NanaBis™ an Oro-buccal Administered delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (d9-THC) & Cannabidiol (CBD) Medicine for the Management of Bone Pain From Metastatic Cancers

NCT ID: NCT04808531

Last Updated: 2022-04-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

360 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-30

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multi-centre, long term, double blind, clinical protocol for NanaBis™ as a monotherapy treatment in participants 18-75 years of age with cancer related pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This trial uses an alternative method to demonstrate the analgesic efficacy of NanaBis™ as a monotherapy in cancer participants. Proving analgesic efficacy requires demonstrating that (i) the analgesic is significantly better than placebo and (ii) that the magnitude of the improvement is clinically important. The latter is standardly done by measuring the change in pain levels from a baseline (no analgesia) to the end of a treatment period. A 30% decrease in the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) has been correlated with participants reporting a moderate improvement in their pain and this was adopted as the standard method of demonstrating a clinically important magnitude of improvement. In this strategy, the measure of analgesic efficacy is the proportion of participants in the treatment group whose pain is adequately treated (responders). A responder is defined as a patient who completes the treatment phase with an acceptable level of pain (NPRS ≤ 5) and without requiring excessive amounts of rescue (breakthrough analgesia) medication. Unlimited breakthrough analgesia (Oxycodone) is allowed throughout the study; however, excessive use will result in discontinuation. Comparison of the proportion of responders in the NanaBis™ arm and placebo arms will determine if NanaBis™ is significantly better than placebo. Demonstrating that the proportion of responders in the NanaBis™ arm is non-inferior to the Oxycodone controlled release (CR) comparator arm will determine if the magnitude of improvement (provided by NanaBis™) is clinically important because Oxycodone CR has been established as the benchmark analgesic that provides a clinically important effect.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer Related Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Quadruple blinding

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Double Placebo Arm

Spray Placebo + Tablet Placebo

Spray Placebo is a nanoparticle water soluble solution without cannabinoids containing a small amount of hemp seed oil (for fragrance purposes only) as defined by Australian Office of Drug Control (ODC) (https://www.odc.gov.au/hemp-products). One dose is equivalent to 2 actuations of the pump delivering 280 µL volume.

Tablet Placebo will be identical to the Oxycontin tablets.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo Spray

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo comparator used against both NanaBis™ and Oxycodone depending on randomisation of arms.

Placebo Tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo comparator used against both NanaBis™ and Oxycodone depending on randomisation of arms.

Oxycodone IR

Intervention Type DRUG

Oxycodone immediate release (IR) tablet or capsule or oral solution used as breakthrough analgesia.

Treatment NanaBis™ Arm

NanaBis™ + Tablet Placebo

NanaBis™ is a nanoparticle water soluble equimolar solution of d9-THC and CBD. One dose is equivalent to 2 actuations of the pump delivering 280 µL volume containing 2.5 mg d9-THC and 2.5 mg CBD. The dose administered will be 1 - 3.5 doses (2 sprays to 7 sprays) per 4 hours unless asleep.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NanaBis™

Intervention Type DRUG

NanaBis™ is a nanoparticle water soluble equimolar solution of d9-THC \& CBD. One dose is equivalent to 2 actuations of the pump delivering 280 µL volume containing 2.5 mg d9-THC and 2.5 mg CBD

Placebo Tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo comparator used against both NanaBis™ and Oxycodone depending on randomisation of arms.

Oxycodone IR

Intervention Type DRUG

Oxycodone immediate release (IR) tablet or capsule or oral solution used as breakthrough analgesia.

Comparator (Oxycodone) Arm

Spray Placebo + Oxycodone CR

Spray Placebo is a nanoparticle water soluble solution without cannabinoids containing a small amount of hemp seed oil (for fragrance purposes only) as defined by Australian ODC (https://www.odc.gov.au/hemp-products). One dose is equivalent to 2 actuations of the pump delivering 280 µL volume.

Oxycodone controlled release (CR) used as a comparator will be Oxycontin tablets 10 mg - 70 mg po bd.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oxycodone CR

Intervention Type DRUG

Oxycodone CR tablet is an opioid agonist supplied in 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg,40 mg, 60 mg and 80 mg tablets for oral administration. The tablet strengths describe the amount of oxycodone per tablet as the hydrochloride salt.

Placebo Spray

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo comparator used against both NanaBis™ and Oxycodone depending on randomisation of arms.

