Trial Outcomes & Findings for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Maintenance Treatment Patterns in China (NCT NCT04853238)
NCT ID: NCT04853238
Last Updated: 2024-12-06
Results Overview
Participants who received prescription for COPD maintenance treatment were reported for following categories; Use the maintenance treatment, Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist (LAMA), Long-Acting Beta-Agonist (LABA), LABA/LAMA, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA, Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, Single Inhaler Triple Therapy \[SITT\]), Multiple Inhaler Triple Therapy (MITT), Theophylline, MITT or SITT, N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine. The measurement at Baseline visit (Day 1) was defined as Baseline. Participants may have received more than one COPD maintenance treatment. Hence, they may have counted in more than one category, so the total may not match to Number analyzed (N).
COMPLETED
1507 participants
At Baseline (Day 1)
2024-12-06
Participant Flow
This non-interventional study aims to assess Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) maintenance treatment patterns among newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed participants with COPD presenting to clinics, either in a stable state or with acute exacerbation. No study treatment was administered in current study (NCT04853238).
A total of 1507 participants were enrolled in the study (Enrolled Population: All participants who passed screening \[met eligibility criteria\] and entered the study).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
802
|
71
|
634
|
|
Overall Study
Analysis Data Set
|
797
|
71
|
615
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
772
|
68
|
561
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
30
|
3
|
73
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
4
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
16
|
2
|
37
|
|
Overall Study
Poor adherence, unable to cooperate with investigator to complete test
|
1
|
1
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
0
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria
|
3
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Maintenance Treatment Patterns in China
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Total
n=1483 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.15 • n=5 Participants
|
68.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.40 • n=7 Participants
|
69.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.28 • n=5 Participants
|
68.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.27 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
94 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
168 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
703 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
546 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1315 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian-Chinese
|
797 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
615 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1483 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Baseline (Day 1)Population: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field.
Participants who received prescription for COPD maintenance treatment were reported for following categories; Use the maintenance treatment, Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist (LAMA), Long-Acting Beta-Agonist (LABA), LABA/LAMA, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA, Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, Single Inhaler Triple Therapy \[SITT\]), Multiple Inhaler Triple Therapy (MITT), Theophylline, MITT or SITT, N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine. The measurement at Baseline visit (Day 1) was defined as Baseline. Participants may have received more than one COPD maintenance treatment. Hence, they may have counted in more than one category, so the total may not match to Number analyzed (N).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at Baseline
Use the maintenance treatment
|
735 Participants
|
68 Participants
|
554 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at Baseline
LAMA
|
105 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at Baseline
LABA
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at Baseline
LABA/LAMA
|
164 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at Baseline
ICS/LABA
|
165 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
107 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at Baseline
Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT)
|
225 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
126 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at Baseline
MITT
|
55 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at Baseline
Theophylline
|
117 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
427 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at Baseline
MITT or SITT
|
280 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
169 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at Baseline
N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine
|
81 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
240 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At 3 monthsPopulation: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field.
Participants who received prescription for COPD maintenance treatment were reported for following categories; Use the maintenance treatment, LAMA, LABA, LABA/LAMA, ICS/LABA, Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT), MITT, Theophylline, MITT or SITT, N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine. Participants may have received more than one COPD maintenance treatment. Hence, they may have counted in more than one category, so the total may not match to Number analyzed (N).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
Use the maintenance treatment
|
685 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
433 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
LAMA
|
95 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
LABA
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
LABA/LAMA
|
138 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
ICS/LABA
|
143 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
115 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT)
|
241 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
186 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
MITT
|
46 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
Theophylline
|
91 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
80 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
MITT or SITT
|
287 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
227 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received COPD Prescription for Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine
|
69 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 1Population: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field.
Participants with moderate acute exacerbation requiring no hospitalization, who received prescription for COPD maintenance treatment were reported for following categories; Use the maintenance treatment, LAMA, LABA, LABA/LAMA, ICS/LABA, Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT), MITT, Theophylline, MITT or SITT, N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine. Participants may have received more than one COPD maintenance treatment. Hence, they may have counted in more than one category, so the total may not match to Number analyzed (N).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Moderate Acute Exacerbation Requiring no Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Follow-up (Week 1)
Use the maintenance treatment
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Moderate Acute Exacerbation Requiring no Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Follow-up (Week 1)
LAMA
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Moderate Acute Exacerbation Requiring no Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Follow-up (Week 1)
LABA
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Moderate Acute Exacerbation Requiring no Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Follow-up (Week 1)
LABA/LAMA
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Moderate Acute Exacerbation Requiring no Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Follow-up (Week 1)
ICS/LABA
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Moderate Acute Exacerbation Requiring no Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Follow-up (Week 1)
Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT)
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Moderate Acute Exacerbation Requiring no Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Follow-up (Week 1)
MITT
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Moderate Acute Exacerbation Requiring no Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Follow-up (Week 1)
Theophylline
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Moderate Acute Exacerbation Requiring no Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Follow-up (Week 1)
MITT or SITT
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Moderate Acute Exacerbation Requiring no Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Follow-up (Week 1)
N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Discharge follow-up (up to 28 days)Population: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field.
