Emergence Delirium in Children for Magnetic Resonance Imaging

NCT ID: NCT04816344

Last Updated: 2021-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

140 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2018-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sedation or anaesthesia is necessary to be able to perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on children who cannot keep still or are uncooperative, and thus the targets of maximum patient safety, successful imaging, and the highest imaging quality can be achieved. There are various drugs for sedation in MRI. A child with Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (AED) has a state of consciousness which can be described as "irritable, uncompromising, inconsistent, crying inconsistently, wailing, and kicking". The incidence of AED worldwide has been reported to vary between 18% and 80%, depending on the diagnostic criteria used. This difference can usually be explained by the use of different scales and defining criteria. In 2004, Sikich and Lerman developed the Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, including cognitive evaluation components in addition to agitation behaviours, and the validity and reliability of this scale have been proven. In a study of anaesthesia early delirium in children by Bong et al.7 a score of ≥10 on the PAED scale was shown to have the greatest sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of anaesthesia early delirium.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect on the occurrence of emergence delirium, and recovery, of propofol and ketofol in paediatric patients undergoing diagnostic MRI following premedication with intranasal dexmedetomidine and midazolam.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a prospective, observational, and single-center study conducted between July-November 2018. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the parent.

The patients were separated into four groups according to the anaesthetic agents given.Intranasal premedication was applied to all the patients, then an intravenous cannula was placed and the anaesthetic agents were administered intravenously. The Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) was used to evaluate the level of sedation, with a target of 5 points. The RSS is scored from 1-6 as follows: 1: the patient is worried and anxious, or restless, 2: the patient is calm and co-operative, and can be directed, 3: the patient only responds to instructions, 4: the patient responds rapidly to painful stimuli, 5: the patient demonstrates a slow response to painful stimuli, 6: the patient does not respond. When RSS 5 was reached following the first bolus dose of the drug, an additional dose was administered. When RSS 5 was obtained and hemodynamic stability was ensured, the patient was placed on the MRI table.

The patient was monitored in the recovery room for regaining consciousness for up to 30 mins after the procedure. AED was evaluated using the PAED scale by a nurse trained in the use of this scale. PAED scoring was repeated every 5 mins until the patient was discharged from the recovery room. If the PAED score was ≥10, a diagnosis of AED was made. Adverse events such as laryngospasm, desaturation (SpO2 \<95%), respiratory depression, bradycardia, allergy, hiccoughs, nystagmus, nausea, and vomiting were recorded. When a Modified Aldrete Score of \>9 was obtained, the child was observed for a further 15 mins then transferred from the recovery room.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Delirium Pediatric Disorder Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group MP (n=35)

The patients were separated into four groups according to the anaesthetic agents given.

Premedication was applied as intranasal 0.2 mg/kg midazolam, then 1 mg/kg of propofol iv bolus as an anaesthetic agent was administered, and if necessary propofol 0.5 mg/kg iv was given as additional dosage.

Outpatient Anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The inclusion criteria were children aged between 2 and 10 years, undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for elective MRI under sedation, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II. The study exclusion criteria were defined as difficult airway, allergies to the study drugs, asthma, severe central nervous system disease (eg, brain tumour, uncontrolled seizures), mental motor retardation, the application of another procedure after MRI sedation, and those whose parents declined to participate in the study.

Group MK (n=35)

Premedication was applied as intranasal 0.2 mg/kg midazolam, then 1 mg/kg ketofol (10% ketamine + 10% propofol) iv bolus as an anaesthetic agent was administered, and if necessary 0.5 mg/kg iv ketofol was given as additional dosage.

Outpatient Anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The inclusion criteria were children aged between 2 and 10 years, undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for elective MRI under sedation, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II. The study exclusion criteria were defined as difficult airway, allergies to the study drugs, asthma, severe central nervous system disease (eg, brain tumour, uncontrolled seizures), mental motor retardation, the application of another procedure after MRI sedation, and those whose parents declined to participate in the study.

Group DP (n=35)

Premedication was applied as intranasal 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine, then 1 mg/kg of propofol iv bolus as an anaesthetic agent was administered, and if necessary propofol 0.5 mg/kg iv was given as additional dosage.

Outpatient Anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The inclusion criteria were children aged between 2 and 10 years, undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for elective MRI under sedation, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II. The study exclusion criteria were defined as difficult airway, allergies to the study drugs, asthma, severe central nervous system disease (eg, brain tumour, uncontrolled seizures), mental motor retardation, the application of another procedure after MRI sedation, and those whose parents declined to participate in the study.

Group DK (n=35)

Premedication was applied as intranasal 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine, then 1 mg/kg ketofol iv bolus as an anaesthetic agent was administered, and if necessary 0.5 mg/kg ketofol iv was given as an additional dosage.

Outpatient Anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The inclusion criteria were children aged between 2 and 10 years, undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for elective MRI under sedation, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II. The study exclusion criteria were defined as difficult airway, allergies to the study drugs, asthma, severe central nervous system disease (eg, brain tumour, uncontrolled seizures), mental motor retardation, the application of another procedure after MRI sedation, and those whose parents declined to participate in the study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Outpatient Anesthesia

The inclusion criteria were children aged between 2 and 10 years, undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for elective MRI under sedation, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II. The study exclusion criteria were defined as difficult airway, allergies to the study drugs, asthma, severe central nervous system disease (eg, brain tumour, uncontrolled seizures), mental motor retardation, the application of another procedure after MRI sedation, and those whose parents declined to participate in the study.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* children aged between 2 and 10 years,
* undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for elective MRI under sedation,
* classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II.

Exclusion Criteria

* difficult airway,
* allergies to the study drugs,
* asthma,
* severe central nervous system disease (eg, brain tumour, uncontrolled seizures),
* mental motor retardation,
* the application of another procedure after MRI sedation,
* whose parents declined to participate in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

10 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Derya Karasu, MD

Assoc Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Derya Karasu

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Health Sciences Turkey, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital

Bursa, Yıldırım, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1265-0994

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effectiveness of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
NCT03473249 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4