Effects of Dexmedetomidine in Patients With Agitated Delirium in Palliative Care
NCT ID: NCT04824144
Last Updated: 2025-04-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE1/PHASE2
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-30
2026-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dexmedetomidine Sublingual Film for the Management of Agitation in Delirium: Safety and Preliminary Efficacy
NCT04382170
Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Delirium Duration of Non-intubated ICU Patients (4D Trial)
NCT03317067
A Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Haloperidol in Patients With Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-Associated Agitation and Delirium
NCT00505804
Randomized Controlled Trial of Dexmedetomidine for the Treatment of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Delirium
NCT00351299
Dexmedetomidine to Lessen Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Agitation
NCT01151865
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, studies demonstrate distress associated with delirium is greater among family members compared to that experienced by patients. In the context of palliative care, agitated delirium in the dying phase is particularly devastating for family members - the inability to meaningfully communicate with a loved one during final interactions with them, and to witness the visible distress that characterizes agitated delirium, can cause significant anguish. Several studies demonstrate severe levels of distress among a majority of caregivers who have cared for a loved one with delirium. Family members of patients with terminal delirium report negative physical and psychological burden associated with delirium, including family member feelings of distress, anxiety, and helplessness, exhaustion, and difficulty coping. Additionally, caregiver-perceived delirium in the last 6 months of life has been found to be associated with significantly increased risk - up to 12x - of symptoms of generalized anxiety among family caregivers. In particular, patient symptoms characteristic of agitated delirium, such as restlessness and agitation, psychotic symptoms, cognitive impairment, and communication difficulties, are associated with greater levels of psychological and emotional distress among family members. Bereaved family members express experiencing anger and sadness that they could not have meaningful interactions with their loved one at the end of life, and felt delirium robbed them prematurely of these interactions before death and hindered their opportunity to say goodbye. Family members have further described this phenomenon as distress related to premature loss of the caregiver-patient relationship and the loss of a familiar person becoming a stranger. Family members also report distress related to decision-making that balances their desire for meaningful communication at the end of life with reducing patient suffering. Most commonly, this dilemma is manifested in family member decisions around the use of sedation.
Agitated delirium also has a marked impact on nursing staff and their ability to assess patient needs. Qualitative investigations of palliative care nurses' experiences caring for patients with delirium found nurses had difficulty managing patient delirium in a way they felt maintained patients' dignity and "minimized chaos", and reported delirium and related symptoms were highly distressing for them. Specifically, delirium-related distress experienced by nurses has been shown to be significantly associated with patient delirium severity and the presence and severity of perceptual disturbances. Clinical professionals have also expressed negative effects of delirium on their interactions with family members, with disagreements and tension arising from different understandings of patient needs.
There is limited evidence to support the use of pharmacological interventions for the management of delirium symptoms in palliative care patients, and no medication currently approved in Canada for the indication of delirium. However, published guidelines do recognize a limited role for the use of medications (such as low doses of antipsychotics and/or benzodiazepines) in distressed delirious patients or if there are safety concerns. Among imminently dying patients, pharmacological sedation (e.g., with midazolam, methotrimeprazine, or phenobarbital) is often used to manage agitated delirium; however, use of these medications to manage delirium in the dying phase is based on case series and expert opinion. More broadly, clinical guidelines and systematic reviews of palliative pharmacological sedation conclude that evidence for the efficacy of sedation for symptom control using these medications is insufficient. Additionally, sedation to treat agitated delirium is limited in that it generally eliminates patients' ability to be alert and interact with others, a limitation that, as outlined above, is often contrary to patients' goals of care and the well-being of family members. There is a need for alternative interventions that better align with patients' goals of care and support patients, family members, and clinical staff through meaningful communication at the end of life.
