Feasibility of Implementation of Recommended Standards in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT ID: NCT04806048
Last Updated: 2024-04-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
581 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-06-01
2022-10-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Heart Failure Events Reduction With Remote Monitoring and eHealth Support Investigator Initiated Trial
NCT03663907
Development of Clinical Prediction Rules and Health Services Research in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT03512704
Heart Failure Patients Registry
NCT04709263
Predictive Models of Readmission in Heart Failure
NCT03300791
Observational Study on the Patient's Ability to Use a Digital Platform in Heart Failure
NCT06869408
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. SPECIFIC GOALS To identify factors that hinder the use and applicability of this group of standards in real life, where appropriate, defined as the variables not filled in and the reason for the absence of such information To estimate the workload necessary to implement this set of variables within everyday clinical practice.
3. STUDY DESIGN Observational pilot study with prospective follow-up with data collection at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year.
Due to the defined objective, the methods used are, to a large extent, those proposed by ICHOM, except in those sections that may be slightly modified to adapt to the local situation.
3.1. Selection of centers and patients Six centers with experience and adequate organization (heart failure unit) and with a sufficient size have been selected to guarantee the recruitment of patients in a short period of time (around three weeks). The main justification was to seek, within the usual clinical practice, centers where, due to the organization and interest in heart failure, the chances of success of this initiative were greater.
100 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of heart failure who meet inclusion criteria and with no exclusion criteria will be selected in each center.
3.2. Sample size considerations For the main outcome, success is considered if the proportion of patients followed is ≥ 70%. A random sample of 588 individuals is sufficient to estimate, with 95% confidence and a precision of +/- 3.5 percentage units, a population percentage that is expected to be around 75%. Six Spanish centers will participate and a recruitment target of 100 consecutive patients is set, for a total of 600 patients in the study. In addition, these sizes in each center offer, accepting an alpha risk of 0.05, a power greater than 80% to detect statistically significant differences between two centers, assuming that a follow-up of 75% of patients is achieved in one and 55% in the other.
3.3. Follow-up From the baseline or inclusion visit and afterwards, in newly diagnosed patients or in those recruited in an acute situation, follow-up visits at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year \[Hospitalized patients (1. A recent diagnosis, that is, they did not previously have the diagnosis of HF and 2.Patients with a previous diagnosis of HF and who are admitted for an episode of decompensation of HF) and Outpatients (1. A recent diagnosis that is in the process of titration and/or compensation and 2.A previous diagnosis, that they have suffered a decompensation, either defined because they have had to go to the emergency room or have been seen in the outpatient clinic for that reason)\].
In patients who were included in a stable situation, the 30-day visit will not be carried out (Outpatients: "Stable" patients attending a follow-up visit. A simple follow-up) since doing so would unjustifiably complicate the follow-up, giving more work and discomfort to patients and health professionals. The outcomes reported by the patient (PROMs) in the visits every six months may be collected by telephone contact if the doctor, due to the stable situation of the patient, does not consider the face-to-face visit necessary. Information will be collected at in the case of hospital admissions during follow-up, these admissions also set the "counter to zero" with regard to time for the following visits (30 days, six months…).
4\. DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT A data entry application will be enabled that will include filters to detect inconsistencies and anomalous data and alarms for patient monitoring. The data will be anonymized for all the people involved in the study except for the person in charge in each center, who will be able to identify their patients to enable follow-up.
5\. PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS Two data analyses are planned, one that includes the information from the baseline visit and the 30-day visit (in patients for whom it is indicated in the protocol) and the final one with all the information collected. In both cases, a global analysis and a comparison between centers (benchmarking) will be carried out.
In line with the main objective of this pilot study, the main variables are the proportion of patients who remain in follow-up, the proportion of patients in whom follow-up is carried out, in terms of time, as planned, and the proportion of missing data in each one of the defined outcomes.
