Individualized Response Assessment to Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Ovarian, Colorectal, Appendiceal, or Peritoneal Mesothelioma Histologies
NCT ID: NCT04847063
Last Updated: 2025-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE1
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-19
2031-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) removes tumors in the abdomen. HIPEC is heated chemotherapy that washes the abdomen. CRS and HIPEC may help people with peritoneal carcinomatosis. These are tumors that have spread to the lining of the abdomen from other cancers. Researchers think they can improve results of CRS and HIPEC by choosing the chemotherapy drugs used in HIPEC.
Objective:
To see if HIPEC after CRS can be improved, by testing different chemotherapy drugs, using a model called the SMART (Sample Microenvironment of Resected Metastatic Tumor) System.
Eligibility:
Adults ages 18 and older who have peritoneal carcinomatosis that cannot be fully removed safely with surgery.
Design:
Participants will be screened with:
Medical history
Physical exam
Blood and urine tests
Computed tomography (CAT) scan
Other imaging scans, as needed
Electrocardiogram (EKG)
Tumor biopsy, if needed
Laparoscopy. Small cuts will be made in the abdomen. A tube with a light and a camera will be used to see their organs.
Some screening tests will be repeated in the study.
Participants will enroll in NIH protocol #13C0176. This allows their tumor samples to be used in future research.
Participants will have CRS. As many of their visible tumors will be removed as possible. They will also have HIPEC. Two thin tubes will be put in their abdomen. They will get chemotherapy through one tube. It will be drained out through the other tube. They will be in the hospital for 7-21 days after surgery.
Participants will give tumor, blood, and fluid samples for research. They will complete surveys about their health and quality of life.
Participants will have follow-up visits over 5 years.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outcomes After Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Carboplatin Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Followed by Systemic Combination Chemotherapy for Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
NCT01767675
HOT: HIPEC in Ovarian Cancer as Initial Treatment
NCT02124421
Trial of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in Patients With Primary and Secondary Peritoneal Cancers
NCT03604653
HIPEC After Initial CRS in Patients Who Have Received NACT
NCT03540017
Surgery and Chemotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy After Surgery in Treating Patients With Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Uterine, or Peritoneal Cancer
NCT01970722
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Peritoneal carcinomatosis is uniformly fatal if untreated; improved outcomes are seen with aggressive cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
The selection of chemotherapeutic agent for HIPEC is largely based on primary tumor histology and provider preference as opposed to knowledge of the potential efficacy of a specific agent for an individual patient.
HIPEC is intended to target small or microscopic residual disease following complete cytoreduction; however, the actual efficacy and additional benefit of HIPEC is in question.
The SMART System provides an ideal platform upon which to perfuse small peritoneal tumor tissue implants and simulate HIPEC treatment ex vivo.
Tissue response to simulated ex vivo HIPEC treatment in the SMART System could inform chemotherapeutic agent selection for subsequent cytoreduction and intra-operative in vivo HIPEC treatments.
Objective:
To determine the correlation between ex vivo simulated HIPEC in the SMART System and in vivo HIPEC with respect to two measures of response to treatment: percent necrosis and Ki-67
Eligibility:
Histologically confirmed peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal, colorectal, ovarian, or peritoneal mesothelioma histologies
Absence of extra-abdominal metastatic disease
Participant deemed able to undergo complete cytoreduction
Age \>= 18 years of age
Design:
This is a Phase I study of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with randomization to one of two accepted HIPEC treatment regimens as determined by primary histology.
At the time of cytoreduction, representative peritoneal tumor biopsies will be obtained before and after intra-operative in vivo HIPEC treatment.
Tumor nodules harvested before intra-operative HIPEC will be placed in the SMART System, exposed to simulated ex vivo HIPEC treatment, and then perfused, with subsequent assessment of percent necrosis and Ki-67.
Tumor nodules harvested immediately after intra-operative HIPEC will be placed in the SMART System and perfused, with subsequent assessment of percent necrosis and Ki-67.
