Emergence Delirium in Children for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT ID: NCT04816344
Last Updated: 2021-04-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
140 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-07-01
2018-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect on the occurrence of emergence delirium, and recovery, of propofol and ketofol in paediatric patients undergoing diagnostic MRI following premedication with intranasal dexmedetomidine and midazolam.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Frequency of Adverse Events in Pediatric Patients Receiving Sedation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT06467045
Evaluation of Diagnoses and Clinical Outcomes in Children Undergoing MRI Scans
NCT06278376
Evaluation of Atelectasis Formation with Electrical Impedance Tomography During Anesthesia for MRI in Children
NCT04507581
The Rate of Full and Empty Stomach in Elective and Emergency Pediatric Patients
NCT04831593
The Utility of Performing Brain CT Scan in Non Trauma Patients at the Pediatric Emergency Unit
NCT00456391
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The patients were separated into four groups according to the anaesthetic agents given.Intranasal premedication was applied to all the patients, then an intravenous cannula was placed and the anaesthetic agents were administered intravenously. The Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) was used to evaluate the level of sedation, with a target of 5 points. The RSS is scored from 1-6 as follows: 1: the patient is worried and anxious, or restless, 2: the patient is calm and co-operative, and can be directed, 3: the patient only responds to instructions, 4: the patient responds rapidly to painful stimuli, 5: the patient demonstrates a slow response to painful stimuli, 6: the patient does not respond. When RSS 5 was reached following the first bolus dose of the drug, an additional dose was administered. When RSS 5 was obtained and hemodynamic stability was ensured, the patient was placed on the MRI table.
The patient was monitored in the recovery room for regaining consciousness for up to 30 mins after the procedure. AED was evaluated using the PAED scale by a nurse trained in the use of this scale. PAED scoring was repeated every 5 mins until the patient was discharged from the recovery room. If the PAED score was ≥10, a diagnosis of AED was made. Adverse events such as laryngospasm, desaturation (SpO2 \<95%), respiratory depression, bradycardia, allergy, hiccoughs, nystagmus, nausea, and vomiting were recorded. When a Modified Aldrete Score of \>9 was obtained, the child was observed for a further 15 mins then transferred from the recovery room.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group MP (n=35)
The patients were separated into four groups according to the anaesthetic agents given.
Premedication was applied as intranasal 0.2 mg/kg midazolam, then 1 mg/kg of propofol iv bolus as an anaesthetic agent was administered, and if necessary propofol 0.5 mg/kg iv was given as additional dosage.
Outpatient Anesthesia
The inclusion criteria were children aged between 2 and 10 years, undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for elective MRI under sedation, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II. The study exclusion criteria were defined as difficult airway, allergies to the study drugs, asthma, severe central nervous system disease (eg, brain tumour, uncontrolled seizures), mental motor retardation, the application of another procedure after MRI sedation, and those whose parents declined to participate in the study.
Group MK (n=35)
Premedication was applied as intranasal 0.2 mg/kg midazolam, then 1 mg/kg ketofol (10% ketamine + 10% propofol) iv bolus as an anaesthetic agent was administered, and if necessary 0.5 mg/kg iv ketofol was given as additional dosage.
Outpatient Anesthesia
The inclusion criteria were children aged between 2 and 10 years, undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for elective MRI under sedation, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II. The study exclusion criteria were defined as difficult airway, allergies to the study drugs, asthma, severe central nervous system disease (eg, brain tumour, uncontrolled seizures), mental motor retardation, the application of another procedure after MRI sedation, and those whose parents declined to participate in the study.
Group DP (n=35)
Premedication was applied as intranasal 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine, then 1 mg/kg of propofol iv bolus as an anaesthetic agent was administered, and if necessary propofol 0.5 mg/kg iv was given as additional dosage.
Outpatient Anesthesia
The inclusion criteria were children aged between 2 and 10 years, undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for elective MRI under sedation, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II. The study exclusion criteria were defined as difficult airway, allergies to the study drugs, asthma, severe central nervous system disease (eg, brain tumour, uncontrolled seizures), mental motor retardation, the application of another procedure after MRI sedation, and those whose parents declined to participate in the study.
Group DK (n=35)
Premedication was applied as intranasal 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine, then 1 mg/kg ketofol iv bolus as an anaesthetic agent was administered, and if necessary 0.5 mg/kg ketofol iv was given as an additional dosage.
Outpatient Anesthesia
The inclusion criteria were children aged between 2 and 10 years, undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for elective MRI under sedation, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II. The study exclusion criteria were defined as difficult airway, allergies to the study drugs, asthma, severe central nervous system disease (eg, brain tumour, uncontrolled seizures), mental motor retardation, the application of another procedure after MRI sedation, and those whose parents declined to participate in the study.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Outpatient Anesthesia
The inclusion criteria were children aged between 2 and 10 years, undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for elective MRI under sedation, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II. The study exclusion criteria were defined as difficult airway, allergies to the study drugs, asthma, severe central nervous system disease (eg, brain tumour, uncontrolled seizures), mental motor retardation, the application of another procedure after MRI sedation, and those whose parents declined to participate in the study.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for elective MRI under sedation,
* classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II.
Exclusion Criteria
* allergies to the study drugs,
* asthma,
* severe central nervous system disease (eg, brain tumour, uncontrolled seizures),
* mental motor retardation,
* the application of another procedure after MRI sedation,
* whose parents declined to participate in the study.
2 Years
10 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Derya Karasu, MD
Assoc Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Derya Karasu
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Health Sciences Turkey, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital
Bursa, Yıldırım, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1265-0994
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.