Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-02-20
2023-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intrapartum Ultrasonography in Labour Arrest
NCT04796155
Clinical Application of Intrapartum Ultrasound
NCT06442735
Transperineal Ultrasound and the Place of Sonopartograph in Travay Follow-up in Term Pregnancy
NCT06177080
Sonographic Assessment for Prediction of Labor Induction Success
NCT03944187
Transabdominal Cervical Length Predict Preterm Labor During Routine Antenatal Screening
NCT04313673
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The labor is divided into a latent phase (stage 0), an active phase (stage 1 and 2), and a third stage defined as the time period between the delivery of the baby and the delivery of the placenta. According to the classic definition, the onset of labor is when regular contractions have been established. The latent phase is characterized by painful contractions and cervical dilatation up to 5 cm in accordance with WHO.
The fetal descent in the birth canal is assessed by vaginal digital examinations and related to the ischial spine. ACOG has defined five stations above (-5) and below (+5) the level of the spine (0 stations). Minus five corresponds to the pelvic inlet, zero to the level of the ischial spine, and plus four corresponds to the pelvic floor.
Traditionally, labor progression has been assessed by digital examination of cervical dilatation and fetal descent. Recent studies, however, dispute these findings and found the clinical examination of fetal descent and position to be unprecise and subjective with a high interobserver variation. Dupuis et al. made an important contribution to this debate when he rigorously assessed the accuracy of station diagnosis with digital examinations. . This study provides evidence that digital assessment of fetal head station is unreliable.
However, a study from 2019 found a good correlation between clinical assessments and ultrasound examinations when only one experienced clinician and one trained ultrasound examiner compared their results.
In this study, we aim to evaluate the accuracy of and consistency between vaginal examination and transperineal ultrasound head station measurements.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Digital examination of fetal head decent in pregnant women
Pregnant women at 36 weeks or over gestational age in the active phase of the first stage or second stage of labor were examined by digital examination and fetal head station evaluated by two clinicians.
No interventions assigned to this group
Transperineal assessment of fetal head decent in pregnant women
Pregnant women at 36 weeks or over gestational age in the active phase of the first stage or second stage of labor were examined by transperineal ultrasound and fetal head station evaluated by two experienced clinicians.
Transperineal ultrasound
The fetal head station is evaluated by transperineal ultrasonography in valsalva.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transperineal ultrasound
The fetal head station is evaluated by transperineal ultrasonography in valsalva.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women at the active phase of the first stage of labor
* Pregnant women at the second stage of labor
Exclusion Criteria
* Fetal anomaly
* In utero ex fetus cases
* Trial of labor after cesarean cases
* Pregnant women at the latent phase of the first sage of labor
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Arzu Bilge Tekin
Specialist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Murat Yassa, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Specialist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sehit Prof Dr Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ciaciura-Jarno M, Cnota W, Wojtowicz D, Niesluchowska-Hoxha A, Ruci A, Kierach R, Stepien A, Nowak A, Sodowska P. Evaluation of selected ultrasonography parameters in the second stage of labor in prediction mode of delivery. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(6):448-53. doi: 10.5603/GP.2016.0024.
Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides KH. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;21(5):437-40. doi: 10.1002/uog.103.
Ramphul M, Ooi PV, Burke G, Kennelly MM, Said SA, Montgomery AA, Murphy DJ. Instrumental delivery and ultrasound : a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery. BJOG. 2014 Jul;121(8):1029-38. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12810. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, Redarce T, Rudigoz RC. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):868-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.028.
Iversen JK, Jacobsen AF, Mikkelsen TF, Eggebo TM. Structured clinical examinations in labor: rekindling the craft of obstetrics. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jun;34(12):1963-1969. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1651283. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
World Health Organization. Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. 2018. ISBN 978-92-4-155021-5
Brief History of Intrapartum Ultrasonography
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ITUSR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.