Oxycodone IR

Intervention Type DRUG

Oxycodone immediate release (IR) tablet or capsule or oral solution used as breakthrough analgesia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NanaBis™

NanaBis™ is a nanoparticle water soluble equimolar solution of d9-THC \& CBD. One dose is equivalent to 2 actuations of the pump delivering 280 µL volume containing 2.5 mg d9-THC and 2.5 mg CBD

Intervention Type DRUG

Oxycodone CR

Oxycodone CR tablet is an opioid agonist supplied in 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg,40 mg, 60 mg and 80 mg tablets for oral administration. The tablet strengths describe the amount of oxycodone per tablet as the hydrochloride salt.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Spray

Placebo comparator used against both NanaBis™ and Oxycodone depending on randomisation of arms.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Tablet

Placebo comparator used against both NanaBis™ and Oxycodone depending on randomisation of arms.

Intervention Type DRUG

Oxycodone IR

Oxycodone immediate release (IR) tablet or capsule or oral solution used as breakthrough analgesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MDCNB-01 NanoCelle® d9-THC & CBD OxyNorm® OxyContin® Endone® Proladone® Targin® Xtampza ER® NanoCelle® Placebo Spray Oxyfast® Oxy IR® Oxaydo® Roxicodone®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

At Screening Phase

Participants must fulfil all of the following criteria:

* Prospective male and female participants that are:

1. in the age range 18-65 years or
2. 65 to 75 years without significant co-morbidities (heart, lung, liver or renal failure, myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, connective tissue disease or diabetes mellitus with end-organ damage)
* Metastatic bone pain from a cancer diagnosis is the only major cause of pain.
* Documented proof (imaging) confirming the Metastatic Bone Disease at the current site of pain and that there has no been treatment since diagnosis
* Meet International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for pain management criteria (i.e., bone cancer pain)
* During the screening period, the participant is on stable opioid pain management and pain severity (NPRS) ≤ 8 with a maximum variation of ± 1
* Pain Detect score \> 18
* Participant willing and able to provide informed consent and follow study procedures

1. including agreeing to not drive or operate heavy machinery; and
2. females of child-bearing potential agree to use reliable contraception during the duration of the clinical trial
* Patient deemed tolerable to Oxycodone and NanaBis™ determined by medical history of allergies to cannabinoids or opioids
* Patient must not be a participant in a clinical trial or study.

Exclusion Criteria

At Screening Phase

Participants will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria that include:

* History of epilepsy or recurrent seizures
* Moderate to severe medical conditions such as

1. Severe hepatic, cardiovascular, pulmonary or renal impairment or
2. Psychiatric disorders (i.e., unstable schizophrenia, recent drug-induced psychosis, severe mood disorders), that would be assessed at the medical screen
* If participants have been diagnosed with a current substance abuse disorder
* Women who are pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant
* Identified concerns by the nursing / medical team relevant to the safe storage of medications (i.e., NanaBis™ or standard medical therapy)
* Participants who may not be available for follow up (i.e., planned or expected travel or other)
* Participants plan to undergo any treatment that will substantially reduce the burden of disease (and therefore bone pain) during the screening, titration or maintenance phase of the clinical trial such as radiotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy
* Participants who are unable to withhold all analgesia (apart from which is part of this trial) during the titration and maintenance phase of the study, including bisphosphonates, or are currently exceeding equivalence of 70mg BD Oxycodone CR. Medications such as bisphosphonates may be coordinated so they are given either side of the excluded period that covers the titration and maintenance phases
* Participants will NOT be excluded if they are being treated with maintenance pharmacotherapy to prevent progression of disease such as steroids and hormone therapy, which may be continued during the trial at a stable dose
* Participant will be excluded if they are participating in any other clinical trial or study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Emerald Clinical Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

WriteSource Medical Pty Ltd

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medlab Clinical

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Prof. Luis Vitetta

Role: CONTACT

+61 8188 0311 ext. 106

Dr. Michael Lyon

Role: CONTACT

+1 604 777 5500

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11690728 (View on PubMed)

Kress HG, Koch ED, Kosturski H, Steup A, Karcher K, Lange B, Dogan C, Etropolski MS, Eerdekens M. Tapentadol prolonged release for managing moderate to severe, chronic malignant tumor-related pain. Pain Physician. 2014 Jul-Aug;17(4):329-43.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25054392 (View on PubMed)

Anderson W. 2007 National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Intern Med J. 2011 Jul;41(7):581-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02528.x. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21762341 (View on PubMed)

