Correlation Between Selected Haematological and Doppler Ultrasonic Parameters in Peripheral Arterial Diseased Patients

NCT ID: NCT04830254

Last Updated: 2021-07-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-20

Study Completion Date

2021-05-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Forty patients of both sexes, aged between 50 and 60 years, were chosen from an outpatient vascular clinic in the El Sahel Education Hospital. Patients have been examined and referred to by a vascular specialist.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The participants were divided randomly into two groups of equal numbers. The study group got low-frequency TENS (4 Hz frequency, pulse duration 200 μs) which was administered through surface electrodes for 45 min per session, supramaximal stimulation for T12, L1, and L2 sympathetic ganglions that innervate the lower extremity for 45 min per session, three times per week and for 12 weeks. Control Group that received placebo stimulation as provided by the same TENS device but with a zero volt after 10 s of stimulation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

study group(A)

Group (A) included 20 patients who received low-frequency TENS (frequency 4 Hz, pulse duration 200 μs) for 45 min per session, three times per week, and for 12 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation(TENS) device

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Patients in group (A) received low-frequency TENS (frequency 4 Hz, pulse duration 200 μs,burst mode) was be applied through 2 output channels surface electrodes with an E2 TENS device, for 45 min per session, supramaximal stimulation to sympathetic ganglions in T12, L1, and L2, which innervate the lower extremity . For 45 min per session, three times per week, and for 12 weeks.

Control group(B)

The control group(B) included 20 patients who received placebo TENS stimulation but with a voltage level falling to zero after 10 s of stimulation

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation(TENS) device

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Patients in group (A) received low-frequency TENS (frequency 4 Hz, pulse duration 200 μs,burst mode) was be applied through 2 output channels surface electrodes with an E2 TENS device, for 45 min per session, supramaximal stimulation to sympathetic ganglions in T12, L1, and L2, which innervate the lower extremity . For 45 min per session, three times per week, and for 12 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation(TENS) device

The Patients in group (A) received low-frequency TENS (frequency 4 Hz, pulse duration 200 μs,burst mode) was be applied through 2 output channels surface electrodes with an E2 TENS device, for 45 min per session, supramaximal stimulation to sympathetic ganglions in T12, L1, and L2, which innervate the lower extremity . For 45 min per session, three times per week, and for 12 weeks.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TENS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Unilateral Leriche-Fontaine stage-II PAD
2. Both sexes
3. Aged 50 to 60 years
4. Outpatients
5. Clinically stable
6. Sedentary
7. Not participating in any physical activity last 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

1. Walking disorders related to orthopedic or neuromuscular disease
2. Renal insufficiency requiring dialysis (Renal diseases)
3. Known and documented myopathy
4. Progressive cancer
5. Associated progressive disease causing a deterioration in general health
6. Participation in another research protocol
7. Skin disorder making it impossible to use TENS
8. Absolute contraindication to physical activity
9. Presence of a pacemaker/defibrillator
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Heba Ahmed Ali Abdeen

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Physical Therapy

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TENS21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PEMT Versus WBV on Quadriceps Strength Post Burn
NCT06525103 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA