EREctile Function Preservation for Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy (ERECT)
NCT ID: NCT04861194
Last Updated: 2021-08-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-14
2025-08-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Prostate Cancer
NCT03889119
A First Step Towards Ultra-hypofractionation for Unfavourable Intermediate and High-risk Prostate Cancer
NCT05361902
Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Decreased Radiation Dose to Erectile Tissue in Treating Patients With Stage II Prostate Cancer
NCT00084552
Dosimetry, Safety and Potential Benefit of 177Lu-PSMA-617 Prior to Prostatectomy
NCT04430192
External Beam Therapy With Theranostic Radioligand Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer (ProstACT TARGET)
NCT05146973
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: To investigate preservation of erectile function after MR-guided radiotherapy with neurovascular-sparing in patients with localized prostate cancer.
Study design: The EREctile function preservation for prostate Cancer radiation Therapy (ERECT) trial is a prospective, single-center, phase 2 trial. Patients will be treated with the MR-Linac up to 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy with neurovascular-sparing. All fractions will be delivered over the course of 2 and a half weeks.
Study population: Men with low- and intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate, clinical stage T1c-T2c, and Gleason ≤7, and iPSA \<20 µg/L (NCCN risk categories). Patients with pT1a/b tumor diagnosis after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are included, patients with "bulky" iT3 tumor diagnosis are excluded. Baseline erectile function score according to the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire of at least 17.
Intervention: All patients will receive MR-Linac treatment consisting of 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy with neurovascular sparing, Fractions will be delivered with an overall treatment time of two and a half weeks.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
Primary endpoint: the incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) three years after treatment.
Secondary endpoints: relapse-free survival, acute and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity and patient reported quality of life.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participants will receive neurovascular sparing MR guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) consisting of 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy. The number of fractions and duration of treatment is similar to conventional MRgRT consisting of 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy. No increase in toxicity is expected as the dose constraints for the organs at risk in the neurovascular sparing plan will be identical to the conventional plan (i.e. bladder, rectum, femoral head and anal sphincter). For neurovascular sparing treatment, the protocol is extended with dose constraints for newly identified organs at risk (i.e. neurovascular bundles (NVB), internal pudendal arteries (IPA), corpora cavernosa (CC) and penile bulb (PB)). Attention for these organs at risk during treatment planning may reduce erectile dysfunction for the neurovascular sparing treatment. The dose to the dorsolateral part of the prostate might be lower in the NVB sparing plan as the NVB lies in close proximity to this part of the prostate. A slight dose concession on the dorsolateral part of the prostate will only be permitted if the visible tumor on multiparametric MRI is not in vicinity of the NVB as underdosage of the dominant index lesion is undesirable for tumor control. A lower dose to the dorsolateral part of the prostate may have an impact on biochemical control for certain cases, but we do not expect that it will influence overall survival.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Neurovascular-sparing 5x7.25 Gy MRgRT
MRgRT to the prostate in 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy, additionally sparing the neurovascular bundles, internal pudendal arteries, corpora cavernosa, and penile bulb
Neurovascular-sparing
Dose reduction of the neurovascular bundles, internal pudendal arteries, corpora cavernosa, and penile bulb during 5x7.25 Gy MRgRT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neurovascular-sparing
Dose reduction of the neurovascular bundles, internal pudendal arteries, corpora cavernosa, and penile bulb during 5x7.25 Gy MRgRT
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate
* Low-risk or intermediate-risk prostate cancer according to NCCN risk categories (low risk: T1c-T2a, Gleason score ≤6, and PSA \<10 µg/L; intermediate risk: T2b-T2c or Gleason score 7 or PSA 10-20 µg/L)
* Patients with pT1a/b tumor diagnosis after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)
* Domain score of 17-25 on the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) questionnaire
* Karnofsky score of 70-100
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* High-risk prostate cancer according to NCCN risk categories (T3a or Gleason score 8-10 or PSA \>20 µg/L)
* Patients with "bulky" iT3 tumor diagnosis
* Previous pelvic irradiation or radical prostatectomy
* Clinical evidence of metastatic disease
* Patients who are unable to undergo MRI
* Patients who are incompetent to sign written informed consent
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Helena M Verkooijen
Prof.dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jochem RN van der Voort van Zyp, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UMC Utrecht
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Roy A, Green O, Brenneman R, Bosch W, Gay HA, Michalski JM, Baumann BC. Assessing Inter-Fraction Changes in The Size and Position of The Penile Bulb During Daily MR-Guided Radiation Therapy to The Prostate Bed: Do We Need to Adjust How We Plan Radiation in The Post-Radical Prostatectomy Setting to Reduce Risk of Erectile Dysfunction? Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Jun;20(3):e227-e232. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL73192.041.20
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.