Effectiveness and Implementation of Montessori Approaches in Person-Centered Care Within VA

NCT ID: NCT04829500

Last Updated: 2025-02-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

356 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-01

Study Completion Date

2025-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Addressing behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms of Veterans with dementia and serious mental illness (SMI) such as schizophrenia can be challenging for staff in VA long-term care settings, called Community Living Centers or CLCs. These behaviors of distress (agitation, aggression, and mood disturbance) are not just associated with staff stress and burnout; they also hasten residents' functional decline, decrease quality of life, and increase mortality. Staff training in non-pharmacological interventions can be effective. Yet systems barriers, task-based care models, and time constraints often result in staff employing "quicker," less effective strategies. Montessori Approaches to Person-Centered Care for VA (MAP-VA)- a staff training, intervention, and delivery toolkit- developed in collaboration with VA operational partners, Veterans, and frontline CLC staff is positioned to respond to this challenge. The investigators' prior work shows probable impacts on CLC quality indicators at the individual and unit level (e.g., psychotropic medications, depressive symptoms, weight loss, falls, pain). The goal of this study is to evaluate the MAP-VA program and necessary supports for a successful implementation at 8 VA CLCs.

Significance/ Innovation: VHA's Modernization Plan focuses on empowering front-line staff to lead quality improvement efforts like the ones taught through MAP-VA. MAP-VA is distinct from existing interventions in its: 1) application to Veterans with a range of diagnoses and cognitive abilities; 2) emphasis on pairing practical skill-building for staff with overcoming system-level barriers that inhibit person-centered care; and 3) engagement of all staff rather than a reliance on provider-level champions. Yet, MAP-VA is a complex intervention that requires participation of multiple stakeholder groups, making implementation facilitation necessary. To date, no studies have evaluated MAP implementation success in operational settings (community or VA) and sustainability is rarely examined.

Aims: This 4-year study will examine both the effectiveness of the MAP-VA program on resident outcomes, person-centered care practices, and organizational culture as well as an evaluation of the implementation barriers to adopting MAP-VA in a sustainable way over a 12 month period. Staff and residents at 8 CLCs will participate in the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Specific Aims: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness study is necessary to evaluate MAP-VA for Veterans and staff in CLCs. Study Aims include: 1) evaluate implementation facilitation and identify barriers to MAP-VA adoption and fidelity; 2) determine effectiveness of MAP-VA implementation on resident behavioral, emotional, and physical health outcomes; 3) determine effectiveness of MAP-VA implementation on person-centered care practices and organizational culture; and 4) examine the extent to which MAP-VA is sustained after external facilitation support has ended.

Methodology: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial will be used to evaluate within- and between-cluster implementation success and treatment effects over 18 months. Eight CLCs (approximately 24 CLC neighborhoods) will be randomized to a sequential crossover to the intervention with six months of facilitation. Sequential balancing will be used during randomization to balance the sample over time. Analyses will account for time trends and correlations within cluster. Normalization process theory and the RE-AIM evaluation framework will guide the implementation evaluation and integration of qualitative and quantitative data. Data sources include primary data collection (e.g., resident interviews, staff interviews, surveys, researcher observation) and existing VA administrative data (e.g., Minimum Data Set 3.0, pharmacy, annual employee survey).

The unit of analysis in hybrid implementation-effectiveness designs is typically at the system level (in the investigators' case the CLC/neighborhood) since existing staff provide the intervention. To address the research questions and corresponding aims, the study approach assesses both the clinical innovation (MAP-VA) and the implementation process itself (Blended Facilitation). Implementation process measures, fidelity, and outcome indicators will be tracked using a mixed methods evaluation approach. Common features of SW-CRTs utilized in this study include: 1) a baseline collection phase where no clusters are exposed to the intervention; 2) sequential randomized crossover to the intervention (MAP-VA), which cannot be reversed once it has been introduced; and 3) analyses that account for time trends and correlations within clusters. Randomization of facilities to MAP-VA will simply delay its rollout to sites randomized later in the sequence (like a wait-list control condition).

