Neurovegetative Decoupling in Somatoform Disorders : Biofeedback Interest

NCT ID: NCT04807933

Last Updated: 2024-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-16

Study Completion Date

2023-09-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Evaluation of the physiological and clinical effects of the biofeedback training with patients suffering from somatoform disorders, depending on their neurovegetative profile related to a visceral-brain decoupling.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Somatoform disorders \[SD\] are defined as physiological function or organ disturbances unexplained by a specific diagnosis criterion. Some approaches have recently defended the idea of common factors of vulnerability behind the large variability of the clinical symptoms regarding the SD. In this context, the lead of the neurovegetative disturbances started receiving attention following some studies that suggested the autonomic nervous system \[ANS\] disturbances concerning a somatoform disorder, independently of its form. Two different neurovegetative endophenotypes (individual autonomic profiles) were highlighted: a functional neurovegetative profile (high vagal tone) and a dysfunctional neurovegetative profile (low vagal tone).

A dysfunctional neurovegetative profile could be accompanied by a chronic decoupling in the brain-visceral axis according as the ANS is considered as a bidirectional communication system linked the central nervous system \[CNS\] and the viscera. Depending on the types of the neurovegetative profiles, different degrees of cognitive-emotional vulnerability and a higher or a lower level of acceptance of the illness could be supposed. Finally, recent findings defend the idea of the traumatic experiences as a determining factor to develop a SD.

In accordance to the last notions regarding the SD, some therapeutic approaches could be interesting specifically techniques focusing on the vagal nerve. In this context, biofeedback \[BFB\] could provide a powerful method to restore the clinical and physiological impairments.

As a consequence, the main objective is to evaluate the physiological and clinical effects of the BFB training with patients suffering from SD: Irritable Bowel Syndrome \[IBS\] or Psychogenic Non Epileptic Seizure \[PNES\]. The investigators make the prediction that the patients will be more or less responding to the biofeedback depending on their neurovegetative profile. A clustering will be performed in advance to identify the patients having a dysfunctional neurovegetative profile and patients having a functional neurovegetative profile. It will also permit to the investigators to confirm the hypothesis about the existence of two neurovegetative profiles related to a visceral-brain decoupling concerning the SD, independently of its form. To attest to it, 2 types of somatoform disorders will be analyzed: the irritable bowel syndrome manifesting by peripheral symptoms and the psychogenic non-epileptic seizures manifesting by central symptoms. Then the investigators will carry out a psycho-social exploration to demonstrate a higher cognitive-emotional vulnerability and a higher traumatic event incidence in this particular population, depending on their autonomic profiles.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Somatoform Disorders Irritable Bowel Syndrome Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizure

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Autonomic nervous system Brain-gut axis Endophenotype Cognitive-emotional vulnerability Traumas Biofeedback Heart rate variability Vagal tone Central nervous system Enteric nervous system Early life events Somatoform disorders Stress Irritable bowel syndrome Psychogenic non epileptic seizures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The study requires 3 sessions (T1 / T2 / T3) with at least 24 days between each. The period (24 days) between the first session and the second session (T1-T2) will be considered as the control period. During the period, the participants will practice none exercise. The period (24 days) between the second session and the third session (T2-T3) will be considered as the intervention period. At the end of the second session (T2), the participants will be separated into two inter-subject groups: an experimental group performing BFB technique (3X5 min per day) in the intervention period (T2-T3) and a control group not performing a specific exercise in the intervention period (T2-T3).
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The participants won't be informed of the condition to which they belong. A debriefing will be done at the end of the last session (T3) for each participant.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental group (BFB training)

The participants assigned to the experimental group will do the biofeedback training using the Emwave software during the intervention period (T2-T3). The biofeedback software (Emwave Pro®) includes a photoplethysmography sensor that can be positioned on the earlobe. The installation of the program and the explanations needed for using it, will be done during the second session (T2). According to the guidelines, a fractional training is proposed 5 minutes, 3 times a day for 24 days (T2-T3).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Heart rate variability Biofeedback [HRV-BFB]

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

BFB consists of a physiological recording used as a visual physiological feedback that can teach us how to control our physiology, which is naturally unconscious and uncontrollable. The BFB focused on the heart rate variability (HRV-BFB) could regulate the autonomic nervous system (vagal tone and sympathetic-parasympathetic balance) and the emotional state. The HRV BFB has received several clinical and experimental confirmations as a physiological remediation method. It is an innovative and non-pharmacological therapy frequently used to relieve stress.