Participants with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization who received prescription for COPD maintenance treatment were reported for following categories; Use the maintenance treatment. LAMA, LABA, LABA/LAMA, ICS/LABA, Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT), MITT, Theophylline, MITT or SITT, N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine. Participants may have received more than one COPD maintenance treatment. Hence, they may have counted in more than one category, so the total may not match to Number analyzed (N).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Acute Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Discharge Follow-up (up to 28 Days)
Use the maintenance treatment
|
537 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Acute Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Discharge Follow-up (up to 28 Days)
LAMA
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Acute Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Discharge Follow-up (up to 28 Days)
LABA
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Acute Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Discharge Follow-up (up to 28 Days)
LABA/LAMA
|
63 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Acute Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Discharge Follow-up (up to 28 Days)
ICS/LABA
|
131 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Acute Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Discharge Follow-up (up to 28 Days)
Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT)
|
196 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Acute Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Discharge Follow-up (up to 28 Days)
MITT
|
51 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Acute Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Discharge Follow-up (up to 28 Days)
Theophylline
|
164 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Acute Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Discharge Follow-up (up to 28 Days)
MITT or SITT
|
247 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Acute Exacerbation Requiring Hospitalization by Each COPD Maintenance Treatment at Discharge Follow-up (up to 28 Days)
N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine
|
157 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Baseline (Day 1)Population: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field.
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one minute. FEV1 measurements were collected using a spirometer. The measurement at Baseline visit (Day 1) was defined as Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=600 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Forced Expiratory Volume in One Minute (FEV1) at Baseline
|
1.424 Liters
Standard Deviation 0.6313
|
1.405 Liters
Standard Deviation 0.6178
|
1.137 Liters
Standard Deviation 0.5312
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 1 year prior to Baseline (Day 1) visitPopulation: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. All participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
Number of participants with history of exacerbations were reported according to the usage of different patterns of maintenance therapy including LAMA, LABA, LABA/LAMA, ICS/LABA, Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT), MITT, Theophylline, MITT or SITT, N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine. The measurement at Baseline visit (Day 1) was defined as Baseline. Participants may have received more than one COPD maintenance treatment. Hence, they may have counted in more than one category, so the total may not match to Number analyzed (N).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With History of Exacerbations in Within 1 Year Prior to Baseline
LAMA
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With History of Exacerbations in Within 1 Year Prior to Baseline
LABA
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With History of Exacerbations in Within 1 Year Prior to Baseline
LABA/LAMA
|
36 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With History of Exacerbations in Within 1 Year Prior to Baseline
ICS/LABA
|
46 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
92 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With History of Exacerbations in Within 1 Year Prior to Baseline
Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT)
|
52 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
97 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With History of Exacerbations in Within 1 Year Prior to Baseline
MITT
|
22 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With History of Exacerbations in Within 1 Year Prior to Baseline
Theophylline
|
45 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
326 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With History of Exacerbations in Within 1 Year Prior to Baseline
MITT or SITT
|
74 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
147 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With History of Exacerbations in Within 1 Year Prior to Baseline
N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine
|
27 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
174 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Pre-Baseline (Within 1 month before Baseline [Day 1] visit)Population: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field.