The pilot's success criteria will be a follow-up\> 70%, a proportion of missing data in the outcomes \<10%.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hospitalized patients and outpatients
There may be different types of patients with differing follow-up plan but all will bie considered one group regarding on whether they receive their recommended follow-up plan
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed with heart failure: Clinical identification of signs and symptoms of heart failure and objective evidence of heart dysfunction.
* Acute presentation (first presentation or decompensation of already known HF, whether or not it causes hospital admission) or chronic (stable outpatients) of any etiology
* Any value of the ejection fraction.
* Give writed informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Heart transplant patients
* Patients with long-lasting ventricular assist devices
* Patients with isolated right heart failure.
* Patients with onset of heart failure and whose cause can be corrected immediately (eg, acute ischemia).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
ODDS , S.L.
UNKNOWN
Vifor Pharma España, S.L.
UNKNOWN
Fundacion Profesor Novoa Santos
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marisa Crespo Leiro
Head of Heart Failure Unit
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
María G Crespo Leiro, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, Spain
Hospital Universitario Basurto
Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain
Hospital Universitario de A Coruña
A Coruña, , Spain
Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga, , Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Groenewegen A, Rutten FH, Mosterd A, Hoes AW. Epidemiology of heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;22(8):1342-1356. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1858. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
Anguita Sanchez M, Crespo Leiro MG, de Teresa Galvan E, Jimenez Navarro M, Alonso-Pulpon L, Muniz Garcia J; PRICE Study Investigators. Prevalence of heart failure in the Spanish general population aged over 45 years. The PRICE Study. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 Oct;61(10):1041-9. doi: 10.1016/s1885-5857(09)60007-4.
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, Falk V, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, Jessup M, Linde C, Nihoyannopoulos P, Parissis JT, Pieske B, Riley JP, Rosano GM, Ruilope LM, Ruschitzka F, Rutten FH, van der Meer P; Authors/Task Force Members; Document Reviewers. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.592. Epub 2016 May 20. No abstract available.
Ambrosy AP, Fonarow GC, Butler J, Chioncel O, Greene SJ, Vaduganathan M, Nodari S, Lam CSP, Sato N, Shah AN, Gheorghiade M. The global health and economic burden of hospitalizations for heart failure: lessons learned from hospitalized heart failure registries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;63(12):1123-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.053. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
Anguita Sanchez M, Lambert Rodriguez JL, Bover Freire R, Comin Colet J, Crespo Leiro MG, Gonzalez Vilchez F, Manito Lorite N, Segovia Cubero J, Ruiz Mateas F, Elola Somoza FJ, Iniguez Romo A. Classification and Quality Standards of Heart Failure Units: Scientific Consensus of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016 Oct;69(10):940-950. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Aug 27. English, Spanish.
McDonagh TA, Blue L, Clark AL, Dahlstrom U, Ekman I, Lainscak M, McDonald K, Ryder M, Stromberg A, Jaarsma T; European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Association Committee on Patient Care. European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Association Standards for delivering heart failure care. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Mar;13(3):235-41. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq221. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
Burns DJP, Arora J, Okunade O, Beltrame JF, Bernardez-Pereira S, Crespo-Leiro MG, Filippatos GS, Hardman S, Hoes AW, Hutchison S, Jessup M, Kinsella T, Knapton M, Lam CSP, Masoudi FA, McIntyre H, Mindham R, Morgan L, Otterspoor L, Parker V, Persson HE, Pinnock C, Reid CM, Riley J, Stevenson LW, McDonagh TA. International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM): Standardized Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement Set for Heart Failure Patients. JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Mar;8(3):212-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
McNamara RL, Spatz ES, Kelley TA, Stowell CJ, Beltrame J, Heidenreich P, Tresserras R, Jernberg T, Chua T, Morgan L, Panigrahi B, Rosas Ruiz A, Rumsfeld JS, Sadwin L, Schoeberl M, Shahian D, Weston C, Yeh R, Lewin J. Standardized Outcome Measurement for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus From the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM). J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 May 19;4(5):e001767. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001767.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HF-Outcomes-Spain
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.