The correlation of percent necrosis and Ki-67 assessment following simulated ex vivo HIPEC and intra-operative in vivo HIPEC will be determined.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1/ HIPEC: Oxaliplatin Randomized treatment assignment
HIPEC with intraperitoneal oxaliplatin and IV 5-FU, randomly assigned
Heated Intraperitonial Chemotherapy
Heated Intraperitonial Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with with standardized doses of chemotherapeutic agents as indicated by the subject's Arm assignment
Oxaliplatin
Arm 1, intraperitoneal (IP) Oxaliplatin: 200 mg/m2 for 90 minutes, mixed in 250 mL of 5% dextrose solution. For oxaliplatin-based HIPEC, intravenous 5-fluorouracil given at a dose of 400 mg/m2 in 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride over 10 minutes, co-administered with intravenous leucovorin at 20 mg/m2 in a separate bag of 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride
5-Fluorouracil
Part of Arm 1, for oxaliplatin-based HIPEC: intravenous 5-fluorouracil given at a dose of 400 mg/m2 in 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride over 10 minutes, co-administered with intravenous leucovorin at 20 mg/m2 in a separate bag of 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride
2/ HIPEC: Mitomycin C Randomized treatment assignment
HIPEC with intraperitoneal mitomycin C, randomly assigned
Mitomycin C
Arm 2, intraperitoneal (IP) Mitomycin C monotherapy: dosing divided into two 60-mL syringes, 30 mg per syringe. 30 mg will be given at time = 0, and the remaining 10 mg of the dose will be given at time = 60 minutes. Part of Arm 4: Mitomycin C co-therapy 15 mg/m2 for 60 minutes, given at time = 0 with cisplatin
Heated Intraperitonial Chemotherapy
Heated Intraperitonial Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with with standardized doses of chemotherapeutic agents as indicated by the subject's Arm assignment
3/ HIPEC: Cisplatin, Doxorubicin Randomized treatment assignme
HIPEC with intraperitoneal cisplatin and doxorubicin, in addition to IV sodium thiosulfate, randomly assigned
Cisplatin
Part of Arms 3 and 4, intraperitoneal (IP)cisplatin co-therapy: 75 mg/m2 for 60 minutes, mixed in 1 L of 0.9% sodium chloride. For cisplatin-based HIPEC, intravenous sodium thiosulfate given as a loading dose of 7.5 g/m2 in 150 mL 0.9% sodium chloride at the time of introducing cisplatin into the perfusion circuit, followed by a 12-hour pump-based infusion of 25.56 g/m2 in 1 L 0.9% sodium chloride
Heated Intraperitonial Chemotherapy
Heated Intraperitonial Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with with standardized doses of chemotherapeutic agents as indicated by the subject's Arm assignment
Doxorubicin
Part of Arm 3: intraperitoneal (IP) Doxorubicin co-therapy 15 mg/m2 for 60 minutes, given at time = 0 with cisplatin
Sodium Thiosulfate
Part of Arms 3 and 4, for cisplatin-based HIPEC: intravenous sodium thiosulfate given as a loading dose of 7.5 g/m2 in 150 mL 0.9% sodium chloride at the time of introducing cisplatin into the perfusion circuit, followed by a 12-hour pump-based infusion of 25.56 g/m2 in 1 L 0.9% sodium chloride
4/ HIPEC: Cisplatin, Mitomycin C Randomized treatment assignme
HIPEC with intraperitoneal cisplatin and mitomycin C, in addition to IV sodium thiosulfate, randomly assigned
Mitomycin C
Arm 2, intraperitoneal (IP) Mitomycin C monotherapy: dosing divided into two 60-mL syringes, 30 mg per syringe. 30 mg will be given at time = 0, and the remaining 10 mg of the dose will be given at time = 60 minutes. Part of Arm 4: Mitomycin C co-therapy 15 mg/m2 for 60 minutes, given at time = 0 with cisplatin
Cisplatin
Part of Arms 3 and 4, intraperitoneal (IP)cisplatin co-therapy: 75 mg/m2 for 60 minutes, mixed in 1 L of 0.9% sodium chloride. For cisplatin-based HIPEC, intravenous sodium thiosulfate given as a loading dose of 7.5 g/m2 in 150 mL 0.9% sodium chloride at the time of introducing cisplatin into the perfusion circuit, followed by a 12-hour pump-based infusion of 25.56 g/m2 in 1 L 0.9% sodium chloride
Heated Intraperitonial Chemotherapy
Heated Intraperitonial Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with with standardized doses of chemotherapeutic agents as indicated by the subject's Arm assignment
Sodium Thiosulfate
Part of Arms 3 and 4, for cisplatin-based HIPEC: intravenous sodium thiosulfate given as a loading dose of 7.5 g/m2 in 150 mL 0.9% sodium chloride at the time of introducing cisplatin into the perfusion circuit, followed by a 12-hour pump-based infusion of 25.56 g/m2 in 1 L 0.9% sodium chloride
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mitomycin C
Arm 2, intraperitoneal (IP) Mitomycin C monotherapy: dosing divided into two 60-mL syringes, 30 mg per syringe. 30 mg will be given at time = 0, and the remaining 10 mg of the dose will be given at time = 60 minutes. Part of Arm 4: Mitomycin C co-therapy 15 mg/m2 for 60 minutes, given at time = 0 with cisplatin
Cisplatin
