Oral Akynzeo® vs Standard of Care in Preventing CINV in High-risk MEC Patients (MyRisk)

NCT ID: NCT04817189

Last Updated: 2025-12-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

414 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-01

Study Completion Date

2024-07-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

MyRisk: Efficacy and safety evaluation of oral Akynzeo® in patients receiving MEC at high risk of developing CINV based on a prediction tool. A multinational and multicenter study.

Antiemetic guidelines recommendations are based on the emetogenic potential of the chemotherapy. Chemotherapy (CT) agents are divided in Highly, Moderately, Low and Minimally Emetogenic potential.

In addition to type of chemotherapy, several patient-related risk factors can increase the risk of CINV (chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting). Currently, there is limited consensus surrounding the most relevant patient risk factors that may predict the risk of CINV. Based on a recent study by Dranitsaris et al. (Dranitsaris et al. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1; 28(6):1260-1267.), eight (8) predictive factors have been identified and an algorithm has been developed to incorporate these factors into the optimal selection of prophylactic antiemetics:

1. nausea and/or vomiting in the prior cycle of chemotherapy
2. use of non-prescribed antiemetics at home in the prior cycle of chemotherapy
3. platinum or anthracycline-based chemotherapy
4. age \< 60 years
5. expectations for (anticipating) nausea and/or vomiting
6. \<7 h of sleep the night before chemotherapy
7. history of morning sickness during previous pregnancy
8. cycle of chemotherapy (A negative association between risk and number of cycles was identified where the hazard for CINV was highest in cycles 1 and 2, with a gradual decline and plateau from cycle 3 onward).

The clinical application of this prediction tool has the potential to be an important resource for clinicians and may help to enhance patient care by optimizing the use of the antiemetics in a proactive manner.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Antiemetic guideline recommendations are based on the emetogenic potential of chemotherapy and involve 4 levels of classification of intravenous chemotherapy agents, i.e., high, moderate, low and minimal; these have been accepted by major organisations. Moderate emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) results in acute vomiting in 30% to 90% of cancer patients in the absence of antiemetic therapy. In addition to the chemotherapy type, several patient-related risk factors and clinical characteristics can increase CINV risk. These can include use of antiemetics inconsistent with international guidelines, younger age, prechemotherapy nausea, no complete CINV response in an earlier cycle, history of nausea/vomiting, (trait) anxiety, fatigue experience, and expectations of nausea/vomiting. Other studies have largely confirmed some of the key risk factors for CINV (history of vomiting during pregnancy, history of motion sickness, age, gender) and added other factors such as (chronic) alcohol consumption, body surface area, fewer hours slept the night prior to infusion, or advanced stage cancer. Currently, there is a limited consensus surrounding the most relevant patient risk factors that may predict CINV risk. Based on a recent study by Dranitsaris et al. eight predictive factors have been identified, and an algorithm has been developed to combine these patient-related risk factors into the optimal treatment of prophylactic antiemetics. These include:

1. nausea and/or vomiting in the prior cycle of chemotherapy
2. use of non-prescribed antiemetics at home in the prior cycle of chemotherapy
3. platinum or anthracycline-based chemotherapy
4. age \< 60 years
5. expectations for (anticipating) nausea and/or vomiting
6. \<7 h of sleep the night before chemotherapy
7. history of morning sickness during previous pregnancy
8. cycle of chemotherapy (A negative association between risk and number of cycles was identified where the hazard for CINV was highest in cycles 1 and 2, with a gradual decline and plateau from cycle 3 onward).

Akynzeo®, an oral combination of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists (NK1 RA), netupitant and the 5-hydroxytryptamine (HT3) receptor antagonists (5-HT3 RA), palonosetron, is recommended by guidelines for the prevention of CINV. Akynzeo® has been evaluated in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy phase II clinical trial at various dose ranges among 694 cisplatin-treated cancer patients from 44 sites (two countries); each NEPA (netupitant-palonosetron) dose significantly improves CINV prevention in cancer patients. Similar results were obtained in another international, randomised, double-blind and parallel group phase III clinical trial; NEPA prevented CINV in patients receiving MEC.

The current study primarily aimed to evaluate whether Akynzeo® leads to a higher response rate compared with standard care in MEC regimen-treated patients who are identified to be at high risk based on the algorithm.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

interventional, open label, randomized, active controlled, parallel arms, multicenter and multinational study
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NEPA (300mg netupitant/0.5mg palonosetron) + Dexamethasone 8 mg

Oral netupitant/palonosetron (300 mg/0.50 mg) fixed-dose combination on Day 1 of each cycle.