Target sample size and analyses. A sample size of more than 200 CLC Staff and 96 Veteran residents are anticipated. Qualitative interview data will be analyzed using a content analytic approach. To test Aims 2 and 3 (effectiveness of MAP-VA) on the primary effectiveness outcome, scores for residents in the pre-intervention control condition will be compared to scores from residents in the intervention condition. GEE models with an identity link will be used to examine and compare means over time, with time considered a random effect. An indicator term will denote if the observation is pre- or post- intervention implementation, thus representing whether there was an overall difference during the intervention period versus the pre-intervention period.

A centralized Data Safety Monitoring Board coordinated through the study sponsor (VA Health Services R\&D) will convene to review study materials annually.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dementia or a Related Disorder Mental Health Diagnoses Symptoms of Agitation or Aggression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This 4-year, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (SW-CRT) uses a hybrid implementation-effectiveness design, and primary and administrative data collection to pursue four aims. Randomization in this hybrid implementation-effectiveness design is at the system level (in our case the CLC) since existing staff provide the intervention. To address the research questions and corresponding aims, the study approach assesses both the clinical innovation (MAP-VA) and the implementation process itself (blended facilitation). Implementation process measures, fidelity, and outcome indicators will be tracked using a mixed methods evaluation approach.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pre-Intervention Baseline Collection Phase

All sites will start with a baseline collection phase without exposure to the intervention, consistent with the stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design. A sequential randomized crossover to the intervention (MAP-VA) will be assigned, which cannot be reversed once it has been introduced.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

MAP-VA Intervention

Montessori approaches to person-centered care (MAP-VA) introduces practical strategies that frontline staff can use for successful engagement of residents through retained abilities such as implicit learning, procedural memory, reading abilities. Staff training provides practice with: 1) pre-developed activities and templates, 2) a simple reading assessment to inform development of external cues; and 3) identifying opportunities for increased independence and resident contribution to community routines. Staff are also introduced to concrete strategies that improve dignity, control, and independence.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Montessori Approaches to Person-Centered Care (MAP-VA)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Montessori approaches to person-centered care (MAP-VA) introduces practical strategies that frontline staff can use for successful engagement of residents through retained abilities. Staff are also introduced to concrete strategies that improve dignity, control, and independence. MAP-VA is based on the work of Maria Montessori who demonstrated that a structured, supportive environment and meaningful, active roles in the classroom enabled children to fulfill their greatest potential physically, mentally, and emotionally. Montessori principles have been applied to dementia care for more than 20 years to promote functional independence, meaningful engagement, and dignity.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Montessori Approaches to Person-Centered Care (MAP-VA)

Montessori approaches to person-centered care (MAP-VA) introduces practical strategies that frontline staff can use for successful engagement of residents through retained abilities. Staff are also introduced to concrete strategies that improve dignity, control, and independence. MAP-VA is based on the work of Maria Montessori who demonstrated that a structured, supportive environment and meaningful, active roles in the classroom enabled children to fulfill their greatest potential physically, mentally, and emotionally. Montessori principles have been applied to dementia care for more than 20 years to promote functional independence, meaningful engagement, and dignity.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Montessori Activity Programming, Montessori Inspired Lifestyle, Montessori for Dementia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Residents who meet at least one of the following eligibility criteria will be eligible:

* dementia diagnosis or related disorder
* Cognitive Function Scale score indicative of impairment
* positive Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) depression score
* mental health diagnosis (e.g., ICD-10 codes)
* indication of agitation or aggression per MDS behavior items
* active prescription for a PRN or scheduled antipsychotic, sedative/hypnotic, or benzodiazepine/anxiolytic

Exclusion Criteria

* Residents admitted for hospice or respite care
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Center for Applied Research in Dementia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Alabama at Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Providence VA Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

The VA Western New York Healthcare System

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

VA Salt Lake City Health Care System

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michelle Marie Hilgeman, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kennedy KA, Snow AL, Mills WL, Haigh S, Mochel A, Curyto K, Bishop T, Hartmann CW, Camp CJ, Hilgeman MM. Implementing Montessori approaches after training: A mixed methods study to examine staff understanding and movement toward action. Dementia (London). 2024 Oct;23(7):1126-1151. doi: 10.1177/14713012241263712. Epub 2024 Jul 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 39039035 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIR 19-413

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optimizing Dementia Care
NCT02585232 COMPLETED NA