Portenoy RK. Treatment of cancer pain. Lancet. 2011 Jun 25;377(9784):2236-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60236-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21704873 (View on PubMed)

Deandrea S, Montanari M, Moja L, Apolone G. Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain. A review of published literature. Ann Oncol. 2008 Dec;19(12):1985-91. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn419. Epub 2008 Jul 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18632721 (View on PubMed)

Wiffen PJ, McQuay HJ. Oral morphine for cancer pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD003868. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003868.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17943804 (View on PubMed)

Kane CM, Hoskin P, Bennett MI. Cancer induced bone pain. BMJ. 2015 Jan 29;350:h315. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h315. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25633978 (View on PubMed)

Gregorian RS Jr, Gasik A, Kwong WJ, Voeller S, Kavanagh S. Importance of side effects in opioid treatment: a trade-off analysis with patients and physicians. J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1095-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20452835 (View on PubMed)

Macedo F, Ladeira K, Pinho F, Saraiva N, Bonito N, Pinto L, Goncalves F. Bone Metastases: An Overview. Oncol Rev. 2017 May 9;11(1):321. doi: 10.4081/oncol.2017.321. eCollection 2017 Mar 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28584570 (View on PubMed)

Choong PF. The molecular basis of skeletal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Oct;(415 Suppl):S19-31. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093839.72468.da.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14600589 (View on PubMed)

Pezaro C, Omlin A, Lorente D, Rodrigues DN, Ferraldeschi R, Bianchini D, Mukherji D, Riisnaes R, Altavilla A, Crespo M, Tunariu N, de Bono J, Attard G. Visceral disease in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):270-273. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.055. Epub 2013 Nov 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24295792 (View on PubMed)

Bubendorf L, Schopfer A, Wagner U, Sauter G, Moch H, Willi N, Gasser TC, Mihatsch MJ. Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1,589 patients. Hum Pathol. 2000 May;31(5):578-83. doi: 10.1053/hp.2000.6698.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10836297 (View on PubMed)

Yanae M, Fujimoto S, Tane K, Tanioka M, Fujiwara K, Tsubaki M, Yamazoe Y, Morishima Y, Chiba Y, Takao S, Komoike Y, Tsurutani J, Nakagawa K, Nishida S. Increased risk of SSEs in bone-only metastatic breast cancer patients treated with zoledronic acid. J Bone Oncol. 2017 Aug 31;8:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2017.08.004. eCollection 2017 Sep.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28884071 (View on PubMed)

Body JJ, Quinn G, Talbot S, Booth E, Demonty G, Taylor A, Amelio J. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the proportion of patients with breast cancer who develop bone metastases. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017 Jul;115:67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28602171 (View on PubMed)

Coleman RE. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 15;12(20 Pt 2):6243s-6249s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0931.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17062708 (View on PubMed)

Colloca L, Ludman T, Bouhassira D, Baron R, Dickenson AH, Yarnitsky D, Freeman R, Truini A, Attal N, Finnerup NB, Eccleston C, Kalso E, Bennett DL, Dworkin RH, Raja SN. Neuropathic pain. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Feb 16;3:17002. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28205574 (View on PubMed)

Murnion BP. Neuropathic pain: current definition and review of drug treatment. Aust Prescr. 2018 Jun;41(3):60-63. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2018.022. Epub 2018 Jun 1. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29921999 (View on PubMed)

Mantyh PW. Bone cancer pain: from mechanism to therapy. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2014 Jun;8(2):83-90. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000048.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24792411 (View on PubMed)

Ahmad I, Ahmed MM, Ahsraf MF, Naeem A, Tasleem A, Ahmed M, Farooqi MS. Pain Management in Metastatic Bone Disease: A Literature Review. Cureus. 2018 Sep 11;10(9):e3286. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3286.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30443456 (View on PubMed)

Meng H, Johnston B, Englesakis M, Moulin DE, Bhatia A. Selective Cannabinoids for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1638-1652. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002110.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28537982 (View on PubMed)

Cavalli E, Mammana S, Nicoletti F, Bramanti P, Mazzon E. The neuropathic pain: An overview of the current treatment and future therapeutic approaches. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2019 Jan-Dec;33:2058738419838383. doi: 10.1177/2058738419838383.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30900486 (View on PubMed)

Lee-Kubli CA, Calcutt NA. Painful neuropathy: Mechanisms. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;126:533-57. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53480-4.00034-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25410243 (View on PubMed)

