Standardized Invasive Hemodynamics for Elevated Gradients Post TAVR (DISCORDANCE TAVR)
NCT ID: NCT04827238
Last Updated: 2025-07-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
49 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-08-30
2025-06-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
accuRate Evaluation of Benefit With Optimal Medical Treatment With or Without Transcatheter Valve Repair of PARADOXical Low Flow Low Gradient Aortic Stenosis
NCT03863132
Progression of Ascending Aorta Diameters in Bicuspid Aortic Valve After Transcatheter or Surgical Replacement.
NCT05708118
Reversibility of Cardiac Conduction Disturbances Following TAVI
NCT06481137
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Effects on Cardiac Conduction System
NCT04982406
TAVR: The Impact of Prothesis Positioning on Valvular and Coronary Hemodynamics
NCT06896227
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The utility of echocardiography to successfully determine aortic valve gradients and AVA has been established in the presence of AS, and such observations have been extrapolated to prosthetic valves. However, several reports following SAVR and TAVR for both native and valve-in-valve have demonstrated significant discordance between echocardiography-derived and direct invasive measurements of aortic valve mean gradients.
The indexed AVA (iAVA) is derived from the stroke volume indexed to the BSA. The stroke volume index (SVI) divided by the Doppler velocity time integral of the continuous wave aortic valve spectral profile, is used to determine the presence of severe PPM. As such, a low iAVA may occur due to a low flow state defined by a reduced SVI (\<35 ml/m2) or a reduced stroke flow rate (\< 200 ml/second) and calculated by dividing the SV by the ejection time spuriously increasing the incidence of severe PPM. A low indexed effective orifice area due to a low SVI, in the absence of intrinsic PPM, has been referred to as "pseudo-severe PPM", but the impact of flow state on PPM has not been described.
Nonetheless, echocardiographic thresholds for the evaluation of prosthetic valve performance after TAVR have been widely adopted: mean-gradient \> 20mmHg, severe PPM as defined by an iAVA \< 0.65 cm2/m2, and AR, including paravalvular and transvalvular AR of moderate or greater severity. These criteria are suggested to indicate procedural success and predict long-term clinical outcomes (12). Practically many centers utilize an echocardiography-derived mean gradient for the follow-up of transcatheter heart valves. While the association of at least moderate paravalvular AR with mortality has been consistently demonstrated, there remains uncertainty regarding the clinical impact of severe PPM as determined by index echocardiography. Furthermore, the magnitude of discordance between echocardiography-derived and invasive aortic valve mean-gradients post TAVR is unknown and it remains unclear how to reconcile measurement discordances in clinical practice. These potential differences may have an important impact on patient management post TAVR.
The DISCORDANCE TAVR study will determine the discordance between echocardiography-derived and invasive transaortic gradients, as determined by a consistent and reproducible technique (Standardized Invasive Hemodynamics) post-TAVR.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with Elevated Gradients Post Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Patients who have an echocardiographic transaortic mean gradient ≥ 20mmHg OR VARC-3 criteria for ≥ moderate hemodynamic valve deterioration post TAVR on any TTE \> 1 month post-TAVR
Standardized Invasive Hemodynamics
The SIH technique is a standardized, reproducible and efficient way of obtaining hemodynamic measurements.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standardized Invasive Hemodynamics
The SIH technique is a standardized, reproducible and efficient way of obtaining hemodynamic measurements.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Consensus by the Heart Team that the patient is suitable for Standardized Invasive Hemodynamics (SIH).
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Edwards Lifesciences
INDUSTRY
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Wood
Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Wood, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of British Columbia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
PIMA Heart Centre
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Tenet Health
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
eCommunity
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Community Hospital
Munster, Indiana, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
William Beaumont Hospital
Southfield, Michigan, United States
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H21-00824
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.