Control group (no BFB training)

The participants assigned to the experimental group will not do a specific exercise during the intervention period (T2-T3).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Heart rate variability Biofeedback [HRV-BFB]

BFB consists of a physiological recording used as a visual physiological feedback that can teach us how to control our physiology, which is naturally unconscious and uncontrollable. The BFB focused on the heart rate variability (HRV-BFB) could regulate the autonomic nervous system (vagal tone and sympathetic-parasympathetic balance) and the emotional state. The HRV BFB has received several clinical and experimental confirmations as a physiological remediation method. It is an innovative and non-pharmacological therapy frequently used to relieve stress.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Complementary technique

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Somatoform disorders (IBS or PNES) diagnosis must be established by the partner doctors
* Participants must have home computer
* Participants must be of the age of majority
* Participants must be registered for social security
* Participants must have signed an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Specially protected participants (under clauses L1121-5 and L1121-8 by the code of public health): juveniles, pregnant womens, nursing mothers, law's protection peoples
* Participants suffering from a severe psychiatric disease needing specialised attention
* Participants suffering from or have suffered from a severe disease causing autonomic dysfunctions (heart failure, asthma, blood disease, renal failure, peripheral neuropathy, vagotomy, thyroid disorder, alcoholism, liver disease, amyloidosis)
* Participants taking medication which could be impact autonomic nervous system activity (anticholinergic, antiarrhythmics, clonidine, beta-blockers, tricyclic anti-depressants, metronidazole)
* Participants placing under judicial or administrative supervisions
* Participants were compensated more than 4500 euros because of his research protocol participation concerning human over the 12 months prior to the actual study
* Participants being not be able to contact in emergency
* Participants being in an exclusion period from another study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Laboratoire interuniversitaire de psychologie - LIP-PC2S

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Grenoble

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Essaiclinique_BIOFEESOMATO

Pr. Bruno Bonaz

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bruno BONAZ, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Grenoble

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital, Grenoble Alpes

Grenoble, Isère, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8598068 (View on PubMed)

Laborde S, Mosley E, Thayer JF. Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research - Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting. Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 20;8:213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00213. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28265249 (View on PubMed)

Muller L, Spitz E. [Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population]. Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18. French.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15029085 (View on PubMed)

Mehling WE, Acree M, Stewart A, Silas J, Jones A. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2). PLoS One. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):e0208034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208034. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30513087 (View on PubMed)

Varon C, Morales J, Lazaro J, Orini M, Deviaene M, Kontaxis S, Testelmans D, Buyse B, Borzee P, Sornmo L, Laguna P, Gil E, Bailon R. A Comparative Study of ECG-derived Respiration in Ambulatory Monitoring using the Single-lead ECG. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 31;10(1):5704. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62624-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32235865 (View on PubMed)

de Vroege L, Emons WHM, Sijtsma K, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM. Psychometric Properties of the Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire (BVAQ) in the General Population and a Clinical Population. Front Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 23;9:111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00111. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29740350 (View on PubMed)

Bulut NS, Wurz A, Yorguner Kupeli N, Carkaxhiu Bulut G, Sungur MZ. Heart rate variability response to affective pictures processed in and outside of conscious awareness: Three consecutive studies on emotional regulation. Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Jul;129:18-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29787784 (View on PubMed)

Schumann A, Kohler S, Brotte L, Bar KJ. Effect of an eight-week smartphone-guided HRV-biofeedback intervention on autonomic function and impulsivity in healthy controls. Physiol Meas. 2019 Jul 1;40(6):064001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab2065.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31071705 (View on PubMed)

Sarason IG, Johnson JH, Siegel JM. Assessing the impact of life changes: development of the Life Experiences Survey. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1978 Oct;46(5):932-46. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.46.5.932. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 701572 (View on PubMed)

Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3397865 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00033-7

Vorst, Harrie C.M, et Bob Bermond. " Validity and Reliability of the Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire ". Personality and Individual Differences 30, no 3 (février 2001): 413 34.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2005.02.002

Plaisant O, Srivastava S, Mendelsohn GA, Debray Q, John OP. Relations entre le Big Five Inventory franc¸ais et le manuel diagnostique des troubles mentaux dans un échantillon clinique franc¸ais. Ann Med Psychol 2005;163:161-7.

https://conservancy.umn.edu/items/38cff7f5-eb7a-4578-9a45-483e0bf5e697

Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self report depression scalefor research in the general population. App Psycho Meas1977;1:384-401.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-A02155-34

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id