Deshpande A, Mailis-Gagnon A, Zoheiry N, Lakha SF. Efficacy and adverse effects of medical marijuana for chronic noncancer pain: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Can Fam Physician. 2015 Aug;61(8):e372-81.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26505059 (View on PubMed)

Blake A, Wan BA, Malek L, DeAngelis C, Diaz P, Lao N, Chow E, O'Hearn S. A selective review of medical cannabis in cancer pain management. Ann Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;6(Suppl 2):S215-S222. doi: 10.21037/apm.2017.08.05. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28866904 (View on PubMed)

Ligresti A, De Petrocellis L, Di Marzo V. From Phytocannabinoids to Cannabinoid Receptors and Endocannabinoids: Pleiotropic Physiological and Pathological Roles Through Complex Pharmacology. Physiol Rev. 2016 Oct;96(4):1593-659. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00002.2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27630175 (View on PubMed)

Sun J, Zhou YQ, Chen SP, Wang XM, Xu BY, Li DY, Tian YK, Ye DW. The endocannabinoid system: Novel targets for treating cancer induced bone pain. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Dec;120:109504. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109504. Epub 2019 Oct 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31627091 (View on PubMed)

Mao Y, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Wang C, Wu H, Tian X, Liu Y, Hou B, Liang Y, Rong H, Gu X, Ma Z. Cannabinoid receptor 2-selective agonist JWH015 attenuates bone cancer pain through the amelioration of impaired autophagy flux induced by inflammatory mediators in the spinal cord. Mol Med Rep. 2019 Dec;20(6):5100-5110. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10772. Epub 2019 Oct 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31661120 (View on PubMed)

Boland EG, Bennett MI, Allgar V, Boland JW. Cannabinoids for adult cancer-related pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Mar;10(1):14-24. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002032. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31959586 (View on PubMed)

Imanaka K, Tominaga Y, Etropolski M, Ohashi H, Hirose K, Matsumura T. Ready conversion of patients with well-controlled, moderate to severe, chronic malignant tumor-related pain on other opioids to tapentadol extended release. Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Jul;34(7):501-11. doi: 10.1007/s40261-014-0204-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24906437 (View on PubMed)

Freynhagen R, Baron R, Gockel U, Tolle TR. painDETECT: a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Oct;22(10):1911-20. doi: 10.1185/030079906X132488.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17022849 (View on PubMed)

Freynhagen R, Baron R, Tolle T, Stemmler E, Gockel U, Stevens M, Maier C. Screening of neuropathic pain components in patients with chronic back pain associated with nerve root compression: a prospective observational pilot study (MIPORT). Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Mar;22(3):529-37. doi: 10.1185/030079906X89874.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16574036 (View on PubMed)

Lee SH, Min YS, Park HY, Jung TD. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients with lymphedema who survived more than one year after surgery. J Breast Cancer. 2012 Dec;15(4):449-53. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.449. Epub 2012 Dec 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23346175 (View on PubMed)

Rehberg B, Mathivon S, Combescure C, Mercier Y, Savoldelli GL. Prediction of Acute Postoperative Pain Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire: A Cohort Study. Clin J Pain. 2017 Jan;33(1):57-66. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000380.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27922844 (View on PubMed)

Handelsman L, Cochrane KJ, Aronson MJ, Ness R, Rubinstein KJ, Kanof PD. Two new rating scales for opiate withdrawal. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1987;13(3):293-308. doi: 10.3109/00952998709001515.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3687892 (View on PubMed)

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2011;9(8):672-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 13. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22019563 (View on PubMed)

Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, Hrobjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Dore CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WS, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23295957 (View on PubMed)

Pain: clinical manual for nursing practice Pain: clinical manual for nursing practice Margo McCaffery Alexander Beebe Mosby Yearbook UK pound17.25 0 7234 1992 2. Nurs Stand. 1994 Dec 7;9(11):55. doi: 10.7748/ns.9.11.55.s69.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27527475 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/ich37795.pdf

Note for Guidance on Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting (CPMP/ICH/377/95). Annotated with TGA comments,. 2001.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK476449/

VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Reports. In Benefits and Harms of Cannabis in Chronic Pain or Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review, Department of Veterans Affairs (US): Washington (DC), 2017.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MDC-NB-P3-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cannabis Versus Oxycodone for Pain Relief
NCT02892591 COMPLETED PHASE3
Cannabidiol, Morphine, Pain
NCT04030442 RECRUITING PHASE1