Number of participants with COPD medication history were reported for following categories; Use the maintenance treatment, LAMA, LABA, LABA/LAMA, ICS/LABA, Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT), MITT, Theophylline, MITT or SITT, N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine. The measurement at Baseline visit (Day 1) was defined as Baseline. Participants may have received more than one COPD maintenance treatment. Hence, they may have counted in more than one category, so the total may not match to Number analyzed (N).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With COPD Medication History
Use the maintenance treatment
|
523 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
476 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With COPD Medication History
LAMA
|
75 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With COPD Medication History
LABA
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With COPD Medication History
LABA/LAMA
|
108 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With COPD Medication History
ICS/LABA
|
136 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
92 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With COPD Medication History
Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT)
|
134 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
98 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With COPD Medication History
MITT
|
49 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With COPD Medication History
Theophylline
|
105 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
330 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With COPD Medication History
MITT or SITT
|
183 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
148 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With COPD Medication History
N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine
|
73 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
175 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 3 monthsPopulation: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. All participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
The CAT is an 8-item unidimensional measure of health status impairment in participants with COPD. Participants are scored on eight items (cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, activity limitation, confidence, sleep and energy) on a scale of 0 (no impact) to 5 (worst possible impact) depending on their impact. The sum of scores for each item gives the participant's impact score ranging from 0 (no impact) to 40 (worst possible impact). Higher score indicates worst possible impact. CAT score by historic treatments including LAMA, LABA, LABA/LAMA, ICS/LABA, Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT), MITT, Theophylline, MITT or SITT, N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine were reported. Participants may have received more than one COPD maintenance treatment. Hence, they may have counted in more than one category, so the total may not match to Number analyzed (N). Mean and standard deviation (SD) values of CAT score assessments at 3 months are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) Scores by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
LAMA
|
12.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.27
|
—
|
19.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.73
|
|
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) Scores by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
LABA
|
27.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
—
|
—
|
|
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) Scores by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
LABA/LAMA
|
13.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.03
|
16.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.06
|
18.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.54
|
|
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) Scores by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
ICS/LABA
|
14.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.78
|
14.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.07
|
18.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.43
|
|
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) Scores by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT)
|
13.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.96
|
14.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.04
|
21.5 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.12
|
|
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) Scores by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
MITT
|
13.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.15
|
15.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.02
|
20.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.49
|
|
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) Scores by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
Theophylline
|
14.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.04
|
11.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.32
|
19.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.30
|
|
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) Scores by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
MITT or SITT
|
13.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.27
|
14.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.08
|
21.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.90
|
|
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) Scores by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine
|
13.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.68
|
14.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.54
|
19.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.60
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 3 monthsPopulation: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. All participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
The mMRC questionnaire predicts future mortality risk with mMRC. Participants are required to rate their disability due to shortness of breath on the 5-point mMRC scale ranging from 0 (no impact) to 4 (worst possible impact). Higher score indicates worst possible impact. The mMRC score by historic treatments including LAMA, LABA, LABA/LAMA, ICS/LABA, Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT), MITT, Theophylline, MITT or SITT, N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine were reported. Participants may have received more than one COPD maintenance treatment. Hence, they may have counted in more than one category, so the total may not match to Number analyzed (N). Mean and SD values of mMRC score assessments at 3 months are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
LAMA
|
1.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
—
|
2.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
|
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
LABA
|
2.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated for a single participant.
|
—
|
—
|
|
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
LABA/LAMA
|
1.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
2.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
|
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
ICS/LABA
|
1.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
1.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
2.1 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
|
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT)
|
1.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
2.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
|
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
MITT
|
1.8 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
2.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
2.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
|
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
Theophylline
|
1.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
1.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
2.2 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
|
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
MITT or SITT
|
1.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
2.0 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
2.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
|
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score by Historic Treatments at Indicated Time Point
N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine
|
1.7 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
2.3 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
1.9 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1)Population: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field.
DECAF is a 7-point scale with a minimum score of 0 (better outcome) and a maximum score of 6 (worse outcome). Higher score indicates worst outcome. It is used for assessment of severity of COPD exacerbation measures Dyspnea, Eosinopenia, consolidation, acidemia and atrial fibrillation. Number of participants requiring hospitalization by their each DECAF risk groups Mild (0-1 score), moderate (2 score), severe (3-6 score) were summarized. Participants who did not provide scores were categorized under "Missing". The measurement at Baseline visit (Day 1) was defined as Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Requiring Hospitalization by Their Each Dyspnea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidemia and Atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) Risk Group
Mild
|
503 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Requiring Hospitalization by Their Each Dyspnea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidemia and Atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) Risk Group
Moderate
|
49 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Requiring Hospitalization by Their Each Dyspnea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidemia and Atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) Risk Group
Severe
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Requiring Hospitalization by Their Each Dyspnea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidemia and Atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) Risk Group
Missing
|
58 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 3 monthsPopulation: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field.
Number of participants with at least one co-morbidity were reported. Co-morbidities included Vascular disorders, Cardiac disorders, Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders, Metabolism and nutrition disorders, Infections and infestations, Gastrointestinal disorders, Reproductive system and breast disorders, Hepatobiliary disorders, Nervous system disorders, Renal and urinary disorders, Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, Injury, poisoning and procedural complications, Psychiatric disorders, Endocrine disorders, Blood and lymphatic system disorders, Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (including cysts and polyps), Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, Eye disorders, Investigations, General disorders and administration site conditions, Ear and labyrinth disorders, Congenital, familial and genetic disorders, Immune system disorders and Surgical and medical procedures).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With at Least One Co-morbidity
|
512 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
571 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1)Population: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field.