Dexamethasone (8 mg) will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dexamethasone, 8 mg (oral) or equivalent IV dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone (8 mg) will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle.

NEPA (300mg netupitant/0.5mg palonosetron)

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral netupitant/palonosetron (300 mg/0.50 mg) fixed-dose combination on Day 1 of each cycle.

Standard of care + Dexamethasone 8 mg

Dexamethasone (or equivalent corticosteroids) 8 mg administered by the oral route (or equivalent IV dose) on Day 1, approximately 1 hour before chemotherapy and one of the 5-HT3-RAs recommended by European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) guidelines (standard of care), i.e. either:

Granisetron, 2 mg (oral) or 1 mg (IV) OR Palonosetron, 0.5 mg (oral), 0.25mg (IV) OR Ondansetron, 16 mg (oral) or 8 mg (IV) OR Dolasetron 100 mg (oral) OR Tropisetron 5 mg (oral or IV)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Granisetron, 2 mg (oral) or 1 mg (IV) OR Palonosetron, 0.5 mg (oral), 0.25mg (IV) OR Ondansetron, 16 mg (oral) or 8 mg (IV) OR Dolasetron 100 mg (oral) OR Tropisetron 5 mg (oral or IV)

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard of care will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle.

Dexamethasone, 8 mg (oral) or equivalent IV dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone (8 mg) will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Granisetron, 2 mg (oral) or 1 mg (IV) OR Palonosetron, 0.5 mg (oral), 0.25mg (IV) OR Ondansetron, 16 mg (oral) or 8 mg (IV) OR Dolasetron 100 mg (oral) OR Tropisetron 5 mg (oral or IV)

Standard of care will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexamethasone, 8 mg (oral) or equivalent IV dose

Dexamethasone (8 mg) will be administered on Day 1 of each cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

NEPA (300mg netupitant/0.5mg palonosetron)

Oral netupitant/palonosetron (300 mg/0.50 mg) fixed-dose combination on Day 1 of each cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Akynzeo® capsules 5-HT3 RA corticosteroid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients aged ≥18 years
* Patients with a risk score of ≥ 13 as calculated by the algorithm - see 3.6.3.1. Baseline/screening: VISIT 0
* Signed Informed consent
* Both sexes
* Patients with diagnosis of any cancer scheduled and intended to be treated for three consecutive cycles with a single dose of any IV MEC regimen, per cycle, including adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
* Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2
* Use of Standard of Care defined as a 5-HT3 RA + Dexamethasone (or equivalent corticosteroid) based-regimen on day 1 of chemotherapy for CINV prevention
* Naïve and non- naïve to chemotherapy
* The enrolled women should be a) of non-childbearing potential or b) of childbearing potential using reliable contraceptive measures and having a negative urine pregnancy test done by health care team within 1-24 hours before dosing the antiemetic treatment in both arms and outcome recorded in the medical records
* Able to comply with study requirements

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (including anthracycline+cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy)
* Patients receiving oral moderately emetogenic chemotherapy drugs
* Patients receiving opioids within 2 weeks prior to trial enrollment (longer use allowed)
* Use of olanzapine as prophylaxis of CINV
* Patients scheduled to receive radiotherapy concurrently with chemotherapy
* Any illness or condition that, in the opinion of the physician, may confound the results of the study or pose unwarranted risks in administering the investigational product to the patient.
* Patients with mechanical risk factors for nausea (i.e. intestinal obstruction)
* Patients with liver disease (as nausea is a common presenting symptom)
* Patients with metabolic risk factors for nausea (i.e. electrolyte imbalances causing nausea/vomiting)
* Chronic treatment with steroids (with the exception of inhaled or topical steroids)
* Pregnancy and/or breast-feeding women
* Women of childbearing potential refusing to use effective contraception during the whole study treatment and up to one month after study treatment with Akynzeo®
* Use of Standard of Care including an NK-1 RA-based regimen to prevent CINV
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Helsinn Healthcare SA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alex Molasiotis, prof.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Derby

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shanghai Chest Hospital

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Shanghai Ninth People´s Hospital

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Shanghai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Thomayerova nemocnice

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

General University Hospital in Prague

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

München Klinik Neuperlach

München, , Germany

Site Status

Frauenklinik St. Louise

Paderborn, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann gemeinnützige GmbH

Potsdam, , Germany

Site Status

Sotiria General Hospital, 3rd Deúpartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

General University Hospital of Heraklion

Heraklion, , Greece

Site Status

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Salamanca

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

University Hospital Basel

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Swiss Medical Network - Clinique de Genolier

Genolier, , Switzerland

Site Status

The Royal Marsden Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China Czechia Germany Greece Spain Switzerland United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IBA1160

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.