An increasing number of small case series and reviews suggest dexmedetomidine may be an effective and safe option for managing agitated delirium in palliative care. Dexmedetomidine is a centrally active alpha-2 receptor agonist that has mild sedative and opioid co-analgesic effects without suppressing respiratory drive. In most acute care hospital settings, dexmedetomidine is restricted for use in the intensive care unit and by anesthesia for short term sedation. Delirium treatment and prevention has commonly been studied as a secondary endpoint in clinical trials of sedation for critically ill patients, largely demonstrating the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine for delirium management over currently used medications in palliative care, including haloperidol, midazolam, and propofol. Given dexmedetomidine is currently the only agent recommended for treatment of agitated delirium in critically ill patients, pilot data reports have emerged regarding its use in other settings where agitated delirium is highly prevalent, namely palliative care. The largest and most recent case series (n=6) of dexmedetomidine to manage agitated delirium reported improved patient agitation and distress in all cases while maintaining a rousable, conscious state, providing patients the opportunity to interact with others at the end of life. Similarly, additional case studies of agitated delirium in palliative care (total n=4) have all reported successful resolution and/or symptom control of patients' agitated delirium at the end of life. In terms of dosage, these therapeutic benefits were predominantly achieved with moderate to high doses of dexmedetomidine (e.g., 0.5 mcg/kg/hr-1.5 mcg/kg/hr). Similarly, initial findings from our unpublished retrospective case series of dexmedetomidine to manage agitated delirium in palliative care (n=10) revealed moderate success at dose levels of 0.4 mcg/kg/hr-0.7 mcg/kg/hr, but minimal success at low dose levels of 0.2 mcg/kg/hr-0.3 mcg/kg/hr.
In contrast to other medications commonly used to manage agitated delirium, dexmedetomidine provides rousable sedation, better supporting communication needs and goals of care at the end of life. Dexmedetomidine is now off-patent, reducing previous cost barriers to use. In addition, while dexmedetomidine is administered intravenously in critical care, advance preparation for subcutaneous administration is more conducive to use in palliative care. To facilitate this, our team recently completed stability testing and demonstrated \>90% retention of dexmedetomidine 20mcg/ml in 0.9% sodium chloride in polyvinylchloride bags after 9 days of storage at both room temperature (25°C ± 2°C) and refrigeration (4°C ± 2°C ) (accepted for publication). Furthermore, evidence demonstrates subcutaneous administration of dexmedetomidine results in a relative bioavailability of about 80%.
The investigators propose to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of dexmedetomidine for the management of agitated delirium in palliative care. There are currently no approved therapies for agitated delirium in palliative care, but evidence from critical care, reduced medication costs, and published case series in palliative care suggest dexmedetomidine may be effective to treat this challenging condition. A therapy that might treat delirium without causing excess sedation, allowing patients to continue interactions with their loved ones and care team, would be a "game changer" in palliative care. There is the potential to improve end-of-life care for patients and their families in a manner that is more consistent with their goals of care and provides necessary symptom management while reducing the distress experienced by family and healthcare team members.
Details of Eligibility, Intervention Protocol, and Outcome Measures are provided elsewhere.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dexmedetomidine subcutaneous continuous infusion
Participants will be given a starting low dose of 0.4 mcg/kg/hr, to be titrated up to a medium dose of 0.7 mcg/kg/hr and potentially up to a maximum dose of 1.0 mcg/kg/hr by subcutaneous infusion until the target RASS-PAL level has been achieved.
Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride
Dexmedetomidine will be administered by subcutaneous continuous infusion using a Continuous Ambulatory Delivery Device (CADD pump).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride
Dexmedetomidine will be administered by subcutaneous continuous infusion using a Continuous Ambulatory Delivery Device (CADD pump).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Admitted to a participating inpatient palliative care unit
3. Meeting one of the following criteria:
1. Agitated delirium: (i) Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale for palliative care patients (RASS-PAL) score of +2 or greater and (ii) Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) positive status and (iii) Without a known potentially reversible cause (e.g. hypercalcemia, specific medication infection, etc.), or in whom the patient/Substitute Decision Maker (SDM) has requested not to treat the cause.
2. Previous history of delirium (in the last 6 months)
3. Patient is within the last two weeks of life and is expected to die during this admission (MRP judgement)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Bradyarrhythmia (heart rate \< 60) at baseline
3. Patients on verapamil, diltiazem, or beta-blocker (patients are eligible if these medications are stopped prior to receiving dexmedetomidine)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Ottawa Hospital
OTHER
Bruyère Continuing Care
UNKNOWN
Foothills Medical Centre
OTHER
Bruyère Health Research Institute.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
James Downar
Head, Division of Palliative Care
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James Downar, MDCM, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Bruyère Health Research Institute.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Bruyère Continuing Care
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Jennifer Hughes, MD
Role: primary
Henrique Parsons, MD
Role: primary
Peter Lawlor, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
339633386643463
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.