Questions were asked to participants to understand their following socio-economic factors associated with different patterns of COPD maintenance treatment;Education(No formal education, Elementary,Middle,High school-including vocational school, Bachelor's degree and above, Missing), Local permanent resident(No,Yes, Missing), Marriage condition(Married,Divorced/Separated,Widowed,Unmarried and Missing), With whom usually live(Live alone, With spouse, With one specific child, Take turns in different children's homes, Other relatives, Missing), National basic medical insurance (Insu.)(None,Government medical insu.,Urban employee medical insu., Urban resident medical insu., New cooperative medical insu., Urban and rural resident basic medical insu., Serious illness insu., Missing) and Commercial insu.(Yes,No,Missing). Participants may have provided more than one answers to questions. Hence, they may have counted in more than one category, so the total may not match to Number analyzed (N).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Marriage condition; Divorced/Separated
|
19 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Marriage condition; Widowed
|
54 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Marriage condition; Unmarried
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Marriage condition; Missing
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
With whom usually live; Live alone
|
84 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
With whom usually live; With spouse
|
612 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
415 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
With whom usually live; With one specific child
|
175 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
173 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
With whom usually live; Take turns in different children's homes
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
With whom usually live; Other relatives
|
7 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
With whom usually live; Missing
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
National basic medical insurance; None
|
9 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
National basic medical insurance; Government medical insurance
|
13 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
National basic medical insurance; Urban employee medical insurance
|
395 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
260 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
National basic medical insurance; Urban resident medical insurance
|
111 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
99 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
National basic medical insurance; New cooperative medical insurance
|
176 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
195 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
National basic medical insurance; Urban and rural resident basic medical insurance
|
89 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
National basic medical insurance; Serious illness insurance
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
National basic medical insurance; Missing
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Commercial insurance; No
|
727 Participants
|
65 Participants
|
564 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Commercial insurance; Yes
|
68 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Commercial insurance; Missing
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Education; No formal education
|
38 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Education; Elementary school
|
219 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
187 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Education; Middle school
|
286 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
214 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Education; High school-including vocational school
|
167 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
118 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Education; Bachelor's degree and above
|
85 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Education; Missing
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Local permanent resident; No
|
69 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
89 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Local permanent resident; Yes
|
726 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
518 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Local permanent resident; Missing
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Socio-economic Characteristics
Marriage condition; Married
|
717 Participants
|
66 Participants
|
516 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Discharge follow-up (up to 28 days) and at 3 monthsPopulation: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
The CAT is an 8-item unidimensional measure of health status impairment in participants with COPD. Participants are scored on eight items (cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, activity limitation, confidence, sleep and energy) on a scale of 0 (no impact) to 5 (worst possible impact) depending on their impact. The sum of scores for each item gives the participant's impact score ranging from 0 (no impact) to 40 (worst possible impact). Higher score indicates worst possible impact. Number of participants by their CAT scores were reported (\<=10, 11 to 20, 21 to 30, 31 to 40). Participants who did not provide scores were categorized under "Missing". The measurement at Baseline visit (Day 1) was defined as Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
At 3 months; Score 11 to 20
|
238 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
213 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Baseline (Day 1); Score <=10
|
300 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
109 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Baseline (Day 1); Scores 11 to 20
|
318 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
250 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Baseline (Day 1); Scores 21 to 30
|
148 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
199 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Baseline (Day 1); Scores 31 to 40
|
30 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Baseline (Day 1); Missing
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Week 1; Score <=10
|
—
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Week 1; Scores 11 to 20
|
—
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Week 1; Scores 21 to 30
|
—
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Week 1; Scores 31 to 40
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Week 1; Missing
|
—
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Discharge follow-up (up to 28 days); Score <=10
|
—
|
—
|
229 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Discharge follow-up (up to 28 days); Scores 11 to 20
|
—
|
—
|
246 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Discharge follow-up (up to 28 days); Scores 21 to 30
|
—
|
—
|
95 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Discharge follow-up (up to 28 days); Scores 31 to 40
|
—
|
—
|
19 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
Discharge follow-up (up to 28 days); Missing
|
—
|
—
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
At 3 months; Score <=10
|
420 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
239 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
At 3 months; Score 21 to 30
|
90 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
At 3 months; Score 31 to 40
|
21 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Scores at Indicated Time Points
At 3 months; Missing
|
28 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Baseline (Day 1)Population: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field.