Part of Arms 3 and 4, intraperitoneal (IP)cisplatin co-therapy: 75 mg/m2 for 60 minutes, mixed in 1 L of 0.9% sodium chloride. For cisplatin-based HIPEC, intravenous sodium thiosulfate given as a loading dose of 7.5 g/m2 in 150 mL 0.9% sodium chloride at the time of introducing cisplatin into the perfusion circuit, followed by a 12-hour pump-based infusion of 25.56 g/m2 in 1 L 0.9% sodium chloride
Heated Intraperitonial Chemotherapy
Heated Intraperitonial Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with with standardized doses of chemotherapeutic agents as indicated by the subject's Arm assignment
Doxorubicin
Part of Arm 3: intraperitoneal (IP) Doxorubicin co-therapy 15 mg/m2 for 60 minutes, given at time = 0 with cisplatin
Oxaliplatin
Arm 1, intraperitoneal (IP) Oxaliplatin: 200 mg/m2 for 90 minutes, mixed in 250 mL of 5% dextrose solution. For oxaliplatin-based HIPEC, intravenous 5-fluorouracil given at a dose of 400 mg/m2 in 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride over 10 minutes, co-administered with intravenous leucovorin at 20 mg/m2 in a separate bag of 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride
5-Fluorouracil
Part of Arm 1, for oxaliplatin-based HIPEC: intravenous 5-fluorouracil given at a dose of 400 mg/m2 in 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride over 10 minutes, co-administered with intravenous leucovorin at 20 mg/m2 in a separate bag of 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride
Sodium Thiosulfate
Part of Arms 3 and 4, for cisplatin-based HIPEC: intravenous sodium thiosulfate given as a loading dose of 7.5 g/m2 in 150 mL 0.9% sodium chloride at the time of introducing cisplatin into the perfusion circuit, followed by a 12-hour pump-based infusion of 25.56 g/m2 in 1 L 0.9% sodium chloride
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Measurable or evaluable disease as defined by RECIST v1.1. criteria and/or by peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score.
* Participants must be assessed to be able to undergo complete cytoreduction, with laparoscopically assessed PCI score thresholds as indicated below:
* Primary Histology: Appendiceal/Colorectal/Ovarian / PCI Cutoff for Eligibility: Total Score \< 20 (out of 39 possible points)
* Primary Histology: Mesothelioma / PCI Cutoff for Eligibility: Total Score \<= 30 (out of 39 possible points)
* Age \>= 18 years.
* ECOG performance status \<= 1 (Karnofsky \>= 80%).
* Participants must have adequate organ and marrow function as defined below:
* Absolute neutrophil count \>= 1,000/mcL
* Platelets \>= 75,000/mcL
* Total bilirubin within normal institutional limits
* AST (SGOT)/ ALT (SGPT) \<= 3x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN), or \<= 5.0x ULN in participants with liver metastases (only)
* Creatinine within normal institutional limits
OR
--Creatinine clearance \>= 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 for participants with creatinine levels above institutional normal calculated using eGFR.
* Because therapeutic agents used in this trial are known to be teratogenic, individuals of child-bearing potential (IOCBP) and individuals who are able to father a child must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for 180 days after last study treatment.
* Ability of participant to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
* Ability and willingness to co-enroll on the tissue collection protocol 13C0176, Tumor, Normal Tissue and Specimens from Patients Undergoing Evaluation or Surgical Resection of Solid Tumors .
Exclusion Criteria
* Participants who have received intraperitoneal chemotherapy or other anti-cancer therapy within the last 4 weeks prior to the start of study treatment.
* Participants who have undergone major surgery within the last 12 weeks prior to the start of study treatment.
* History of allergic reactions attributed to platinum-containing compounds.
* History of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency (only participants with appendiceal or colorectal cancer).
* Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
* Pregnant individuals are excluded from this study because the protocol involves major abdominal surgery and chemotherapeutic agents with the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Note: Due to an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the participant, nursing (including breastfeeding) should be discontinued if the participant is undergoing treatment (i.e., nursing participants must agree to discontinue nursing activities).
* HIV-positive participants with detectable viral load despite antiretroviral therapy are ineligible because of participants increased risk of lethal infections when treated with marrow-suppressive therapy. HIV-positive participants who have undetectable viral load on antiretroviral therapy may be considered for this study only after consultation with a NIAID physician.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrew M Blakely, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
For more information at the NIH Clinical Center contact National Cancer Institute Referral Office
Role: primary
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21-C-0012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
210012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.