
Enrolled and Completion of TACE Cycle 1
NOT COMPLETED
0
Completion of TACE Cycle 2
STARTED
105
Completion of TACE Cycle 2
COMPLETED
58
Completion of TACE Cycle 2
NOT COMPLETED
47

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver
n=105 Participants
This was a non-randomized, single arm, prospective study that included all enrolled study participants that met the inclusion criteria, did not meet the exclusion criteria, and provided written informed consent.
Age, Continuous
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 • n=105 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants
n=105 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
83 Participants
n=105 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
100 Participants
n=105 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
5 Participants
n=105 Participants
Baseline Disease Status: Tumor Location
Unilobar Liver Disease/Tumor Location
65 Participants
n=105 Participants
Baseline Disease Status: Tumor Location
Bilobar Liver Disease/ Tumor Location
40 Participants
n=105 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 months

Population: All enrolled subjects received one or more TACE Cycles and therefore were included in the calculation of the primary endpoint, Median Overall Survival.

Median overall survival of subjects treated with HepaSphere Microspheres loaded with irinotecan. Analysis will be performed when all subjects enrolled have been followed for survival for two years (24 months), are considered lost to follow up, or have died, whichever comes first

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver
n=105 Participants
This was a non-randomized, single arm, prospective study that included all enrolled study participants that met the inclusion criteria, did not meet the exclusion criteria, and provided written informed consent.
Overall Survival
19 months
Interval 14.0 to 23.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 months

Population: Only subjects with complete imaging could be analyzed. Eighty three of the subjects had imaging and were evaluated using mRECIST criteria to calculate the objective response rate (ORR).

Determined by the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (mRECIST) when all subjects enrolled have been followed for survival for 2 years (from date of 1st TACE), are considered lost to follow up, or have died, whichever comes first. Per mRECIST (target lesions assessed by MRI): Complete Response (CR), at least \>=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all viable target lesions, Partial Response (PR), at least a \>=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all viable target lesions, Stable Disease (SD), any cases that do not qualify for either partial response or progressive disease, Progressive Disease (PD), An increase of at least 20% in the sum of the diameters of or viable (enhancing) target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions recorded since started. Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. ORR is calculated as= (no. of patients with CR + the no. of patients with PR) / N. (N= No of participants analyzed)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver
n=83 Participants
This was a non-randomized, single arm, prospective study that included all enrolled study participants that met the inclusion criteria, did not meet the exclusion criteria, and provided written informed consent.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Complete Response (CR)
5 Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Partial Response (PR)
30 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 months

Population: Only subjects with complete imaging could be analyzed. Eighty three of the subjects had imaging and were evaluated using mRECIST criteria.

Per the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (mRECIST) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), at least \> =30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all viable ( enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesions, Partial Response (PR), at least a \>=30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all viable (enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesions, Stable Disease (SD), any cases that do not qualify for either partial response or progressive disease, Progressive Disease (PD), An increase of at least 20% in the sum of the diameters of or viable (enhancing) target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions recorded since started. Best Tumor Response (BTR) was assessed during the period of time between TACE Cycle 1 and the last post-TACE MRI or CT. BTR will be presented as the number of subjects within each response category and percentage of evaluated subjects.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver
n=83 Participants
This was a non-randomized, single arm, prospective study that included all enrolled study participants that met the inclusion criteria, did not meet the exclusion criteria, and provided written informed consent.
Best Tumor Response
Complete Response (CR)
5 Participants
Best Tumor Response
Partial Response (PR)
30 Participants
Best Tumor Response
Stable Disease (SD)
25 Participants
Best Tumor Response
Progressive Disease (PD)
23 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 months

Population: Only 17 subjects had data available to calculate progression free survival (definition: a lack of tumor progression in the liver as determined by mRECIST criteria).

Median liver progression-free survival will be calculated as the time (in months) between the first TACE procedure to the date on which progression of the subject's liver metastases was documented or the date of death (from any cause). Per the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (mRECIST) for target lesions and assessed by MRI, Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as an increase of at least 20% in the sum of the diameters of or viable (enhancing) target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions recorded since started.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver
n=17 Participants
This was a non-randomized, single arm, prospective study that included all enrolled study participants that met the inclusion criteria, did not meet the exclusion criteria, and provided written informed consent.
Liver Progression-free Survival
4.0 months
Interval 3.0 to
NA Explanation: The confidence interval cannot be calculated for the upper bounds of median survival because less than 50% of events (e.g. alive, death) have occurred from the low sample of 17 subjects. The upper limit of the survival curve has not reached 50% and thus, there is no estimate for the upper confidence limit on the median.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 months

Population: A total of 87 subjects had disease progression after one or more study TACE procedures, 66 with hepatic progression and 21 with extrahepatic progression.

Time to Progression (TTP) was defined as the length of time between TACE Cycle 1 and disease progression (as determined by MRI or CT imaging) of both hepatic and extrahepatic disease. The date of the first study TACE was time zero.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver
n=87 Participants
This was a non-randomized, single arm, prospective study that included all enrolled study participants that met the inclusion criteria, did not meet the exclusion criteria, and provided written informed consent.
Time to Progression
Hepatic Liver Disease
7.0 Months
Interval 6.0 to 9.0
Time to Progression
Extra Hepatic Disease
6.0 Months
Interval 3.0 to 9.0

Adverse Events

Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 97 other events
Deaths: 79 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver
n=105 participants at risk
This was a non-randomized, single arm, prospective study that included all enrolled study participants that met the inclusion criteria, did not meet the exclusion criteria, and provided written informed consent.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumor rupture
0.95%
1/105 • Number of events 1 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver
n=105 participants at risk
This was a non-randomized, single arm, prospective study that included all enrolled study participants that met the inclusion criteria, did not meet the exclusion criteria, and provided written informed consent.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
84.8%
89/105 • Number of events 180 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
26.7%
28/105 • Number of events 31 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
18.1%
19/105 • Number of events 20 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.
General disorders
Fatigue
16.2%
17/105 • Number of events 18 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.
General disorders
Pyrexia
3.8%
4/105 • Number of events 5 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.
Infections and infestations
Abscess
0.95%
1/105 • Number of events 1 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.
Infections and infestations
Liver abscess
0.95%
1/105 • Number of events 1 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
0.95%
1/105 • Number of events 1 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
11.4%
12/105 • Number of events 16 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
0.95%
1/105 • Number of events 1 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.
Investigations
Transaminases increased
9.5%
10/105 • Number of events 12 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
0.95%
1/105 • Number of events 1 • Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 1315 days.
Only treatment related adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the duration of this study. Treatment related AEs were defined as AEs that occurred on the day of or any day following a subject's first TACE procedure and determined to be treatment related by the investigator.

Additional Information

Vicky Brunk RN, Vice President, Medical Affairs, Merit Medical

Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

Phone: +1 (717) 873-3309

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: LTE60