The mMRC questionnaire predicts future mortality risk with mMRC. Participants are required to rate their disability due to shortness of breath on the 5-point mMRC scale ranging from 0 (no impact) to 4 (worst possible impact). Higher score indicates worst possible impact. Number of participants by their mMRC scores (Scores 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4) were summarized. Participants who did not provide scores were categorized under "Missing". The measurement at Baseline visit (Day 1) was defined as Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants by Their Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score at Baseline
Score 0
|
127 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score at Baseline
Score 1
|
279 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
130 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score at Baseline
Score 2
|
258 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
202 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score at Baseline
Score 3
|
118 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
163 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score at Baseline
Score 4
|
14 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
78 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Their Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Score at Baseline
Missing
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 3 monthsPopulation: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field.
Number of participants whose prescribed maintenance therapy was stepped up (adding another maintenance therapy), stepped down (withdraw any of the maintenance medication but kept the maintenance therapy), stopped (stop all maintenance therapy), switched (between LAMA/LABA and ICS/LABA) or remained the same were reported. Participants whose treatment was not categorized in any of the above, were reported under Missing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Whose Prescribed Maintenance Treatment Was Stepped up, Stepped Down, Stopped, Switched, Remained the Same
Stepped up
|
67 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
180 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Whose Prescribed Maintenance Treatment Was Stepped up, Stepped Down, Stopped, Switched, Remained the Same
Stepped down
|
26 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Whose Prescribed Maintenance Treatment Was Stepped up, Stepped Down, Stopped, Switched, Remained the Same
Stopped
|
25 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Whose Prescribed Maintenance Treatment Was Stepped up, Stepped Down, Stopped, Switched, Remained the Same
Switched
|
9 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Whose Prescribed Maintenance Treatment Was Stepped up, Stepped Down, Stopped, Switched, Remained the Same
Remained the same
|
568 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
186 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Whose Prescribed Maintenance Treatment Was Stepped up, Stepped Down, Stopped, Switched, Remained the Same
Missing
|
102 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
217 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 3 monthsPopulation: Analysis data set which included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' field.
Number of participants receiving COPD maintenance treatment including LAMA, LABA/LAMA, ICS/LABA, Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT), MITT, Theophylline, MITT or SITT, N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine were reported. Participants may have received more than one COPD maintenance treatment. Hence, they may have counted in more than one category, so the total may not match to Number analyzed (N).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 Participants
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Receiving COPD Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
LAMA
|
92 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Receiving COPD Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
LABA/LAMA
|
127 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Receiving COPD Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
ICS/LABA
|
136 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
109 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Receiving COPD Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA, SITT)
|
240 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
181 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Receiving COPD Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
MITT
|
51 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
46 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Receiving COPD Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
Theophylline
|
93 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
82 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Receiving COPD Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
MITT or SITT
|
291 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
227 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Receiving COPD Maintenance Treatment at 3 Months
N-acetyl cysteine/carbocysteine
|
80 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 participants at risk
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 participants at risk
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 participants at risk
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.38%
3/797 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
1.4%
1/71 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.33%
2/615 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.13%
1/797 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.00%
0/71 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.00%
0/615 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/797 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.00%
0/71 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.16%
1/615 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal perforation
|
0.00%
0/797 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.00%
0/71 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.16%
1/615 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.13%
1/797 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.00%
0/71 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.00%
0/615 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Participants Presenting With Stable Disease
n=797 participants at risk
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD presenting to clinics in a stable state (no exacerbation for at least 1 month) were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 2: Participants Presenting With a Moderate Acute Exacerbation Not Requiring Hospitalization
n=71 participants at risk
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with moderate acute exacerbations not requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
Cohort 3: Participants Requiring Hospitalization for an Acute Exacerbation
n=615 participants at risk
Participants with newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed COPD with acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization were included in this cohort.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.13%
1/797 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.00%
0/71 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.00%
0/615 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
0.13%
1/797 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.00%
0/71 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.00%
0/615 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
0.13%
1/797 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.00%
0/71 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
0.00%
0/615 • All-cause mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) were collected up to 3 months
All-cause mortality, SAEs and Non-SAEs were reported for Analysis Data Set (1483) since 24 participants from Enrolled Population (1507) did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria. Analysis data set included all participants from enrolled population excluding those who did not enter the study as they did not meet Protocol-defined eligibility criteria.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER